Moon Young Eun, Seok Hyun, Kim Sang-Hyun, Lee Seung Yeol, Yeo Jung Ho
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic University Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(4):779-784. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150405.
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain can cause lower back pain and pelvic discomfort. However, there is no established standard treatment for SIJ pain. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a novel, non-invasive therapeutic modality for musculoskeletal disorders. The mechanism underlying shockwave therapy is not fully understood, but the frequency with which ESWT is applied clinically has increased over the years.
We evaluated the efficacy of using ESWT to treating SIJ pain.
Thirty patients with SIJ pain were assigned randomly to ESWT (n = 15) and sham control (n = 15) groups. The ESWT group received 2,000 shockwaves with energy set to the maximum level tolerable by the patient (energy density = 0.09-0.25 mJ/mm2). The probe was oriented perpendicular to the posterior SIJ line, and moved up and down along the joint line. The sham control group received 2,000 shockwaves with the probe oriented parallel to the posterior SIJ line. A 10-cm numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were assessed before the intervention, and 1 and 4 weeks post-intervention. Participants were instructed to refrain from using any other conservative treatment, including anti-inflammatory medication and other physical modalities during the study.
In the ESWT group, NRS decreased significantly at post-treatment week 4 (3.64 (95% confidence interval, 2.29-4.99)) compared to baseline (6.42 (5.19-7.66); P < 0.05). ODI improved at 1 and 4 weeks compared to baseline, but not significantly. In the sham group, NRS and ODI did not differ at any post-treatment time point. There was a significant group difference in NRS at week 4 post-treatment (3.64 (2.29-4.99) in the ESWT group vs. 6.18 (5.34-7.02) in the sham control group; P < 0.05), but this was not the case for ODI.
ESWT represents a potential therapeutic option for decreasing SIJ pain.
骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛可导致下背部疼痛和骨盆不适。然而,对于SIJ疼痛尚无既定的标准治疗方法。体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)是一种用于肌肉骨骼疾病的新型非侵入性治疗方式。冲击波疗法的潜在机制尚未完全明确,但多年来ESWT在临床上的应用频率有所增加。
我们评估了使用ESWT治疗SIJ疼痛的疗效。
30例SIJ疼痛患者被随机分为ESWT组(n = 15)和假治疗对照组(n = 15)。ESWT组接受2000次冲击波治疗,能量设置为患者可耐受的最大水平(能量密度 = 0.09 - 0.25 mJ/mm2)。探头垂直于SIJ后线定向,并沿关节线上下移动。假治疗对照组接受2000次冲击波治疗,探头平行于SIJ后线定向。在干预前、干预后1周和4周评估10厘米数字评分量表(NRS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)得分。研究期间,参与者被要求避免使用任何其他保守治疗方法,包括抗炎药物和其他物理治疗方式。
在ESWT组,与基线(6.42(5.19 - 7.66))相比,治疗后第4周NRS显著降低(3.64(95%置信区间,2.29 - 4.99);P < 0.05)。与基线相比,ODI在1周和4周时有所改善,但差异不显著。在假治疗对照组,治疗后任何时间点NRS和ODI均无差异。治疗后第4周NRS存在显著的组间差异(ESWT组为3.64(2.29 - 4.99),假治疗对照组为6.18(5.34 - 7.02);P < 0.05),但ODI并非如此。
ESWT是减轻SIJ疼痛的一种潜在治疗选择。