• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在激素受体阳性肿瘤患者中,小叶癌和导管癌之间的雌激素和孕激素受体表达水平没有差异。

Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression levels do not differ between lobular and ductal carcinoma in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors.

作者信息

Truin Wilfred, Roumen Rudi M H, Siesling Sabine, van de Vijver Koen K, Tjan-Heijnen Vivianne C G, Voogd Adri C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(1):133-138. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4220-x. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-017-4220-x
PMID:28365833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5487722/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differences in estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) expression between invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) could be an underlying reason for the difference in chemo-sensitivity and response to hormonal therapy between ILC and IDC. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in ER and PR expression levels between postmenopausal patients with hormonal receptor-positive ILC and IDC.

METHODS

We included all ER and/or PR receptor-positive ILC and IDC, diagnosed between January 2011 and December 2013 from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. A semi-quantitative classification was used to analyze differences in ER/PR expression, which consisted of three ER expression classes: 10-69, 70-89, and ≥90%. Differences in ER and PR expression levels between IDC and ILC were analyzed according to age group, tumor size, axillary nodal status, grade, and HER2 status.

RESULTS

In total, 26,339 ER and/or PR-positive breast cancers were included in the study, of which 17% were ILC and 83% IDC. In patients with IDC, 86% of the tumors showed an ER expression level of 90% or more, compared to 84% in those with ILC. In both IDC and ILC a PR expression level of 90% or more was observed in 54% of the tumors. In postmenopausal patients aged 50-69 years no significant differences could be observed in ER and PR expression levels between ILC and IDC.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ER and PR-positive ILC and IDC have similar quantitative ER and PR expression profiles, implicating that ER/PR expression is unlikely to be a confounding factor in studies concerning chemo-sensitivity of ILC and IDC.

摘要

背景

浸润性小叶癌(ILC)和浸润性导管癌(IDC)之间雌激素(ER)和孕激素(PR)表达的差异可能是ILC和IDC化疗敏感性及激素治疗反应存在差异的潜在原因。本研究的目的是调查绝经后激素受体阳性的ILC和IDC患者之间ER和PR表达水平的差异。

方法

我们纳入了2011年1月至2013年12月期间基于人群的荷兰癌症登记处诊断的所有ER和/或PR受体阳性的ILC和IDC。采用半定量分类法分析ER/PR表达的差异,该分类法包括三个ER表达类别:10 - 69%、70 - 89%和≥90%。根据年龄组、肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结状态、分级和HER2状态分析IDC和ILC之间ER和PR表达水平的差异。

结果

本研究共纳入26339例ER和/或PR阳性乳腺癌患者,其中17%为ILC,83%为IDC。在IDC患者中,86%的肿瘤ER表达水平为90%或更高,而ILC患者中这一比例为84%。在IDC和ILC中,均有54%的肿瘤PR表达水平为90%或更高。在50 - 69岁的绝经后患者中,未观察到ILC和IDC之间ER和PR表达水平的显著差异。

