• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挽救性机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:14例经验

Salvage Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience with 14 Cases.

作者信息

Ou Yen-Chuan, Hung Sheng-Chun, Hwang Li-Hua, Yang Chun-Kuang, Hung Siu-Wan, Tung Min-Che

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Department of Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2017 Apr;37(4):2045-2050. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11550.

DOI:10.21873/anticanres.11550
PMID:28373480
Abstract

AIM

To report the outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (S-RaRP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients underwent S-RaRP. The mean initial prostatic-specific antigen level was 14.3 ng/ml and mean Gleason score was 6.93. Initial definitive treatment was external irradiation in 11 cases, cyberknife in two, and high-intensity focused ultrasound in one. Time from definitive treatment to S-RaRP was a mean of 36.5 months.

RESULTS

The mean console time was 134.9 min and blood loss was 99.6 ml. Stage pT2N0, T3N0, and T3N1 were found in eight, four, and two cases, respectively. A positive surgical margin was found in 21.4% (3/14) of the patients. The continence rate was 71.4% (10/14). Mild stress urinary incontinence (one or two pads/day) was noted in 28.6% (4/14) of patients. Biochemical recurrence-free status was noted in 11 (78.5%) patients with a mean follow-up of 32.4 months.

CONCLUSION

S-RaRP is feasible with a low complication rate, good continence rate, and an acceptable potency rate. The short-term oncological outcomes are encouraging.

摘要

目的

报告挽救性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(S-RaRP)的结果。

患者与方法

14例患者接受了S-RaRP。初始前列腺特异性抗原平均水平为14.3 ng/ml,Gleason评分平均为6.93。初始确定性治疗中,11例为体外照射,2例为射波刀治疗,1例为高强度聚焦超声治疗。从确定性治疗到S-RaRP的时间平均为36.5个月。

结果

平均控制台操作时间为134.9分钟,失血量为99.6毫升。分别有8例、4例和2例患者病理分期为pT2N0、T3N0和T3N1。21.4%(3/14)的患者切缘阳性。控尿率为71.4%(10/14)。28.6%(4/14)的患者出现轻度压力性尿失禁(每天使用1或2片尿垫)。11例(78.5%)患者生化无复发生存状态良好,平均随访32.4个月。

结论

S-RaRP可行,并发症发生率低,控尿率良好,性功能保留率可接受。短期肿瘤学结果令人鼓舞。

相似文献

1
Salvage Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience with 14 Cases.挽救性机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:14例经验
Anticancer Res. 2017 Apr;37(4):2045-2050. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11550.
2
Salvage robot assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity matched study of perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes.挽救性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:一项关于围手术期、肿瘤学及功能结局的倾向匹配研究
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;41(11):1540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
3
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术细节、肿瘤学及功能结果:400例患者,至少随访12个月
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
4
Complications and outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience.挽救性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的并发症和结局:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):769-76. doi: 10.1111/bju.12595.
5
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
6
[Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的初步结果比较
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Sep;104(5):635-43. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.104.635.
7
A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的直接比较:单机构经验
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.111. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
8
Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和控尿效果:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的尿失禁情况
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(2):103-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590500368120.
10
Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of pure versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon.单一外科医生进行的单纯腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学及功能结果比较
Scand J Urol. 2013 Feb;47(1):10-8. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.696137. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Salvage Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the last decade: systematic review and perspectives of referral centers.近十年挽救性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果:系统回顾及转诊中心的观点。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Nov-Dec;49(6):677-687. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0467.
2
Comparing open and robotic salvage radical prostatectomy after radiotherapy: predictors and outcomes.放疗后开放性与机器人辅助挽救性根治性前列腺切除术的比较:预测因素与结果
Prostate Int. 2021 Mar;9(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
3
Is it worth to perform salvage radical prostatectomy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer? A literature review.
对于放射性复发的前列腺癌,行挽救性前列腺根治切除术是否值得?文献回顾。
World J Urol. 2019 Aug;37(8):1469-1483. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02749-z. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
4
Outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy following more than one failed local therapy.多次局部治疗失败后的挽救性根治性前列腺切除术的结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 May;59(3):152-157. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.3.152. Epub 2018 Mar 20.