• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代实践中患者层面因素对手术阴道分娩候选者分娩方式的影响。

Influence of Patient-Level Factors on Mode of Delivery among Operative Vaginal Delivery Candidates in Modern Practice.

作者信息

Metz Torri D, Gonzalez Christina, Allshouse Amanda A, Henry Erick, Esplin Sean

机构信息

University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2017 Aug;34(10):974-981. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601441. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1601441
PMID:28376550
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate which patient-level factors influence mode of delivery among candidates for operative vaginal delivery.  Cross-sectional study of candidates for operative vaginal delivery from 18 hospitals over 8 years. Probabilities of mode of delivery were estimated using hierarchical logistic modeling adjusting for clustering within physician and hospital.  Total 3,771 (64%) women delivered with forceps, 1,474 (25%) vacuums, and 665 (11%) cesareans. Odds of forceps versus vacuum were higher with induction (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.76-2.65), nulliparity (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.59-2.66), epidural (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.19-3.56), maternal indication (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.16-2.02), older maternal age (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.31 per 5 years), and longer second stage (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20 per hour).Odds of cesarean versus operative vaginal delivery were higher with maternal indication (OR = 9.0, 95% CI: 7.23-11.20), a perinatologist (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.09-5.78), longer second stage (OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.65-1.93 per hour), older gestational age (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20 per week), and longer labor (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04 per hour).  Patient-level factors influence the decision to proceed with an operative vaginal delivery and the choice of instrument, thereby emphasizing the importance of maintaining availability of both forceps and vacuums.

摘要

我们旨在评估哪些患者层面的因素会影响接受阴道助产的产妇的分娩方式。对来自18家医院的8年间接受阴道助产的产妇进行横断面研究。使用分层逻辑模型估计分娩方式的概率,并对医生和医院内部的聚类情况进行了调整。总共有3771名(64%)女性通过产钳助产,1474名(25%)通过真空吸引助产,665名(11%)通过剖宫产。与真空吸引相比,产钳助产的几率在引产时更高(比值比[OR]=2.16,95%置信区间[CI]:1.76-2.65)、初产妇(OR=2.06,95%CI:1.59-2.66)、硬膜外麻醉(OR=2.05,95%CI:1.19-3.56)、产妇指征(OR=1.53,95%CI 1.16-2.02)、产妇年龄较大(每5岁OR 1.18,95%CI 1.06-1.31)以及第二产程较长(每小时OR=1.10,95%CI:1.01-1.20)。与阴道助产相比,剖宫产的几率在产妇指征(OR=9.0,95%CI:7.23-11.20)、围产医学专家参与(OR=2.51,95%CI:1.09-5.78)、第二产程较长(每小时OR=1.79,95%CI:1.65-1.93)、孕周较大(每周OR=1.10,95%CI:1.01-1.20)以及产程较长(每小时OR=1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.04)时更高。患者层面的因素会影响进行阴道助产的决策以及器械的选择,从而强调了同时备有产钳和真空吸引器的重要性。

相似文献

1
Influence of Patient-Level Factors on Mode of Delivery among Operative Vaginal Delivery Candidates in Modern Practice.现代实践中患者层面因素对手术阴道分娩候选者分娩方式的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Aug;34(10):974-981. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601441. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
2
Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.产妇年龄与足月急诊剖宫产术:一项基于人群的低危初产妇队列研究。
BJOG. 2015 Nov;122(12):1642-51. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12962. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
3
Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Forceps and Vacuum Delivery at Outlet, Low, and Midpelvic Station.出口、低位及中骨盆平面产钳及胎头吸引助产相关的发病率和死亡率
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Mar;41(3):327-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
4
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.器械助产:法国妇产科学院临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
Effects of maternal obesity on the success of assisted vaginal delivery in Chinese women.母亲肥胖对中国女性辅助阴道分娩成功率的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2151-0.
6
Choosing between bad, worse and worst: what is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?在糟糕、更糟和最糟之间做出选择:第二产程失败时首选的分娩方式是什么?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Aug;30(15):1861-1864. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1228058. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?对失败的恐惧:我们在产房进行的器械助产操作是否过多?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848.
8
Nulliparous Women in the Second Stage of Labor: Changes in Delivery Outcomes Between Two Cohorts From 2000 and 2011.未生育女性分娩第二产程:2000年与2011年两个队列分娩结局的变化
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):81-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000872.
9
Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications.个体及序贯式器械阴道助产失败:相关危险因素及母儿并发症
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Jul;82(7):642-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00162.x.
10
Descent of fetal head during active pushing: secondary analysis of prospective cohort study investigating ultrasound examination before operative vaginal delivery.胎儿头部在主动分娩时下移:前瞻性队列研究超声检查在经阴道分娩中的二次分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):524-529. doi: 10.1002/uog.20348.

引用本文的文献

1
Can the cervical length in mid-trimester predict the use of vacuum in vaginal delivery?孕中期的宫颈长度能否预测阴道分娩时使用真空吸引器的情况?
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jan;63(1):35-41. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.35. Epub 2019 Dec 26.