• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小切口作为儿童藏毛窦切除术的一种有前景的技术。

Minimal incision as a promising technique for resection of pilonidal sinus in children.

作者信息

Speter Chen, Zmora Osnat, Nadler Roy, Shinhar Daniel, Bilik Ron

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, 5265601, Israel.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, 5265601, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Sep;52(9):1484-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.040
PMID:28366559
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate functional and long-term outcome of a minimal incision technique for resection of pilonidal sinus in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All children who underwent surgery for pilonidal sinus in our institution between October 2008 and March 2015 were included. We performed a retrospective chart review and a follow-up telephone survey. Demographic, clinical and outcome data were compared between patients who underwent either minimal incision or wide excision surgery.

RESULTS

Study groups included 21 cases of minimal incision procedure and 21 cases of wide excision procedure with similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Postoperative functional outcome was significantly better in the minimal incision group with fewer days on analgesics (0 versus 2.5, P=0.005), fewer sick days (4 versus 14, P<0.001), and fewer days to full activity (10 versus 45, P<0.001). Reoperation rate was 28% for minimal incision and 9% for wide excision (P=0.238). Overall long-term favorable outcome (no reoperation/recurrent abscess/continued symptoms) rate was 62% after minimal incision and 45% after wide excision (P=0.354).

CONCLUSION

The minimal incision is a promising technique for resection of pilonidal sinus in children as it is associated with better postoperative functional outcome and comparable long-term outcome compared with wide excision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study- level III.

摘要

目的

评估儿童藏毛窦切除的微创技术的功能及长期疗效。

患者与方法

纳入2008年10月至2015年3月间在本机构接受藏毛窦手术的所有儿童。我们进行了回顾性病历审查及随访电话调查。对接受微创或广泛切除手术的患者的人口统计学、临床及疗效数据进行比较。

结果

研究组包括21例微创病例和21例广泛切除病例,两组在人口统计学及临床特征方面相似。微创组术后功能结局显著更好,镇痛天数更少(0天对2.5天,P = 0.005),病假天数更少(4天对14天,P < 0.001),完全恢复活动的天数更少(10天对45天,P < 0.001)。微创组再次手术率为28%,广泛切除组为9%(P = 0.238)。微创术后总体长期良好结局(无再次手术/复发性脓肿/持续症状)率为62%,广泛切除术后为45%(P = 0.354)。

结论

微创是一种有前景的儿童藏毛窦切除技术,因为与广泛切除相比,它术后功能结局更好,长期疗效相当。

证据水平

治疗性研究 - III级。

相似文献

1
Minimal incision as a promising technique for resection of pilonidal sinus in children.小切口作为儿童藏毛窦切除术的一种有前景的技术。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Sep;52(9):1484-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
[Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate].藏毛窦切除术后一期中线缝合与高复发率相关。
Chirurg. 2003 May;74(5):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0616-8.
3
Minimal Pilonidal Surgery vs. Common Wide Excision Operations: Better Well-Being and Comparable Recurrence Rates.微创型与传统广泛型切除术治疗藏毛窦的对比:更好的健康状况和相似的复发率。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Feb;24(2):89-95.
4
[The comparison of incision and drainage with skin excision and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess].[切开引流术与皮肤切除术及刮除术治疗急性藏毛窦脓肿的比较]
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003 Apr;9(2):120-3.
5
Trephine Minimally Invasive Procedure for Pilonidal Sinus.微创环锯术治疗藏毛窦
Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Feb;24(2):96-100.
6
Outcomes of Unroofing with Limited Excision and Structured Postoperative Care for Pilonidal Disease.藏毛窦疾病行有限切除联合结构化术后护理的开窗治疗效果
Am Surg. 2017 Oct 1;83(10):1045-1049.
7
Pediatric Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: An Effective Procedure for Children with Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease After Failed Open Surgery.小儿内镜下藏毛窦治疗:开放性手术失败后复发性藏毛窦疾病患儿的有效治疗方法。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jul;29(7):981-986. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0031. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.微创视频辅助切除藏毛窦的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):547-53. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5233.
9
Trephination versus wide excision for the treatment of pediatric pilonidal disease.颅骨钻孔术与广泛切除术治疗小儿藏毛窦病。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Apr;55(4):747-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
10
Pediatric Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment, a Revolutionary Technique to Adopt in Children with Pilonidal Sinus Fistulas: Our Preliminary Experience.小儿内镜下藏毛窦治疗:一种适用于藏毛窦瘘患儿的革命性技术——我们的初步经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):359-363. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0246. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric pilonidal sinus disease: Recurrence rates of different age groups compared to adults.小儿藏毛窦疾病:不同年龄组与成人相比的复发率
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Jan 7;23:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.01.001. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Trephination for primary pediatric pilonidal sinus disease: medium term functional and recurrence outcome of a large cohort.小儿原发性藏毛窦疾病的环钻术:一大群患者的中期功能及复发结果
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Dec 21;41(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05941-4.
3
Outcomes of pediatric pilonidal disease treatment: excision with off-midline flap reconstruction versus endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment.
小儿藏毛窦病治疗的结果:切除加中线以外皮瓣重建与内镜下藏毛窦治疗的比较。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Jan 31;40(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05629-1.
4
Paediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Early Recurrences Irrespective of the Treatment Approaches in a Retrospective Multi-centric Analysis.小儿骶尾部藏毛窦疾病:回顾性多中心分析显示,无论采用何种治疗方法,早期复发率均较高。
World J Surg. 2023 Sep;47(9):2296-2303. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07045-x. Epub 2023 May 18.
5
Primary Transverse Closure Compared to Open Wound Treatment for Primary Pilonidal Sinus Disease in Children.儿童原发性藏毛窦疾病的一期横向缝合与开放伤口治疗对比
Children (Basel). 2020 Oct 17;7(10):187. doi: 10.3390/children7100187.
6
Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Excision: Preliminary Report.微创根治术:初步报告。
World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1086-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05313-3.
7
Inverse 'D' incision technique in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; excision with minimal tissue loss, closure without tension and lateral location of the suture line.倒“D”形切口技术治疗藏毛窦疾病;切除时组织损失最小,无张力缝合,缝线位于外侧。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Nov;97(5):261-265. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.5.261. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.地理因素和手术方式对全球藏毛窦疾病复发的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 22;9(1):15111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51159-z.
9
Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.常见的手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:荟萃分析、合并数据分析和复发的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.