Wang Ching-Jen, Cheng Jai-Hong, Chou Wen-Yi, Hsu Shan-Ling, Chen Jen-Hung, Huang Chien-Yiu
Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering;; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Section of Sports Medicine.
Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering.
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Feb 23;14(3):213-223. doi: 10.7150/ijms.17469. eCollection 2017.
We assessed the pathological changes of articular cartilage and subchondral bone on different locations of the knee after extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in early osteoarthritis (OA). Rat knees under OA model by anterior cruciate ligament transaction (ACLT) and medial meniscectomy (MM) to induce OA changes. Among ESWT groups, ESWT were applied to medial (M) femur (F) and tibia (T) condyles was better than medial tibia condyle, medial femur condyle as well as medial and lateral (L) tibia condyles in gross osteoarthritic areas (p<0.05), osteophyte formation and subchondral sclerotic bone (p<0.05). Using sectional cartilage area, modified Mankin scoring system as well as thickness of calcified and un-calcified cartilage analysis, the results showed that articular cartilage damage was ameliorated and T+F(M) group had the most protection as compared with other locations (p<0.05). Detectable cartilage surface damage and proteoglycan loss were measured and T+F(M) group showed the smallest lesion score among other groups (p<0.05). Micro-CT revealed significantly improved in subchondral bone repair in all ESWT groups compared to OA group (p<0.05). There were no significantly differences in bone remodeling after ESWT groups except F(M) group. In the immunohistochemical analysis, T+F(M) group significant reduced TUNEL activity, promoted cartilage proliferation by observation of PCNA marker and reduced vascular invasion through observation of CD31 marker for angiogenesis compared to OA group (P<0.001). Overall the data suggested that the order of the effective site of ESWT was T+F(M) ≧ T(M) > T(M+L) > F(M) in OA rat knees.
我们评估了早期骨关节炎(OA)体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)后膝关节不同部位关节软骨和软骨下骨的病理变化。通过前交叉韧带切断术(ACLT)和内侧半月板切除术(MM)建立OA大鼠模型以诱导OA改变。在ESWT组中,在大体骨关节炎区域,将ESWT应用于股骨内侧(M)、股骨(F)和胫骨(T)髁比应用于胫骨内侧髁、股骨内侧髁以及胫骨内侧和外侧(L)髁更好(p<0.05),在骨赘形成和软骨下硬化骨方面也是如此(p<0.05)。通过测量软骨截面积、改良的Mankin评分系统以及钙化和未钙化软骨的厚度分析,结果显示关节软骨损伤得到改善,与其他部位相比,T+F(M)组具有最大的保护作用(p<0.05)。测量了可检测到的软骨表面损伤和蛋白聚糖损失,T+F(M)组在其他组中显示出最小的损伤评分(p<0.05)。微CT显示,与OA组相比,所有ESWT组的软骨下骨修复均有显著改善(p<0.05)。除F(M)组外,ESWT组之间的骨重塑无显著差异。在免疫组织化学分析中,与OA组相比,T+F(M)组通过观察PCNA标记物显著降低TUNEL活性、促进软骨增殖,并通过观察CD31标记物减少血管生成的血管侵入(P<0.001)。总体而言,数据表明在OA大鼠膝关节中,ESWT有效部位的顺序为T+F(M)≧T(M)>T(M+L)>F(M)。