• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bispectral index-guided sedation in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective control study.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术中双谱指数引导镇静:一项回顾性对照研究。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017;18(4):353-359. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600522.
2
Sedation or general anesthesia for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation--does it affect outcome? An observational single-center study.行经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的镇静或全身麻醉——是否会影响结局?一项观察性单中心研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
3
[Initial Experience of a TAVI Program: Analysis of the Anesthetic Decision and its Evolution].[经导管主动脉瓣植入术项目的初步经验:麻醉决策分析及其演变]
Acta Med Port. 2019 Feb 28;32(2):126-132. doi: 10.20344/amp.10982.
4
General Anesthesia Versus Monitored Anesthesia Care for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Retrospective Study in a Single Belgian Referral Center.全身麻醉与监测麻醉护理在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用:单一家喻户晓的比利时转诊中心的回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Dec;33(12):3283-3291. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.06.027. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
5
Anesthesia and perioperative management of patients who undergo transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an observational study of general versus local/regional anesthesia in 125 consecutive patients.行经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的麻醉和围手术期管理:125 例连续患者全身麻醉与局部/区域麻醉的观察性研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1036-43. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
6
Outcome After General Anesthesia Versus Monitored Anesthesia Care in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术全身麻醉与监护麻醉的效果比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1238-43. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.034. Epub 2016 May 21.
7
Comparison of general anaesthesia and non-general anaesthesia approach in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经股动脉入路行主动脉瓣置换术的全身麻醉与非全身麻醉方式比较。
Heart. 2018 Oct;104(19):1621-1628. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312559. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Anesthetic experience of retrograde transfemoral approach with CoreValve ReValving System.经导管主动脉瓣植入术:使用CoreValve ReValving系统经股动脉逆行途径的麻醉经验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2014 Mar;52(1):2-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
9
Impact of Anesthesia Type on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Multicenter ADVANCE Study).麻醉类型对经导管主动脉瓣植入术结局的影响(来自多中心ADVANCE研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 15;117(8):1332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
10
Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation.经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术的局部麻醉与全身麻醉比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jan;101(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0362-8. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypercapnia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement under monitored anaesthesia care: a retrospective cohort study.经监测麻醉护理行经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的高碳酸血症:一项回顾性队列研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Aug 30;11(2):e002801. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002801.
2
Association of general anesthesia exposure with risk of postoperative delirium in patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and systematic review.全身麻醉暴露与行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者术后谵妄风险的关联:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43548-2.
3
Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness of Local or General Anesthesia after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后局部麻醉与全身麻醉的安全性和有效性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 7;12(2):508. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020508.

本文引用的文献

1
Sedation for transfemoral aortic valve transplantation (TAVI).
Anaesthesia. 2016 Nov;71(11):1376. doi: 10.1111/anae.13686.
2
Durability of prostheses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的假体耐久性。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Jun;13(6):360-7. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.43. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016 May;18(5):27. doi: 10.1007/s11883-016-0577-2.
4
Sedation or general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中的镇静或全身麻醉。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Sep;7(9):1518-26. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.08.21.
5
Comparison of sedation and general anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cerebral oxygen saturation and neurocognitive outcome†.经导管主动脉瓣植入术时镇静与全身麻醉对脑氧饱和度和神经认知结局的比较†。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jan;116(1):90-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev294. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
6
Sedation or general anesthesia for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation--does it affect outcome? An observational single-center study.行经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的镇静或全身麻醉——是否会影响结局?一项观察性单中心研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a severe stenotic bicuspid aortic valve in a Chinese population.中国人群中严重狭窄二叶式主动脉瓣患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术的安全性和有效性评估。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015 Mar;16(3):208-14. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1500017.
8
Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVR)的局部麻醉与全身麻醉——系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2014 Mar 10;12:41. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-41.
9
Efficacy of bispectral index monitoring during balanced propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.在结肠镜检查中使用双频谱指数监测平衡丙泊酚镇静的效果:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Dec;58(12):3576-83. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2833-4. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
10
Effect of local anesthetic management with conscious sedation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.局部麻醉联合清醒镇静管理对行经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 1;111(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.053. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术中双谱指数引导镇静:一项回顾性对照研究。

Bispectral index-guided sedation in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective control study.

作者信息

He Wei, Huang Rong-Rong, Shi Qing-Yu, Liu Xian-Bao, