Tickle M, O'Neill C, Donaldson M, Birch S, Noble S, Killough S, Murphy L, Greer M, Brodison J, Verghis R, Worthington H V
1 Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
2 Centre for Public Health, Queens' University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(7):741-746. doi: 10.1177/0022034517702330. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
We conducted a parallel group randomized controlled trial of children initially aged 2 to 3 y who were caries free, to prevent the children becoming caries active over the subsequent 36 mo. The setting was 22 dental practices in Northern Ireland, and children were randomly assigned by a clinical trials unit (CTU) (using computer-generated random numbers, with allocation concealed from the dental practice until each child was recruited) to the intervention (22,600-ppm fluoride varnish, toothbrush, 50-mL tube of 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpaste, and standardized, evidence-based prevention advice) or advice-only control at 6-monthly intervals. The primary outcome measure was conversion from caries-free to caries-active states. Secondary outcome measures were number of decayed, missing, or filled teeth (dmfs) in caries-active children, number of episodes of pain, and number of extracted teeth. Adverse reactions were recorded. Calibrated external examiners, blinded to the child's study group, assessed the status of the children at baseline and after 3 y. In total, 1,248 children (624 randomized to each group) were recruited, and 1,096 (549 intervention, 547 control) were included in the final analyses. Eighty-seven percent of intervention and 86% of control children attended every 6-mo visit ( P = 0.77). A total of 187 (34%) in the intervention group converted to caries active compared to 213 (39%) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.04; P = 0.11). Mean dmfs of those with caries in the intervention group was 7.2 compared to 9.6 in the control group ( P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the number of episodes of pain between groups ( P = 0.81) or in the number of teeth extracted in caries-active children ( P = 0.95). Ten children in the intervention group had adverse reactions of a minor nature. This well-conducted trial failed to demonstrate that the intervention kept children caries free, but there was evidence that once children get caries, it slowed down its progression (EudraCT No: 2009-010725-39; ISRCTN: ISRCTN36180119).
我们对最初年龄在2至3岁且无龋齿的儿童进行了一项平行组随机对照试验,以预防这些儿童在随后的36个月内患龋活跃。研究地点为北爱尔兰的22家牙科诊所,儿童由一个临床试验单位(CTU)随机分配(使用计算机生成的随机数,在每个儿童被招募前对牙科诊所隐瞒分配情况),每6个月接受一次干预(22,600 ppm氟化物 varnish、牙刷、50毫升含1,450 ppm氟化物的牙膏以及标准化的、基于证据的预防建议)或仅接受建议的对照。主要结局指标是从无龋状态转变为患龋活跃状态。次要结局指标是患龋活跃儿童的龋失补牙数(dmfs)、疼痛发作次数以及拔牙数。记录不良反应情况。经过校准的外部检查人员在不知道儿童所在研究组的情况下,在基线和3年后评估儿童的状况。总共招募了1,248名儿童(每组随机分配624名),最终分析纳入了1,096名儿童(549名干预组儿童,547名对照组儿童)。干预组87%的儿童和对照组86%的儿童每6个月就诊一次(P = 0.77)。干预组共有187名(34%)儿童转变为患龋活跃,而对照组为213名(39%)(优势比为0.81;95%置信区间为0.64 - 1.04;P = 0.11)。干预组患龋儿童的平均dmfs为7.2,而对照组为9.6(P = 0.007)。两组之间的疼痛发作次数(P = 0.81)或患龋活跃儿童的拔牙数(P = 0.95)没有显著差异。干预组有10名儿童出现轻微不良反应。这项实施良好的试验未能证明干预能使儿童保持无龋状态,但有证据表明,一旦儿童患龋,干预会减缓龋齿的进展(欧洲临床试验注册号:2009 - 010725 - 39;国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN36180119)。