Suppr超能文献

单独使用Bio-Oss或Bio-Oss与颗粒状自体骨移植混合进行侧嵴增高术:一项系统评价。

Lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic review.

作者信息

Aludden H C, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Jensen T

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;46(8):1030-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcomes when using Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone grafts for lateral ridge augmentation. A search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English from 1 January 1990 to 1 May 2016 were included. The search provided 337 titles and six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Considerable variation prevented a meta-analysis from being performed. The two treatment modalities have never been compared within the same study. Non-comparative studies demonstrated a 3-year implant survival of 96% with 50% Bio-Oss mixed with 50% autogenous bone graft. Moreover, Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone graft seems to increase the amount of newly formed bone as well as the width of the alveolar process. Within the limitations of this systematic review, lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or in combination with autogenous bone graft seems to induce newly formed bone and increase the width of the alveolar process, with high short-term implant survival. However, long-term studies comparing the two treatment modalities are needed before final conclusions can be drawn.

摘要

本系统评价的目的是验证以下假设

在进行外侧牙槽嵴增高术时,单独使用Bio-Oss或Bio-Oss与颗粒状自体骨移植混合使用,种植治疗结果无差异。我们对MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库进行了检索,并手动检索了相关期刊。纳入了1990年1月1日至2016年5月1日期间发表的英文人体研究。检索得到337篇标题,其中六项研究符合纳入标准。由于存在较大差异,无法进行荟萃分析。这两种治疗方式从未在同一研究中进行过比较。非对照研究表明,使用50%Bio-Oss与50%自体骨移植混合时,种植体3年生存率为96%。此外,单独使用Bio-Oss或Bio-Oss与自体骨移植混合使用似乎会增加新形成骨的量以及牙槽突的宽度。在本系统评价的局限性内,单独使用Bio-Oss或与自体骨移植联合进行外侧牙槽嵴增高术似乎会诱导新形成骨并增加牙槽突宽度,种植体短期生存率较高。然而,在得出最终结论之前,需要进行比较这两种治疗方式的长期研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验