结论

ER和PR阳性的ILC和IDC患者具有相似的ER和PR定量表达谱,这意味着在关于ILC和IDC化疗敏感性的研究中,ER/PR表达不太可能是一个混杂因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/5487722/eeafd6b5a73d/10549_2017_4220_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/5487722/f3411574b761/10549_2017_4220_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/5487722/eeafd6b5a73d/10549_2017_4220_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/5487722/f3411574b761/10549_2017_4220_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b1/5487722/eeafd6b5a73d/10549_2017_4220_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression levels do not differ between lobular and ductal carcinoma in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors.在激素受体阳性肿瘤患者中,小叶癌和导管癌之间的雌激素和孕激素受体表达水平没有差异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(1):133-138. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4220-x. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
2
Comparison of the clinicopathological features of invasive ductal, invasive lobular, and mixed (invasive ductal + invasive lobular) carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性导管癌、浸润性小叶癌及混合性(浸润性导管 + 浸润性小叶)癌的临床病理特征比较。
Breast Cancer. 2015 Jul;22(4):374-81. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0489-8. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
3
Specific sites of metastases in invasive lobular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study of metastatic breast cancer.浸润性小叶癌转移的特定部位:转移性乳腺癌的一项回顾性队列研究
Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep;24(5):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0753-4. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Lobular breast cancers lack the inverse relationship between ER/PR status and cell growth rate characteristic of ductal cancers in two independent patient cohorts: implications for tumor biology and adjuvant therapy.在两个独立的患者队列中,小叶型乳腺癌缺乏雌激素受体/孕激素受体(ER/PR)状态与导管癌特征性细胞生长速率之间的负相关关系:对肿瘤生物学和辅助治疗的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Nov 10;14:826. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-826.
5
Survival analysis in patients with invasive lobular cancer and invasive ductal cancer according to hormone receptor expression status in the Korean population.根据韩国人群中激素受体表达状态分析浸润性小叶癌和浸润性导管癌患者的生存情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0262709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262709. eCollection 2022.
6
The prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma, lobular carcinoma and mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma according to molecular subtypes of the breast.根据乳腺癌的分子亚型,评估浸润性导管癌、小叶癌和混合性导管及小叶癌的预后。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Jan;28(1):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01146-4. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
Expression of DDR1 and DVL1 in invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinoma does not correlate with histological type, grade and hormone receptor status.DDR1和DVL1在浸润性导管癌和小叶癌中的表达与组织学类型、分级及激素受体状态无关。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2385-90. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.6.2385.
8
Relative effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性小叶癌与浸润性导管癌辅助化疗的相对疗效
Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;123(16):3015-3021. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30699. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Strong adverse effect of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression on prognosis of patients with invasive lobular breast cancer: a comparative study with invasive ductal breast cancer in Chinese population.表皮生长因子受体2过表达对浸润性小叶乳腺癌患者预后的强烈不良影响:一项在中国人群中与浸润性导管癌的对比研究。
Tumour Biol. 2015 Aug;36(8):6113-24. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3293-6. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
10
Targetable ERBB2 mutation status is an independent marker of adverse prognosis in estrogen receptor positive, ERBB2 non-amplified primary lobular breast carcinoma: a retrospective in silico analysis of public datasets.可靶向的 ERBB2 突变状态是雌激素受体阳性、ERBB2 非扩增原发性小叶乳腺癌不良预后的独立标志物:公共数据集的回顾性计算机分析。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01324-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Fetal Mammary Gland Development and Offspring's Breast Cancer Risk in Adulthood.胎儿乳腺发育与成年后代患乳腺癌的风险
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;14(2):106. doi: 10.3390/biology14020106.
2
Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a nationwide population-based cohort study.多囊卵巢综合征与绝经前和绝经后妇女乳腺癌风险:一项全国基于人群的队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Dec;208(3):535-542. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07467-8. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Response and Surgical Management with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.浸润性小叶癌与导管癌新辅助化疗的反应及手术管理差异
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):51-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4603-3. Epub 2015 May 16.
2
Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.定制疗法——改善早期乳腺癌的管理:2015年早期乳腺癌初始治疗圣加仑国际专家共识
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1533-46. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
Invasive lobular breast cancer and its variants: how special are they for systemic therapy decisions?
在机构系列中定量小叶性乳腺癌中的激素受体状态:雌激素和孕激素受体状态与结局的关系。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(2):367-375. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07059-y. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Role of Gut Microbiota in Breast Cancer and Drug Resistance.肠道微生物群在乳腺癌和耐药性中的作用。
Pathogens. 2023 Mar 16;12(3):468. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12030468.
5
Level of Combined Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Expression Determines the Eligibility for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients.雌激素和孕激素受体联合表达水平决定乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌治疗的适用性。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 6;13(19):5007. doi: 10.3390/cancers13195007.
6
Differential Regulation and Targeting of Estrogen Receptor α Turnover in Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma.雌激素受体α降解的差异调控及其在浸润性小叶乳腺癌中的靶向作用。
Endocrinology. 2020 Sep 1;161(9). doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa109.
7
[Atypical course of an apocrine sweat gland carcinoma of the axilla : A very rare malignant tumor and its interdisciplinary treatment].[腋窝顶泌汗腺癌的非典型病程:一种极为罕见的恶性肿瘤及其多学科治疗]
Hautarzt. 2017 Oct;68(10):831-834. doi: 10.1007/s00105-017-4002-8.
浸润性小叶乳腺癌及其变异型:它们对全身治疗决策有何特殊影响?
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014 Dec;92(3):235-57. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
4
Response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 1,051 patients with infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma.1051 例浸润性小叶乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗的反应和预后。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Feb;144(1):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2861-6. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
5
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ductal compared to lobular carcinoma of the breast: a meta-analysis of published trials including 1,764 lobular breast cancer.乳腺导管癌与乳腺小叶癌新辅助化疗反应的比较:包括 1764 例乳腺小叶癌在内的已发表试验的荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Nov;142(2):227-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2751-3. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
6
The molecular diversity of Luminal A breast tumors.Luminal A 型乳腺癌的分子多样性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Oct;141(3):409-20. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2699-3. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
7
Different outcome variables yield different results!不同的结果变量会产生不同的结果!
Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb;24(2):554. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds630. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
8
Influence of semi-quantitative oestrogen receptor expression on adjuvant endocrine therapy efficacy in ductal and lobular breast cancer - a TEAM study analysis.半定量雌激素受体表达对导管癌和小叶癌辅助内分泌治疗疗效的影响——TEAM 研究分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jan;49(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.026. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
9
Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with invasive ductal versus lobular breast cancer.绝经后浸润性导管癌与浸润性小叶癌患者辅助化疗的效果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Nov;23(11):2859-2865. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds180. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Lobular breast cancer: same survival and local control compared with ductal cancer, but should both be treated the same way? analysis of an institutional database over a 10-year period.乳腺小叶癌:与导管癌相比,生存率和局部控制率相同,但两者的治疗方式应该相同吗?对 10 年期间机构数据库的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1107-14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1907-9. Epub 2011 Sep 13.