Suppr超能文献

使用四个或更少的被动监测器在低收入高层公寓中检测臭虫(半翅目:臭虫科)

Bed Bug (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) Detection in Low-Income, High-Rise Apartments Using Four or Fewer Passive Monitors.

作者信息

Vail K M, Chandler J G

机构信息

Entomology and Plant Pathology, 370 Plant Biotechnology Building, 2505 E J Chapman Drive, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4560 (

Corresponding author, e-mail:

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2017 Jun 1;110(3):1187-1194. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox053.

Abstract

Bed bug, Cimex lectularius L., management in low-income, high-rise housing for the elderly and disabled can be difficult. Early detection is key to slowing their spread, and reducing management cost and time needed for control. To determine the minimum number of passive monitors needed to detect low-level bed bug infestations in this environment, we evaluated three monitors placed one, two, or four per apartment in a 3 by 3 experimental design. One sticky monitor, The Bedbug Detection System, and the two pitfall monitors, ClimbUp Insect Interceptors BG and BlackOut BedBug Detectors, were evaluated. Bed bugs were trapped by the ClimbUp Insect Interceptors BG and the BlackOut BedBug Detector in 88% and 79% of apartments, respectively, but only in 39% of the apartments monitored with The Bedbug Detection System. The Bedbug Detection System required significantly longer time to detect bed bugs than either the ClimbUp Insect Interceptor BG or the BlackOut BedBug Detector. With the less effective Bedbug Detection System data removed from analyses, detection rates ranged from 80 to 90%, with no significant differences among one, two, or four monitors per apartment. Results indicate it is especially important to include a bed placement when only placing a few monitors. Future work should compare the combination of cursory visual inspections with various monitor numbers and placements per apartment to determine the most efficient, cost-effective system that will be accepted and implemented in low-income housing.

摘要

臭虫(温带臭虫)在为老年人和残疾人提供的低收入高层住房中的防治工作可能颇具难度。早期检测是减缓其传播速度、降低管理成本以及控制所需时间的关键。为确定在此环境中检测低水平臭虫侵扰所需的最少被动监测器数量,我们采用3×3实验设计,评估了在每个公寓放置1个、2个或4个的三种监测器。我们评估了一种粘性监测器(臭虫检测系统)以及两种陷阱式监测器(ClimbUp Insect Interceptors BG和BlackOut BedBug Detectors)。ClimbUp Insect Interceptors BG和BlackOut BedBug Detector分别在88%和79%的公寓中捕获到了臭虫,但使用臭虫检测系统监测的公寓中只有39%捕获到了臭虫。臭虫检测系统检测到臭虫所需的时间明显长于ClimbUp Insect Interceptor BG或BlackOut BedBug Detector。在分析中剔除效果较差的臭虫检测系统的数据后,检测率在80%至90%之间,每个公寓放置1个、2个或4个监测器之间没有显著差异。结果表明,仅放置少量监测器时,纳入床位监测尤为重要。未来的工作应比较粗略目视检查与每个公寓不同监测器数量和放置方式的组合,以确定在低收入住房中能够被接受并实施的最有效、最具成本效益的系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验