• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自“掠夺性期刊”的稿件提交邀请:作者该怎么做?

Manuscript Submission Invitations from 'Predatory Journals': What Should Authors Do?

作者信息

Kebede Mihiretu, Schmaus-Klughammer Anna E, Tekle Brook Tesfaye

机构信息

Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2017 May;32(5):709-712. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.709.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.709
PMID:28378541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5383600/
Abstract

Press freedom and worldwide internet access have opened ample opportunity for a staggering number of poor open access journals and junk publishers to emerge. Dubious publishers are abusing and camouflaging the golden open access model. In 2012, Jeffery Beall shed light on the predatory journals (as he preferred to call them) and the threat to open access scientific publication. Publishing in predatory journals is continuing to be a major threat for the development of science in developing countries. The authors of this article proposed solutions and outline a fresh perspective to help authors avoid publishing in predatory journals.

摘要

新闻自由和全球互联网接入为大量劣质开放获取期刊和垃圾出版商的涌现创造了充足机会。可疑出版商正在滥用和伪装黄金开放获取模式。2012年,杰弗里·比尔揭示了掠夺性期刊(他更喜欢这样称呼它们)以及对开放获取科学出版的威胁。在掠夺性期刊上发表文章仍然是发展中国家科学发展的一大威胁。本文作者提出了解决方案,并勾勒出一个全新视角,以帮助作者避免在掠夺性期刊上发表文章。

相似文献

1
Manuscript Submission Invitations from 'Predatory Journals': What Should Authors Do?来自“掠夺性期刊”的稿件提交邀请:作者该怎么做?
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 May;32(5):709-712. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.709.
2
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
3
Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation.康复领域的掠夺性开放获取
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.假金:安全浏览开放获取出版以避免掠夺性出版商和期刊。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
What I learned from predatory publishers.我从掠夺性出版商那里学到的东西。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):273-278. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.029.
6
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
7
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.潜在的掠夺性和正规生物医学期刊:你能区分出来吗?一项横断面比较。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
8
Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine.危重病医学中的掠夺性开放获取出版。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:247-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
9
How to Recognize and Avoid Potential, Possible, or Probable Predatory Open-Access Publishers, Standalone, and Hijacked Journals.如何识别并避免潜在的、可能的或很可能的掠夺性开放获取出版商、独立期刊及被劫持期刊。
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2016 Nov 1;37(2-3):5-13. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2016-0011.
10
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.在掠夺性期刊上发表文章的伦理问题。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):279-284. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030.

引用本文的文献

1
A Toolkit for Detecting Fallacious Calls for Papers from Potential Predatory Journals.识别潜在掠夺性期刊虚假征稿通知的工具包
Adv Pharm Bull. 2023 Nov;13(4):627-634. doi: 10.34172/apb.2023.068. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Effect of an educational intervention on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center towards predatory publishers.教育干预对侯赛因国王癌症中心医护人员对掠夺性出版商的知识、态度和实践的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 22;23(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04312-2.
3
Becoming a high impact journal.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities.发表更多论文的压力与掠夺性出版活动的范围。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(12):1874-1878. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.12.1874.
2
Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee.区分合法与掠夺性开放获取期刊:国际急诊医学联合会研究委员会报告
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):497-507. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.7.30328. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research.
成为一本高影响力期刊。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2020 Dec 31;39(4):379-380. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.20.221.
4
Improving Scientific Writing Skills and Publishing Capacity by Developing University-Based Editing System and Writing Programs.通过建立基于大学的编辑系统和写作计划来提高科学写作技巧和出版能力。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Dec 28;34(1):e9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e9. eCollection 2019 Jan 7.
5
Predatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science.掠夺性期刊:毫无价值的生物医学科学的兴起。
J Postgrad Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;64(4):226-231. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_347_18.
6
Influence of Internet and Social Media in the Promotion of Alternative Oncology, Cancer Quackery, and the Predatory Publishing Phenomenon.互联网和社交媒体对替代肿瘤学、癌症江湖医术及掠夺性出版现象推广的影响。
Cureus. 2018 May 13;10(5):e2617. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2617.
7
How can emergency physicians protect their work in the era of pseudo publishing?在伪发表的时代,急诊医生如何保护他们的工作成果?
Turk J Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):11-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2017.11.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Problems and challenges of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊的问题与挑战。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15039. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Are We as Otorhinolaryngologists Aware of the Danger of Predatory Journals?作为耳鼻喉科医生,我们是否意识到掠夺性期刊的危险?
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;55(3):95-98. doi: 10.5152/tao.2017.201702. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
危险的掠夺性出版商威胁医学研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Oct;31(10):1511-3. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1511.
4
"FakeBooks"--predatory journals: The dark side of publishing.“假刊”——掠夺性期刊:出版业的阴暗面。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;64(2):107-8. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.179733.
5
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
6
Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals.待售的科学:掠夺性期刊的兴起。
J R Soc Med. 2014 Oct;107(10):384-5. doi: 10.1177/0141076814548526.
7
Impact factor of a scientific journal: Is it a measure of quality of research?科学期刊的影响因子:它是研究质量的一种衡量标准吗?
J Med Phys. 2013 Oct;38(4):155-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.121191.
8
Open access under scrutiny.接受审查的开放获取
J Radiol Prot. 2013 Dec;33(4):885-6. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/4/M01. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
9
Who's afraid of peer review?谁害怕同行评审?
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5. doi: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60.
10
Open access to scientific research: where are we and where are we going? Facts and figures on the occasion of the 2010 Open Access Week (October 18-24).开放获取科学研究:我们在哪里,我们要去哪里?2010 年开放获取周(10 月 18 日至 24 日)之际的事实和数据。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Sep;46(3):461-9.