Inoue Masayuki, Nakagomi Hiroshi, Nakada Haruka, Furuya Kazushige, Ikegame Kou, Watanabe Hideki, Omata Masao, Oyama Toshio
Department of Surgery, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Japan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep;24(5):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0753-4. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is known to be the second most common histological type following invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Definitive clinical features of ILC are controversial.
We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 330 patients with metastatic breast cancer, 303 of IDC, 19 of ILC, and 8 of others. We compared the patient age and tumor-node-metastasis factors, disease-free survival (DFS), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression at the primary site between ILC and IDC. We then selected the patients in the ER or PR/HER2 subtype specifically and compared sites of recurrence, and the survival curve starting from the point of development of metastatic disease.
The clinical stage was significantly higher in the ILC patients than in the IDC (p = 0.001). The mean (±SD) of DFS for the ILC and IDC patients was 2.6 ± 0.6 and 2.4 ± 0.3 years, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.18). However, the hormone receptor status was same between both groups; the rate of HER2 positivity was significantly lower in the ILC group (0%) than in the IDC group (16.2%) (p = 0.05). In ER or PR/HER2 subtype, the mean DFS for the ILC and IDC was 2.9 ± 0.6 and 3.1 ± 0.3 years, and the median survival time after the recurrence for ILC and IDC patients was 4.2 ± 0.7 and 5.6 ± 0.7 years, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.77). The frequency of lung metastases was significantly lower in the ILC group (6.3%) than in the IDC group (53.7%) (p < 0.01), while the frequency of peritoneal metastases was significantly higher in the ILC group (68.8%) than in the IDC group (1%) (p = 0.00). Of note, the prognosis after the diagnosis of peritoneal metastases was poor, with a median survival time of 19 ± 9 months and resistance to hormone therapy.
The extremely high rate (68.8%) of peritoneal metastases was observed in long-term follow-up for the metastatic breast cancer patients with ILC. We need to reveal the definitive feature of ILC and develop new therapeutic strategies to prevent the dissemination of ILCs.
浸润性小叶癌(ILC)是继浸润性导管癌(IDC)之后第二常见的组织学类型。ILC确切的临床特征存在争议。
我们回顾性分析了一组330例转移性乳腺癌患者,其中303例为IDC,19例为ILC,8例为其他类型。我们比较了ILC和IDC患者的年龄、肿瘤-淋巴结-转移因素、无病生存期(DFS)、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)以及原发部位的人表皮生长因子2(HER2)表达情况。然后我们专门挑选了ER或PR/HER2亚型的患者,比较了复发部位以及从转移性疾病发生点开始的生存曲线。
ILC患者的临床分期显著高于IDC患者(p = 0.001)。ILC和IDC患者的DFS均值(±标准差)分别为2.6±0.6年和2.4±0.3年,无显著差异(p = 0.18)。然而,两组之间的激素受体状态相同;ILC组HER2阳性率(0%)显著低于IDC组(16.2%)(p = 0.05)。在ER或PR/HER2亚型中,ILC和IDC的DFS均值分别为2.9±0.6年和3.1±0.3年,ILC和IDC患者复发后的中位生存时间分别为4.2±0.7年和5.6±0.7年,无显著差异(p = 0.77)。ILC组肺转移的频率(6.3%)显著低于IDC组(53.7%)(p < 0.01),而ILC组腹膜转移的频率(68.8%)显著高于IDC组(1%)(p = 0.00)。值得注意的是,诊断为腹膜转移后的预后较差,中位生存时间为19±9个月,且对激素治疗耐药。
在对ILC转移性乳腺癌患者的长期随访中观察到极高的腹膜转移率(68.8%)。我们需要揭示ILC的确切特征并制定新的治疗策略以防止ILC扩散。