Herbst Christian T, Hess Markus, Müller Frank, Švec Jan G, Sundberg Johan
Voice Research Lab, Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Laboratory of Bio-Acoustics, Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Department of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
J Voice. 2015 Jul;29(4):391-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.009. Epub 2015 May 2.
Previous research suggests that independent variation of vocal loudness and glottal configuration (type and degree of vocal fold adduction) does not occur in untrained speech production. This study investigated whether these factors can be varied independently in trained singing and how subglottal pressure is related to average glottal airflow, voice source properties, and sound level under these conditions. A classically trained baritone produced sustained phonations on the endoscopic vowel [i:] at pitch D4 (approximately 294 Hz), exclusively varying either (a) vocal register; (b) phonation type (from "breathy" to "pressed" via cartilaginous adduction); or (c) vocal loudness, while keeping the others constant. Phonation was documented by simultaneous recording of videokymographic, electroglottographic, airflow and voice source data, and by percutaneous measurement of relative subglottal pressure. Register shifts were clearly marked in the electroglottographic wavegram display. Compared with chest register, falsetto was produced with greater pulse amplitude of the glottal flow, H1-H2, mean airflow, and with lower maximum flow declination rate (MFDR), subglottal pressure, and sound pressure. Shifts of phonation type (breathy/flow/neutral/pressed) induced comparable systematic changes. Increase of vocal loudness resulted in increased subglottal pressure, average flow, sound pressure, MFDR, glottal flow pulse amplitude, and H1-H2. When changing either vocal register or phonation type, subglottal pressure and mean airflow showed an inverse relationship, that is, variation of glottal flow resistance. The direct relation between subglottal pressure and airflow when varying only vocal loudness demonstrated independent control of vocal loudness and glottal configuration. Achieving such independent control of phonatory control parameters would be an important target in vocal pedagogy and in voice therapy.
先前的研究表明,在未经训练的言语发声中,声强和声门配置(声带内收的类型和程度)不会独立变化。本研究调查了在经过训练的歌唱中这些因素是否可以独立变化,以及在这些条件下声门下压力与平均声门气流、声源特性和声音水平之间的关系。一位接受过古典声乐训练的男中音在喉镜下发元音[i:],音高为D4(约294赫兹),持续发声,仅分别改变(a)声区;(b)发声类型(从“气息声”通过软骨内收变为“挤压声”);或(c)声强,同时保持其他因素不变。通过同步记录视频记波图、电声门图、气流和声源数据,以及经皮测量相对声门下压力来记录发声情况。声区转换在电声门图波形显示中清晰可见。与胸声区相比,假声区产生的声门气流脉冲幅度、H1-H2、平均气流更大,而最大气流下降率(MFDR)、声门下压力和声压更低。发声类型的转换(气息声/气流声/中性声/挤压声)引起了类似的系统性变化。声强增加导致声门下压力、平均气流、声压、MFDR、声门气流脉冲幅度和H1-H2增加。当改变声区或发声类型时,声门下压力和平均气流呈反比关系,即声门气流阻力的变化。仅改变声强时声门下压力与气流之间的直接关系表明,声强和声门配置可以独立控制。实现对发声控制参数的这种独立控制将是声乐教学和嗓音治疗的一个重要目标。