Mehrotra Devan V, Fan Li, Liu Fang, Tsai Kuenhi
Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA, USA.
Pharm Stat. 2017 May;16(3):218-227. doi: 10.1002/pst.1806. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Since the implementation of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 guideline in 2005, regulators have required a "thorough QTc" (TQT) study for evaluating the effects of investigational drugs on delayed cardiac repolarization as manifested by a prolonged QTc interval. However, TQT studies have increasingly been viewed unfavorably because of their low cost effectiveness. Several researchers have noted that a robust drug concentration-QTc (conc-QTc) modeling assessment in early phase development should, in most cases, obviate the need for a subsequent TQT study. In December 2015, ICH released an "E14 Q&As (R3)" document supporting the use of conc-QTc modeling for regulatory decisions. In this article, we propose a simple improvement of two popular conc-QTc assessment methods for typical first-in-human crossover-like single ascending dose clinical pharmacology trials. The improvement is achieved, in part, by leveraging routinely encountered (and expected) intrasubject correlation patterns encountered in such trials. A real example involving a single ascending dose and corresponding TQT trial, along with results from a simulation study, illustrate the strong performance of the proposed method. The improved conc-QTc assessment will further enable highly reliable go/no-go decisions in early phase clinical development and deliver results that support subsequent TQT study waivers by regulators.
自2005年国际协调会议(ICH)E14指南实施以来,监管机构要求开展一项“全面QTc”(TQT)研究,以评估研究药物对QTc间期延长所体现的延迟心脏复极的影响。然而,由于成本效益较低,TQT研究越来越不被看好。几位研究人员指出,在早期开发阶段进行强有力的药物浓度-QTc(浓度-QTc)建模评估,在大多数情况下,应可避免后续进行TQT研究的必要性。2015年12月,ICH发布了一份“E14问答(R3)”文件,支持将浓度-QTc建模用于监管决策。在本文中,我们针对典型的首次人体交叉式单剂量递增临床药理学试验,对两种常用的浓度-QTc评估方法提出了一种简单的改进。这种改进部分是通过利用此类试验中经常遇到(且预期会出现)的受试者内相关性模式来实现的。一个涉及单剂量递增及相应TQT试验的实际例子,以及一项模拟研究的结果,说明了所提出方法的强大性能。改进后的浓度-QTc评估将进一步使早期临床开发中能够做出高度可靠的通过/不通过决策,并提供支持监管机构随后免除TQT研究的结果。