• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别心血管事件复发风险极高的血管患者:当前 ACC/AHA 极高危标准的验证。

Identification of vascular patients at very high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events: validation of the current ACC/AHA very high risk criteria.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 14;38(43):3211-3218. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx102.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx102
PMID:28369481
Abstract

AIMS

To validate and assess performance of the current ACC/AHA very high risk criteria in patients with clinically manifest arterial disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were used from the SMART study (n = 7216) and REACH Registry (n = 48 322), two prospective cohorts of patients with manifest atherosclerotic arterial disease. Prevalence and incidence rates of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were calculated, according to the ACC/AHA VHR criteria (cardiovascular disease combined with diabetes, smoking, dyslipidaemia, and/or recent recurrent coronary events). Performance of the ACC/AHA criteria was compared with single very high risk factors in terms of C-statistics and Net Reclassification Index. All patients were at VHR according to the ESC guidelines (incidence of recurrent MACE in SMART was 2.4/100PY, with 95% CI 2.3-2.5/100PY and in REACH 5.1/100PY with 95% CI 5.0-5.3/100PY). In SMART 57% of the patients were at VHR according to the ACC/AHA criteria (incidence of recurrent MACE 2.7/100PY, 95% CI 2.5-2.9/100PY) and in REACH this was 64% (5.9/100PY, 95% CI 5.7-6.1/100PY). The C-statistic for the ACC/AHA VHR criteria was 0.53 in REACH and 0.54 in SMART. Very high risk factors with comparable or slightly better performance were eGFR < 45, polyvascular disease and age >70 years. Around two third of the patients meeting the ACC/AHA VHR criteria had a predicted 10-year risk of recurrent MACE <30%.

CONCLUSION

The ACC/AHA VHR criteria have limited discriminative power. Identifying patients with clinically manifest arterial disease at VHR for recurrent vascular events using eGFR <45, polyvascular disease, or age >70 years performs as well as the ACC/AHA VHR criteria.

摘要

目的

验证并评估当前 ACC/AHA 极高危标准在有临床明显动脉疾病的患者中的表现。

方法和结果

本研究使用了 SMART 研究(n=7216)和 REACH 注册研究(n=48322)的数据,这两个前瞻性队列研究的患者均有明显的动脉粥样硬化性动脉疾病。根据 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准(心血管疾病合并糖尿病、吸烟、血脂异常和/或近期复发性冠状动脉事件),计算复发主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的患病率和发生率。根据 C 统计量和净重新分类指数,比较了 ACC/AHA 标准与单一高危因素的表现。根据 ESC 指南,所有患者均处于 VHR(SMART 中复发 MACE 的发生率为 2.4/100 人年,95%CI 为 2.3-2.5/100 人年,REACH 为 5.1/100 人年,95%CI 为 5.0-5.3/100 人年)。在 SMART 中,根据 ACC/AHA 标准,57%的患者处于 VHR(复发 MACE 的发生率为 2.7/100 人年,95%CI 为 2.5-2.9/100 人年),在 REACH 中,这一比例为 64%(5.9/100 人年,95%CI 为 5.7-6.1/100 人年)。REACH 中 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准的 C 统计量为 0.53,SMART 为 0.54。具有相当或略优性能的高危因素包括 eGFR<45、多血管疾病和年龄>70 岁。符合 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准的患者中,约有三分之二的患者预计 10 年内复发 MACE 的风险<30%。

结论

ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准的区分能力有限。使用 eGFR<45、多血管疾病或年龄>70 岁来识别有临床明显动脉疾病的患者,其处于 VHR 状态以发生复发性血管事件的风险与 ACC/AHA 的 VHR 标准相当。

