• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

托法替布与生物制剂治疗对非生物改善病情抗风湿药反应不足的中重度类风湿关节炎患者的疗效比较:系统文献综述与网状meta分析

Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Bergrath Evelien, Gerber Robert A, Gruben David, Lukic Tatjana, Makin Charles, Wallenstein Gene

机构信息

Mapi, Boston, MA, USA.

Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.

出版信息

Int J Rheumatol. 2017;2017:8417249. doi: 10.1155/2017/8417249. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1155/2017/8417249
PMID:28377787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5362710/
Abstract

. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as monotherapy and combined with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) versus biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and other novel DMARDs for second-line moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by means of a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA). . MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and March 2015. Efficacy data based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at 6 months, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events were analyzed by means of Bayesian NMAs. . 45 RCTs were identified, the majority of which demonstrated a low risk of bias. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) and 10 mg BID monotherapy exhibited comparable efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events versus other monotherapies. Tofacitinib 5 mg BID and 10 mg BID + DMARDs or methotrexate (MTX) were mostly comparable to other combination therapies in terms of efficacy and discontinuation due to adverse events. . In most cases, tofacitinib had similar efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared to biologic DMARDs.

摘要

通过系统文献综述(SLR)和网状Meta分析(NMA),比较托法替布(一种用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的口服Janus激酶抑制剂)作为单药治疗以及与改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)联合使用,相对于生物DMARDs(bDMARDs)和其他新型DMARDs,用于二线中重度类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效和耐受性。检索MEDLINE®、EMBASE®和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,以识别1990年至2015年3月期间发表的随机临床试验(RCTs)。基于美国风湿病学会(ACR)反应标准的疗效数据、6个月时健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)的改善情况以及因不良事件导致的停药率,通过贝叶斯网状Meta分析进行分析。共识别出45项RCTs,其中大多数显示偏倚风险较低。托法替布5mg每日两次(BID)和10mg BID单药治疗在疗效和因不良事件导致的停药率方面与其他单药治疗相当。托法替布5mg BID和10mg BID + DMARDs或甲氨蝶呤(MTX)在疗效和因不良事件导致的停药率方面大多与其他联合治疗相当。在大多数情况下,托法替布与生物DMARDs相比,在疗效和因不良事件导致的停药率方面相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/4a3ea01a3806/IJR2017-8417249.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/6efd49f64859/IJR2017-8417249.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/0c8b87137b9e/IJR2017-8417249.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/c04e9f5bb676/IJR2017-8417249.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/4a3ea01a3806/IJR2017-8417249.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/6efd49f64859/IJR2017-8417249.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/0c8b87137b9e/IJR2017-8417249.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/c04e9f5bb676/IJR2017-8417249.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e4a/5362710/4a3ea01a3806/IJR2017-8417249.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.托法替布与生物制剂治疗对非生物改善病情抗风湿药反应不足的中重度类风湿关节炎患者的疗效比较:系统文献综述与网状meta分析
Int J Rheumatol. 2017;2017:8417249. doi: 10.1155/2017/8417249. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
Tofacitinib Versus Biologic Treatments in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Results From a Network Meta-analysis.托法替布与生物制剂治疗对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂反应不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效比较:网状Meta分析结果
Clin Ther. 2016 Dec;38(12):2628-2641.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
3
Network Meta-Analysis of Tofacitinib, Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs, and Apremilast for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.托法替布、生物性改善病情抗风湿药和阿普米司特治疗银屑病关节炎的网状Meta分析
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020 Aug 12;93:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2020.100601. eCollection 2020.
4
Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of Latin American patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Pooled efficacy and safety analyses of Phase 3 and long-term extension studies.托法替布,一种口服的 Janus 激酶抑制剂,用于治疗拉丁美洲类风湿关节炎患者:3 期和长期扩展研究的汇总疗效及安全性分析
Reumatol Clin. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial.托法替布联合非生物性疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗活动期类风湿关节炎患者的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):253-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006.
6
Systematic review of tofacitinib: a new drug for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.托法替布的系统评价:一种用于治疗类风湿关节炎的新药
Clin Ther. 2014 Jul 1;36(7):1074-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.018.
7
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
8
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较托法替布和乌帕替尼在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;22(8):1563-1571. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13616. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
Network meta-analysis of tofacitinib versus biologic treatments in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis patients.托法替布与生物制剂治疗中重度类风湿关节炎患者的网状 Meta 分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Jun;44(3):384-396. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12795. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.托法替布与巴瑞替尼治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;78(6):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s00393-018-0531-5.

