Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗联合全视网膜光凝与单纯全视网膜光凝治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效比较

Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab combined with pan retinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone in treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

作者信息

Sameen Murtaza, Khan Muhammad Saim, Mukhtar Ahsan, Yaqub Muhammad Amer, Ishaq Mazhar

机构信息

Dr. Murtaza Sameen, MBBS. Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Dr. Muhammad Saim Khan, MBBS, FCPS, FICO, MRCSEd. Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jan-Feb;33(1):142-145. doi: 10.12669/pjms.331.11497.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare effectiveness of pan-retinal photocoagulation alone versus panretinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal bevacizumab on visual acuity and central macular thickness in patients presenting with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

This Randomized controlled trial was carried out at Armed Forces Institute of ophthalmology, Pakistan from Jan 2016 to Aug 2016. Seventy six eyes of 50 patients having proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema were included in the study. All the patients were subjected to detailed clinical examination that included Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp examination of anterior and posterior segments. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were carried out and patients were divided in two groups (GP and GI). Three monthly sessions of Pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) using Pattern Scan Laser (PASCAL) alone was performed in group GP while PRP along with three monthly intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) was performed in group GI. BCVA and CMT was recorded 04 weeks after the third PRP session in both the groups.

RESULTS

Seventy six eyes of 50 patients (38 in each group) were treated with three sessions of PRP alone and PRP with IVB in Group GP and GI respectively. Mean age of the patient in group GP was 57.47± 6.08 years while that in group GI was 55.69 ±6.58. The magnitude of induced change in BCVA was 0.09 ± 0.15 in GP while 0.22 + 0.04 in GI groups while mean induced change in CMT after treatment was 77.44 ± 92.30 um and 117.50 ± 93.82 um in group GP and GI.

CONCLUSION

Laser PRP combined with IVB has superior visual and anatomical outcome than PRP alone in patients with combined presentation of PDR and DME.

摘要

目的

比较单纯全视网膜光凝与全视网膜光凝联合玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗对增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者视力和黄斑中心厚度的疗效。

方法

本随机对照试验于2016年1月至2016年8月在巴基斯坦武装部队眼科研究所进行。研究纳入了50例患有增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿的患者的76只眼。所有患者均接受了详细的临床检查,包括未矫正视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼前节和后节的裂隙灯检查。进行了光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和眼底荧光血管造影(FFA),并将患者分为两组(GP组和GI组)。GP组单独使用模式扫描激光(PASCAL)进行三个月一次的全视网膜光凝(PRP),而GI组进行PRP并联合三个月一次的玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(IVB)。两组在第三次PRP治疗后4周记录BCVA和CMT。

结果

50例患者的76只眼(每组38只)分别接受了单独三次PRP治疗以及GP组单独PRP和GI组PRP联合IVB治疗。GP组患者的平均年龄为57.47±6.08岁,而GI组为55.69±6.58岁。GP组BCVA的诱导变化幅度为0.09±0.15,而GI组为0.22+0.04,治疗后GP组和GI组CMT的平均诱导变化分别为77.44±92.30μm和117.50±93.82μm。

结论

对于合并增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿的患者,激光PRP联合IVB在视力和解剖学结果方面优于单纯PRP。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
New Therapeutic Approaches in Diabetic Retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变的新治疗方法
Rev Diabet Stud. 2015 Spring-Summer;12(1-2):196-210. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2015.12.196. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
6
Laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的激光光凝治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24;2014(11):CD011234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011234.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验