Suppr超能文献

用于人乳头瘤病毒16型和18型DNA滤膜原位杂交检测的宫颈细胞采样中细胞刷与棉拭子的比较。

Comparison of the Cytobrush and cotton swabs in sampling cervical cells for filter in situ hybridization detection of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 DNA.

作者信息

Peng H Q, Roth P, Caussy D, Rawls W

机构信息

Department of Pathology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1988 May-Jun;32(3):311-3.

PMID:2837033
Abstract

The Cytobrush was compared with the cotton swab for collecting samples used to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 DNA by filter in situ hybridization. The study design entailed collecting two endocervical and one vaginal fornix sample from each of 200 women admitted to a colposcopy clinic. No difference was found in the HPV positivity rates in samples obtained with the two collection instruments. There was good agreement (91.5%) in the detection of viral DNA between the first and second endocervical samples; however, 15% of the patients with positive samples had detectable DNA in their second sample only. Significantly fewer samples from the fornix contained detectable HPV-16 or HPV-18 DNA than did endocervical samples.

摘要

将Cytobrush与棉拭子进行比较,通过滤膜原位杂交收集用于检测16型和18型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA的样本。研究设计要求从200名入住阴道镜检查诊所的女性中,每人采集两份宫颈管内膜样本和一份阴道穹窿样本。使用两种采集工具获得的样本中HPV阳性率没有差异。在首次和第二次宫颈管内膜样本之间,病毒DNA检测结果具有良好的一致性(91.5%);然而,15%的样本呈阳性的患者仅在其第二次样本中检测到DNA。与宫颈管内膜样本相比,穹窿处样本中可检测到HPV-16或HPV-18 DNA的样本明显更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验