相似文献

1
Identification of vascular patients at very high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events: validation of the current ACC/AHA very high risk criteria.识别心血管事件复发风险极高的血管患者:当前 ACC/AHA 极高危标准的验证。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 14;38(43):3211-3218. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx102.
2
CAC Score Improves Coronary and CV Risk Assessment Above Statin Indication by ESC and AHA/ACC Primary Prevention Guidelines.CAC 评分提高了 ESC 和 AHA/ACC 一级预防指南中他汀类药物适应证的冠状动脉和心血管风险评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
3
Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in a European cohort.比较 ACC/AHA 指南、成人治疗专家组 III 指南和欧洲心脏病学会指南在欧洲队列中用于心血管疾病预防的应用。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 9;311(14):1416-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2632.
4
Personalizing cardiovascular risk prediction for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.为系统性红斑狼疮患者进行个体化心血管风险预测。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Aug;67:152468. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152468. Epub 2024 May 17.
5
Risk Factors for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events Before Age 65 Years or Within 2.5 Years of a Recent First Cardiovascular Event.65岁之前或近期首次心血管事件发生后2.5年内复发性心血管事件的危险因素。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
Rheumatoid arthritis-specific cardiovascular risk scores are not superior to general risk scores: a validation analysis of patients from seven countries.类风湿关节炎特异性心血管风险评分并不优于一般风险评分:一项对来自七个国家患者的验证分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Jul 1;56(7):1102-1110. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex038.
7
Evaluation of Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events With Biologic Therapy in Patients With Psoriasis.银屑病患者生物治疗的主要不良心血管事件风险评估
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Oct 1;16(10):1002-1013.
8
Prognostic Utility of Risk Enhancers and Coronary Artery Calcium Score Recommended in the 2018 ACC/AHA Multisociety Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines Over the Pooled Cohort Equation: Insights From 3 Large Prospective Cohorts.2018 ACC/AHA 多学会胆固醇治疗指南推荐的风险增强因子和冠状动脉钙评分对汇总队列方程的预后价值:来自 3 个大型前瞻性队列的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun 15;10(12):e019589. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019589. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
Increases in statin eligibility to reduce cardiovascular risk according to the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines in the Africa Middle East region: a sub-analysis of the Africa Middle East Cardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study.根据2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)胆固醇指南,在非洲中东地区提高他汀类药物适用标准以降低心血管风险:非洲中东心血管流行病学(ACE)研究的一项亚组分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1034-2.
10
Risk Categorization Using New American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for Cholesterol Management and Its Relation to Alirocumab Treatment Following Acute Coronary Syndromes.使用新的美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会胆固醇管理指南进行风险分类及其与急性冠状动脉综合征后依洛尤单抗治疗的关系。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 5;140(19):1578-1589. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042551. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism among patients with polyvascular, single-vascular or no atherosclerotic disease: insights from RIETE.多血管、单血管或无动脉粥样硬化疾病患者急性肺栓塞的特征与结局:来自RIETE研究的见解
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02706-4.
2
Single-cell spatial transcriptomics in cardiovascular development, disease, and medicine.心血管发育、疾病与医学中的单细胞空间转录组学
Genes Dis. 2023 Nov 14;11(6):101163. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2023.101163. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Methotrexate and cardiovascular prevention: an appraisal of the current evidence.
甲氨蝶呤与心血管预防:当前证据评价。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;17:17539447231215213. doi: 10.1177/17539447231215213.
4
Management of cardiovascular disease using an mHealth tool: a randomized clinical trial.使用移动健康工具管理心血管疾病:一项随机临床试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Dec 3;4(1):165. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00535-z.
5
Successful Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with High-risk Comorbidities or Lesion Characteristics.高危合并症或病变特征患者的外周血管介入治疗的成功。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Mar 5;23(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01465-8.
6
The incremental value of angiographic features for predicting recurrent cardiovascular events: Insights from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease.血管造影特征对预测复发性心血管事件的增量价值:来自杜克心血管疾病数据库的见解。
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Mar;321:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Impact of polyvascular disease with and without co-existent kidney dysfunction on cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes: A post hoc analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME.合并肾功障碍与无合并肾功障碍的多血管疾病对糖尿病患者心血管结局的影响:来自 EMPA-REG OUTCOME 的事后分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 May;23(5):1173-1181. doi: 10.1111/dom.14326. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Effect of coexisting vascular disease on long-term risk of recurrent events after TIA or stroke.共存血管疾病对 TIA 或中风后复发事件长期风险的影响。
Neurology. 2019 Aug 13;93(7):e695-e707. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007935. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
Estimated Life Expectancy Without Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Vascular Disease: The SMART-REACH Model.血管疾病患者无复发性心血管事件的预期寿命:SMART-REACH 模型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 21;7(16):e009217. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009217.