Dunlop Adrian J, Brown Amanda L, Oldmeadow Christopher, Harris Anthony, Gill Anthony, Sadler Craig, Ribbons Karen, Attia John, Barker Daniel, Ghijben Peter, Hinman Jennifer, Jackson Melissa, Bell James, Lintzeris Nicholas
Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Centre for Brain and Mental Health, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Clinical Research Design, IT and Statistical Support (CRεDITSS) Unit, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 May 1;174:181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Access to opioid agonist treatment can be associated with extensive waiting periods with significant health and financial burdens. This study aimed to determine whether patients with heroin dependence dispensed buprenorphine-naloxone weekly have greater reductions in heroin use and related adverse health effects 12-weeks after commencing treatment, compared to waitlist controls and to examine the cost-effectiveness of this strategy.
An open-label waitlist RCT was conducted in an opioid treatment clinic in Newcastle, Australia. Fifty patients with DSM-IV-TR heroin dependence (and no other substance dependence) were recruited. The intervention group (n=25) received take-home self-administered sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone weekly (mean dose, 22.7±5.7mg) and weekly clinical review. Waitlist controls (n=25) received no clinical intervention. The primary outcome was heroin use (self-report, urine toxicology verified) at weeks four, eight and 12. The primary cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost per additional heroin-free-day.
Outcome data were available for 80% of all randomized participants. Across the 12-weeks, treatment group heroin use was on average 19.02days less/month (95% CI -22.98, -15.06, p<0.0001). A total 12-week reduction in adjusted costs including crime of $A5,722 (95% CI 3299, 8154) in favor of treatment was observed. Excluding crime, incremental cost per heroin-free-day gained from treatment was $A18.24 (95% CI 4.50, 28.49).
When compared to remaining on a waitlist, take-home self-administered buprenorphine-naloxone treatment is associated with significant reductions in heroin use for people with DSM-IV-TR heroin dependence. This cost-effective approach may be an efficient strategy to enhance treatment capacity.
获得阿片类激动剂治疗可能伴随着漫长的等待期,带来巨大的健康和经济负担。本研究旨在确定与等待名单对照组相比,每周接受丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗的海洛因依赖患者在开始治疗12周后,海洛因使用量及相关不良健康影响的减少幅度是否更大,并检验该策略的成本效益。
在澳大利亚纽卡斯尔的一家阿片类药物治疗诊所进行了一项开放标签的等待名单随机对照试验。招募了50名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(修订版)(DSM-IV-TR)海洛因依赖标准(且无其他物质依赖)的患者。干预组(n = 25)每周接受带回家自行舌下含服的丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(平均剂量,22.7±5.7毫克)及每周一次的临床复查。等待名单对照组(n = 25)未接受临床干预。主要结局指标为第4、8和12周时的海洛因使用情况(自我报告,经尿液毒理学验证)。主要成本效益结局指标为每增加一个无海洛因日的增量成本。
所有随机分组参与者中有80%可获得结局数据。在12周内,治疗组海洛因使用量平均每月减少19.02天(95%可信区间 -22.98,-15.06,p<0.0001)。观察到包括犯罪成本在内,治疗组在12周内调整后的成本总共减少了5722澳元(95%可信区间3299,8154)。排除犯罪成本后,治疗组每获得一个无海洛因日的增量成本为18.24澳元(95%可信区间4.50,28.49)。
与留在等待名单上相比,对于符合DSM-IV-TR海洛因依赖标准的人群,带回家自行舌下含服丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗可显著减少海洛因使用量。这种具有成本效益的方法可能是提高治疗能力的有效策略。