Arora Aditi, Schurz Matthias, Perner Josef
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6875850. doi: 10.1155/2017/6875850. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
In visual perspective taking (vPT) one has to concern oneself with what other people see and how they see it. Since seeing is a mental state, developmental studies have discussed vPT within the domain of "theory of mind (ToM)" but imaging studies have not treated it as such. Based on earlier results from several meta-analyses, we tested for the overlap of visual perspective taking studies with 6 different kinds of ToM studies: false belief, trait judgments, strategic games, social animations, mind in the eyes, and rational actions. Joint activation was observed between the vPT task and some kinds of ToM tasks in regions involving the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ), anterior precuneus, left middle occipital gyrus/extrastriate body area (EBA), and the left inferior frontal and precentral gyrus. Importantly, no overlap activation was found for the vPT tasks with the joint core of all six kinds of ToM tasks. This raises the important question of what the common denominator of all tasks that fall under the label of "theory of mind" is supposed to be if visual perspective taking is not one of them.
在视觉视角采择(vPT)中,个体必须关注他人看到了什么以及他们是如何看待的。由于视觉是一种心理状态,发展研究在“心理理论(ToM)”领域内讨论了vPT,但成像研究并未如此看待它。基于此前多项元分析的结果,我们测试了视觉视角采择研究与6种不同类型的ToM研究之间的重叠情况:错误信念、特质判断、策略游戏、社会动画、眼神心智化以及理性行动。在涉及左颞顶联合区(TPJ)、前楔叶、左枕中回/纹外体区(EBA)以及左额下回和中央前回的区域中,观察到vPT任务与某些类型的ToM任务之间存在共同激活。重要的是,在vPT任务与所有六种ToM任务的联合核心区域未发现重叠激活。这就引出了一个重要问题:如果视觉视角采择不是其中之一,那么被归类为“心理理论”的所有任务的共同特征应该是什么。