Konnai Ramya, Scherer Ronald C, Peplinski Amy, Ryan Kenneth
Department of Neurology, Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital, West Bloomfield, Michigan.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio.
J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):773.e11-773.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Whisper is known to be produced by different speakers differently, especially with respect to glottal configuration that influences glottal aerodynamics. Differences in whisper production and phonation types imply important linguistic information in many languages, are identified in vocal pathologies, are used to communicate mood and emotion, and are used in vocal performance.
The present study focused on investigating the aerodynamic differences between whisper and phonation at different loudness and adduction levels.
Three men and five women between 20 and 40 years of age participated in the study. Smooth syllable strings of the syllable /baep:/ were whispered and phonated at three different loudness levels (soft, medium, and loud) and three voice qualities (breathy, normal, and pressed). The voice qualities are associated with different adduction levels. This resulted in 18 treatment combinations (three adduction levels × three loudness levels × two sexes).
A regression analysis was performed using a PROC MIXED procedure with SAS statistical software. Under similar production conditions, subglottal pressure was significantly lower in whisper than in phonation in 10 of 18 combinations, mean glottal airflow was significantly higher in whisper than in phonation in 13 of 18 combinations, and flow resistance was significantly lower in whisper than in phonation in 14 of 18 combinations, with the female subjects demonstrating these trends more frequently than the male subjects do. Of importance, in general, compared with phonation under similar production conditions, whisper is not always accompanied by lower subglottal pressure and higher airflows.
Results from this study suggest that the typical finding of lower subglottal pressure, higher glottal airflow, and decreased flow resistance in whisper compared with phonation cannot be generalized to all individuals and depends on the "whisper type." The nine basic production conditions (three loudness levels and three adduction levels) resulted in data that may help explain the wide range of variation of whisper production reported in earlier studies.
众所周知,不同的说话者发出的低语存在差异,尤其是在影响声门空气动力学的声门配置方面。低语发声和发声类型的差异在许多语言中蕴含着重要的语言信息,在嗓音病理学中可以识别出来,用于传达情绪和情感,也用于声乐表演。
本研究重点调查低语和发声在不同响度和内收水平下的空气动力学差异。
三名20至40岁的男性和五名20至40岁的女性参与了该研究。音节/baep:/的平滑音节串以三种不同的响度水平(轻柔、适中、响亮)和三种嗓音质量(呼吸声、正常、紧压声)进行低语和发声。这些嗓音质量与不同的内收水平相关。这产生了18种处理组合(三种内收水平×三种响度水平×两种性别)。
使用SAS统计软件的PROC MIXED过程进行回归分析。在相似的发声条件下,18种组合中有10种组合中,低语时的声门下压力明显低于发声时;18种组合中有13种组合中,低语时的平均声门气流明显高于发声时;18种组合中有14种组合中,低语时的气流阻力明显低于发声时,女性受试者比男性受试者更频繁地表现出这些趋势。重要的是,一般来说,与相似发声条件下的发声相比,低语并不总是伴随着较低的声门下压力和较高的气流。
本研究结果表明,与发声相比,低语时声门下压力较低、声门气流较高和气流阻力降低这一典型发现不能推广到所有个体,并且取决于“低语类型”。这九种基本发声条件(三种响度水平和三种内收水平)产生的数据可能有助于解释早期研究中报道的低语发声的广泛变化。