Suppr超能文献

识别心血管事件复发风险极高的血管患者:当前 ACC/AHA 极高危标准的验证。

Identification of vascular patients at very high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events: validation of the current ACC/AHA very high risk criteria.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 14;38(43):3211-3218. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx102.

Abstract

AIMS

To validate and assess performance of the current ACC/AHA very high risk criteria in patients with clinically manifest arterial disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were used from the SMART study (n = 7216) and REACH Registry (n = 48 322), two prospective cohorts of patients with manifest atherosclerotic arterial disease. Prevalence and incidence rates of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were calculated, according to the ACC/AHA VHR criteria (cardiovascular disease combined with diabetes, smoking, dyslipidaemia, and/or recent recurrent coronary events). Performance of the ACC/AHA criteria was compared with single very high risk factors in terms of C-statistics and Net Reclassification Index. All patients were at VHR according to the ESC guidelines (incidence of recurrent MACE in SMART was 2.4/100PY, with 95% CI 2.3-2.5/100PY and in REACH 5.1/100PY with 95% CI 5.0-5.3/100PY). In SMART 57% of the patients were at VHR according to the ACC/AHA criteria (incidence of recurrent MACE 2.7/100PY, 95% CI 2.5-2.9/100PY) and in REACH this was 64% (5.9/100PY, 95% CI 5.7-6.1/100PY). The C-statistic for the ACC/AHA VHR criteria was 0.53 in REACH and 0.54 in SMART. Very high risk factors with comparable or slightly better performance were eGFR < 45, polyvascular disease and age >70 years. Around two third of the patients meeting the ACC/AHA VHR criteria had a predicted 10-year risk of recurrent MACE <30%.

CONCLUSION

The ACC/AHA VHR criteria have limited discriminative power. Identifying patients with clinically manifest arterial disease at VHR for recurrent vascular events using eGFR <45, polyvascular disease, or age >70 years performs as well as the ACC/AHA VHR criteria.

摘要

目的

验证并评估当前 ACC/AHA 极高危标准在有临床明显动脉疾病的患者中的表现。

方法和结果

本研究使用了 SMART 研究(n=7216)和 REACH 注册研究(n=48322)的数据,这两个前瞻性队列研究的患者均有明显的动脉粥样硬化性动脉疾病。根据 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准(心血管疾病合并糖尿病、吸烟、血脂异常和/或近期复发性冠状动脉事件),计算复发主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的患病率和发生率。根据 C 统计量和净重新分类指数,比较了 ACC/AHA 标准与单一高危因素的表现。根据 ESC 指南,所有患者均处于 VHR(SMART 中复发 MACE 的发生率为 2.4/100 人年,95%CI 为 2.3-2.5/100 人年,REACH 为 5.1/100 人年,95%CI 为 5.0-5.3/100 人年)。在 SMART 中,根据 ACC/AHA 标准,57%的患者处于 VHR(复发 MACE 的发生率为 2.7/100 人年,95%CI 为 2.5-2.9/100 人年),在 REACH 中,这一比例为 64%(5.9/100 人年,95%CI 为 5.7-6.1/100 人年)。REACH 中 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准的 C 统计量为 0.53,SMART 为 0.54。具有相当或略优性能的高危因素包括 eGFR<45、多血管疾病和年龄>70 岁。符合 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准的患者中,约有三分之二的患者预计 10 年内复发 MACE 的风险<30%。

结论

ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准的区分能力有限。使用 eGFR<45、多血管疾病或年龄>70 岁来识别有临床明显动脉疾病的患者,其处于 VHR 状态以发生复发性血管事件的风险与 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验