He Wei, Huang Rong-Rong, Shi Qing-Yu, Liu Xian-Bao, Wang Jian-An, Yan Min
Department of Anesthesia, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017;18(4):353-359. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600522.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive therapy for elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who were refused surgical aortic valve replacement because of the high perioperative risk. Traditionally, this procedure has been done under general anesthesia, but more recently local anesthesia and sedation have become popular. This research assessed the effectiveness of transfemoral TAVI under bispectral index (BIS)-guided sedation.
In this single-center retrospective control analysis, clinical data, including demographic characteristics, echocardiography, periprocedural data, and main complications, were collected and assessed in 113 patients undergoing TAVI through the femoral artery under general anesthesia (GA group, n=36) and under BIS-guided sedation (SED group, n=77).
The demographic characteristics and echocardiographic parameters between the two groups were similar (P>0.05). Two (2.6%) of patients were moved from BIS-guided sedation to general anesthesia for surgical reasons. Procedures were significantly shorter in the SED group than in the GA group ((127.10±44.43) min vs. (165.90±71.62) min, P=0.004). Patients in the SED group lost less blood and received significantly fewer red blood cells and catecholamines than those in the GA group (5.19% vs. 22.22%, P=0.017 and 67.53% vs. 97.22%, P<0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter and there were fewer pulmonary complications in the SED group than in the GA group. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the two groups.
BIS-guided sedation is a feasible and safe approach for transfemoral TAVI. The anesthesiologist should choose the best anesthetic method according to the team's experience.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是一种针对因围手术期风险高而拒绝接受外科主动脉瓣置换术的老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的微创治疗方法。传统上,该手术在全身麻醉下进行,但最近局部麻醉和镇静变得流行起来。本研究评估了在脑电双频指数(BIS)引导下镇静的经股动脉TAVI的有效性。
在这项单中心回顾性对照分析中,收集并评估了113例经股动脉接受TAVI的患者的临床数据,包括人口统计学特征、超声心动图、围手术期数据和主要并发症,这些患者分别接受全身麻醉(GA组,n = 36)和BIS引导下的镇静(SED组,n = 77)。
两组之间的人口统计学特征和超声心动图参数相似(P>0.05)。有2例(2.6%)患者因手术原因从BIS引导下的镇静转为全身麻醉。SED组的手术时间明显短于GA组((127.10±44.43)分钟对(165.90±71.62)分钟,P = 0.004)。与GA组相比,SED组患者失血量更少,接受的红细胞和儿茶酚胺明显更少(5.19%对22.22%,P = 0.017;67.53%对97.22%,P<0.001)。SED组的住院时间明显更短,肺部并发症比GA组更少。两组的30天死亡率相似。
BIS引导下的镇静是经股动脉TAVI的一种可行且安全的方法。麻醉医生应根据团队经验选择最佳麻醉方法。