Suppr超能文献

微创骶髂关节融合术、射频神经消融术与保守治疗对骶髂关节痛的 6 年对比性病例系列研究。

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain.

Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan 1;82(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx185.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is an under-recognized condition. Substantial information supports the safety and effectiveness of SIJ fusion (SIJF). Long-term follow-up after SIJF has not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To determine responses to conservative management (CM), SIJ denervation, and SIJF in patients with SIJ pain unresponsive to CM.

METHODS

Retrospective study with long-term (up to 6 yr) follow-up of 137 patients with SIJ pain seen in an outpatient neurosurgery clinic who received either CM (n = 63), sacroiliac denervation (n = 47), or minimally invasive SIJF (n = 27). At each routine clinic visit, patients completed pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index. Additional data were extracted from medical charts.

RESULTS

Patients treated with continued CM had no long-term improvement in pain (mean worsening of 1 point) or disability (mean Oswestry Disability Index worsened by 4-6 points), increased their use of opioids, and had poor long-term work status. SIJF patients had large improvements in SIJ pain (mean 6 points), large improvements in disability (mean 25 points), a decrease in opioid use, and good final work status. Sacroiliac denervation patients had intermediate responses (0-1 and 1-2 points, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients with SIJ pain unresponsive to CM, SIJF resulted in excellent long-term clinical responses, with low opioid use and better work status compared to other treatments.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛是一种未被充分认识的病症。大量资料支持 SIJ 融合(SIJF)的安全性和有效性。尚未报道 SIJF 后的长期随访结果。

目的

确定对保守治疗(CM)、SIJ 去神经支配和 SIJF 无反应的 SIJ 疼痛患者的反应。

方法

对在神经外科门诊就诊的 137 例 SIJ 疼痛患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者接受了 CM(n = 63)、骶髂去神经支配(n = 47)或微创 SIJF(n = 27)治疗,随访时间最长可达 6 年。在每次常规就诊时,患者完成疼痛评分和 Oswestry 残疾指数。从病历中提取其他数据。

结果

接受持续 CM 治疗的患者在疼痛(平均恶化 1 分)或残疾(平均 Oswestry 残疾指数恶化 4-6 分)方面没有长期改善,增加了阿片类药物的使用,并长期工作状态不佳。SIJF 患者的 SIJ 疼痛有较大改善(平均 6 分),残疾有较大改善(平均 25 分),阿片类药物使用减少,最终工作状态良好。骶髂去神经支配患者的反应处于中间水平(分别为 0-1 分和 1-2 分)。

结论

在对 CM 无反应的 SIJ 疼痛患者中,与其他治疗方法相比,SIJF 可获得良好的长期临床反应,阿片类药物使用减少,工作状态更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验