• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创型与传统广泛型切除术治疗藏毛窦的对比:更好的健康状况和相似的复发率。

Minimal Pilonidal Surgery vs. Common Wide Excision Operations: Better Well-Being and Comparable Recurrence Rates.

机构信息

Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Feb;24(2):89-95.

PMID:35187897
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pilonidal disease in the natal cleft is treated traditionally by a wide and deep excision of the affected area. There is growing awareness, however, to the advantages of minimally invasive surgeries.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of wide excision operations and minimal trephine surgery in patients with primary pilonidal disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we examined surgical and inpatient records of 2039 patients who underwent surgery for primary pilonidal disease in five private hospitals between 2009 and 2012. Most procedures were of lay-open, primary midline closure, and minimal surgery types. Pilonidal recurrence rates were evaluated in a subset of 1260 patients operated by 53 surgeons each performing one type of surgery, regardless of patient characteristics or disease severity.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 7.2 years, 81.5%, 85%, and 88% of patients were disease-free after minimally invasive surgery, wide excision with primary closure, and lay-open surgery, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates. Minimal surgeries were usually performed under local anesthesia and involved lower pain levels, less need for analgesics, and shorter hospital stays than wide excision operations, which were normally performed under general anesthesia. The use of drainage, antibiotics, or methylene blue had no effect on recurrence of pilonidal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgeries have the advantage of reducing the extent of surgical injury and preserving patient's quality of life. They should be the treatment of choice for primary pilonidal disease.

摘要

背景

传统上,会通过广泛而深入地切除受影响区域来治疗会阴部藏毛窦病。然而,人们越来越意识到微创手术的优势。

目的

比较广泛切除手术和微创环钻术治疗原发性藏毛窦病的疗效。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们检查了 2039 名在 2009 年至 2012 年间在五家私人医院接受原发性藏毛窦病手术的患者的手术和住院记录。大多数手术采用切开、一期中线缝合和微创手术类型。在一个由 53 名外科医生组成的亚组中,评估了 1260 名患者的藏毛窦复发率,每位外科医生只进行一种手术,无论患者特征或疾病严重程度如何。

结果

平均随访 7.2 年后,微创组、广泛切除一期缝合组和切开引流组分别有 81.5%、85%和 88%的患者无疾病复发,复发率无统计学差异。微创手术通常在局部麻醉下进行,疼痛程度较低,对镇痛药的需求较少,住院时间较短,而广泛切除手术通常在全身麻醉下进行。引流、抗生素或亚甲蓝的使用对藏毛窦病的复发没有影响。

结论

微创手术具有减少手术损伤程度和保留患者生活质量的优势。它们应该是原发性藏毛窦病的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Minimal Pilonidal Surgery vs. Common Wide Excision Operations: Better Well-Being and Comparable Recurrence Rates.微创型与传统广泛型切除术治疗藏毛窦的对比:更好的健康状况和相似的复发率。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Feb;24(2):89-95.
2
Trephine Minimally Invasive Procedure for Pilonidal Sinus.微创环锯术治疗藏毛窦
Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Feb;24(2):96-100.
3
Sinusectomy for primary pilonidal sinus: less is more.经鼻内镜鼻窦手术治疗原发性藏毛窦:少即是多。
Surgery. 2011 Nov;150(5):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.019. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
4
Impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative pain and long term recurrence after surgery for pilonidal disease.脊柱麻醉与全身麻醉对藏毛窦疾病手术后疼痛及长期复发的影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.061. Epub 2016 May 5.
5
Comparison between three therapeutic modalities for non-complicated pilonidal sinus disease.非复杂性藏毛窦疾病三种治疗方式的比较
Surgeon. 2005 Apr;3(2):73-7. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(05)80065-4.
6
How to repair the surgical defect after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a dilemma.如何修复骶尾部藏毛窦切除术后的手术缺损:一个两难问题。
J Wound Care. 2014 Dec;23(12):630-3. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.630.
7
Treatment of pilonidal disease by minimal surgical excision under local anesthesia with healing by secondary intention: Results in over 500 patients.局部麻醉下最小手术切除治疗藏毛窦病:超过 500 例患者的结果。
Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1217-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.046. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Excision: Preliminary Report.微创根治术:初步报告。
World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1086-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05313-3.
9
Trephination versus wide excision for the treatment of pediatric pilonidal disease.颅骨钻孔术与广泛切除术治疗小儿藏毛窦病。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Apr;55(4):747-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
10
Pediatric Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment, a Revolutionary Technique to Adopt in Children with Pilonidal Sinus Fistulas: Our Preliminary Experience.小儿内镜下藏毛窦治疗:一种适用于藏毛窦瘘患儿的革命性技术——我们的初步经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):359-363. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0246. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice patterns of paediatric surgeons on treating pilonidal sinus disease - a national survey study.小儿外科医生治疗藏毛窦疾病的实践模式——一项全国性调查研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul 28;40(1):165. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04959-x.
2
Outcomes of pediatric pilonidal disease treatment: excision with off-midline flap reconstruction versus endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment.小儿藏毛窦病治疗的结果:切除加中线以外皮瓣重建与内镜下藏毛窦治疗的比较。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Jan 31;40(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05629-1.