文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

微创骶髂关节融合术、射频神经消融术与保守治疗对骶髂关节痛的 6 年对比性病例系列研究。

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain.

Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan 1;82(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx185.


DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyx185
PMID:28431026
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is an under-recognized condition. Substantial information supports the safety and effectiveness of SIJ fusion (SIJF). Long-term follow-up after SIJF has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine responses to conservative management (CM), SIJ denervation, and SIJF in patients with SIJ pain unresponsive to CM. METHODS: Retrospective study with long-term (up to 6 yr) follow-up of 137 patients with SIJ pain seen in an outpatient neurosurgery clinic who received either CM (n = 63), sacroiliac denervation (n = 47), or minimally invasive SIJF (n = 27). At each routine clinic visit, patients completed pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index. Additional data were extracted from medical charts. RESULTS: Patients treated with continued CM had no long-term improvement in pain (mean worsening of 1 point) or disability (mean Oswestry Disability Index worsened by 4-6 points), increased their use of opioids, and had poor long-term work status. SIJF patients had large improvements in SIJ pain (mean 6 points), large improvements in disability (mean 25 points), a decrease in opioid use, and good final work status. Sacroiliac denervation patients had intermediate responses (0-1 and 1-2 points, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with SIJ pain unresponsive to CM, SIJF resulted in excellent long-term clinical responses, with low opioid use and better work status compared to other treatments.

摘要

背景:骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛是一种未被充分认识的病症。大量资料支持 SIJ 融合(SIJF)的安全性和有效性。尚未报道 SIJF 后的长期随访结果。

目的:确定对保守治疗(CM)、SIJ 去神经支配和 SIJF 无反应的 SIJ 疼痛患者的反应。

方法:对在神经外科门诊就诊的 137 例 SIJ 疼痛患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者接受了 CM(n = 63)、骶髂去神经支配(n = 47)或微创 SIJF(n = 27)治疗,随访时间最长可达 6 年。在每次常规就诊时,患者完成疼痛评分和 Oswestry 残疾指数。从病历中提取其他数据。

结果:接受持续 CM 治疗的患者在疼痛(平均恶化 1 分)或残疾(平均 Oswestry 残疾指数恶化 4-6 分)方面没有长期改善,增加了阿片类药物的使用,并长期工作状态不佳。SIJF 患者的 SIJ 疼痛有较大改善(平均 6 分),残疾有较大改善(平均 25 分),阿片类药物使用减少,最终工作状态良好。骶髂去神经支配患者的反应处于中间水平(分别为 0-1 分和 1-2 分)。

结论:在对 CM 无反应的 SIJ 疼痛患者中,与其他治疗方法相比,SIJF 可获得良好的长期临床反应,阿片类药物使用减少,工作状态更好。

相似文献

[1]
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.

Neurosurgery. 2018-1-1

[2]
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.

Pain Physician. 2017-9

[3]
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.

Eur Spine J. 2017-3

[4]
Predictors of Outcome in Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Pain Originating From the Sacroiliac Joint: A Pooled Analysis.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017-11-1

[5]
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

Eur Spine J. 2018-12-18

[6]
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-8-23

[7]
Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.

Spine J. 2024-5

[8]
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.

Neurosurg Focus. 2013-7

[9]
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.

Neurosurgery. 2015-11

[10]
First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.

Technol Health Care. 2022

引用本文的文献

[1]
The effect of 3D virtual surgical planning in sacroiliac joint fusion.

Brain Spine. 2025-7-22

[2]
Management of sacroiliac joint pain: current concepts.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025-5-21

[3]
Clinical outcome measures following lateral versus posterior sacroiliac joint fusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Brain Spine. 2025-2-12

[4]
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Int Med Res. 2025-2

[5]
The effectiveness and safety of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN): A systematic review.

Interv Pain Med. 2023-6-16

[6]
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.

J Pain Res. 2024-5-3

[7]
Study protocol for a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial to investigate the influence of peripheral nerve stimulation on patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome (SILENCING).

Trials. 2024-3-28

[8]
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Can J Surg. 2024-1-26

[9]
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.

Int J Spine Surg. 2023-12-26

[10]
The Specifics of Non-specific Low Back Pain: Re-evaluating the Current Paradigm to Improve Patient Outcomes.

Anesth Pain Med. 2022-11-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索