引用本文的文献

1
2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.《2018年中国类风湿关节炎诊疗指南》
Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2021 Apr 13;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.2478/rir-2021-0002. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Quality of life and disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis on tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapies.托法替尼与生物制剂类改善病情抗风湿药治疗类风湿关节炎患者的生活质量和疾病活动度。
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Oct;42(10):1775-1783. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05163-8. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 12- and 24-week results of a phase 3 trial.

本文引用的文献

1
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2015年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):1-25. doi: 10.1002/acr.22783. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
2
Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial.托法替布联合非生物性疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗活动期类风湿关节炎患者的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):253-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006.
3
Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials.
接受生物改善病情抗风湿药物治疗反应不佳的类风湿关节炎患者中,upadacitinib 对比 abatacept 的患者报告结局:一项 3 期试验的 12 周和 24 周结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jun 24;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02813-x.
4
Efficacy, retention, and safety of tofacitinib in real-life: Hur-bio monocentric experience.托法替布在实际应用中的疗效、保留率及安全性:Hur-bio单中心经验
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Feb 26;51(1):297-308. doi: 10.3906/sag-2007-123.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Tofacitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in China.托法替布治疗中国中重度类风湿关节炎患者的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Dec;38(12):1345-1358. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00961-z. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future.JAK 抑制剂治疗类风湿关节炎:聚焦当下,展望未来。
Biomolecules. 2020 Jul 5;10(7):1002. doi: 10.3390/biom10071002.
7
Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland.瑞士观察性队列类风湿关节炎患者中抗肿瘤坏死因子药物、具有替代作用模式的生物制剂和托法替尼的疗效比较。
RMD Open. 2020 May;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001174.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment sequences containing tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.西班牙含托法替布治疗序列用于类风湿关节炎治疗的成本效益分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;39(10):2919-2930. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05087-3. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
9
Patient-reported outcomes for tofacitinib with and without methotrexate, or adalimumab with methotrexate, in rheumatoid arthritis: a phase IIIB/IV trial.托法替布联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤,或阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的患者报告结局:一项 IIIB/IV 期试验。
RMD Open. 2019 Oct 1;5(2):e001040. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001040. eCollection 2019.
10
Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data from the St. Gallen and Aarau Cohorts.托法替布治疗类风湿关节炎的有效性、耐受性及安全性:来自圣加仑和阿劳队列的真实世界数据回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 26;8(10):1548. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101548.
证据综合决策 4:基于随机对照试验的证据网络中的不一致性。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):641-56. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12455847.
4
Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate: twelve-month data from a twenty-four-month phase III randomized radiographic study.托法替布(CP-690,550)用于接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的类风湿关节炎患者:一项为期24个月的III期随机影像学研究的12个月数据。
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):559-70. doi: 10.1002/art.37816.
5
Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial.托法替尼(CP-690,550)联合甲氨蝶呤治疗肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂应答不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者:一项随机 3 期试验。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):451-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
6
Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.证据综合决策 2:用于随机对照试验的成对和网络荟萃分析的广义线性建模框架。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):607-17. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12458724. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
7
Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis.托法替尼或阿达木单抗与安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072.
8
Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.托法替尼单药治疗类风湿关节炎的安慰剂对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):495-507. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071.
9
2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.2008年美国风湿病学会关于使用改善病情抗风湿药和生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎的建议的2012年更新版。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 May;64(5):625-39. doi: 10.1002/acr.21641.
10
A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus placebo in combination with background methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate alone.一项IIb期剂量范围研究,比较口服JAK抑制剂托法替布(CP-690,550)与安慰剂联合背景甲氨蝶呤,用于对甲氨蝶呤单药治疗反应不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者。
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):970-81. doi: 10.1002/art.33419. Epub 2011 Oct 17.