Pignolo Claudia, Giromini Luciano, Ando' Agata, Ghirardello Davide, Di Girolamo Marzia, Ales Francesca, Zennaro Alessandro
a Department of Psychology , University of Turin , Italy.
J Pers Assess. 2017 Nov-Dec;99(6):619-625. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1296844. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
Recently, the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS; Meyer, Viglione, Mihura, Erard, & Erdberg, 2011 ) was introduced to overcome some possible limitations of the Comprehensive System (CS; Exner, 2003 ) while continuing its efforts to link Rorschach inferences to their evidence base. An important, technical modification to the scoring system is that R-PAS interpretations are based on both standard scores and complexity-adjusted scores. Two previous U.S. studies reported good to excellent interrater reliability (IRR) for the great majority of R-PAS variables; however, IRR of complexity-adjusted scores has never been investigated. Furthermore, no studies have yet investigated R-PAS IRR in Europe. To extend this literature, we examined R-PAS IRR of Page 1 and Page 2 raw and complexity-adjusted scores with 112 Italian Rorschach protocols. We collected a large sample of both clinical and nonclinical Rorschach protocols, each of which was coded separately by 2 independent raters. Results demonstrated a mean intraclass correlation of .78 (SD = .14) for raw scores and.74 (SD = .14) for complexity-adjusted scores. Overall, for both raw and complexity-adjusted values, most of the variables were characterized by good to excellent IRR.
最近，罗夏墨迹测验表现评估系统（R-PAS；迈耶、维利奥内、米胡拉、埃拉德和埃德伯格，2011年）被引入，以克服综合系统（CS；埃克斯纳，2003年）可能存在的一些局限性，同时继续努力将罗夏墨迹测验的推断与其证据基础联系起来。评分系统的一项重要技术改进是，R-PAS的解释基于标准分数和复杂度调整分数。此前两项美国研究报告称，绝大多数R-PAS变量的评分者间信度（IRR）良好至优秀；然而，复杂度调整分数的IRR从未被研究过。此外，尚未有研究在欧洲调查R-PAS的IRR。为了拓展这方面的文献，我们用112份意大利罗夏墨迹测验记录，检验了第1页和第2页原始分数及复杂度调整分数的R-PAS IRR。我们收集了大量临床和非临床罗夏墨迹测验记录样本，每个样本均由两名独立评分者分别编码。结果显示，原始分数的组内相关系数均值为0.78（标准差=0.14），复杂度调整分数的组内相关系数均值为0.74（标准差=0.14）。总体而言，对于原始分数和复杂度调整分数，大多数变量的IRR均良好至优秀。
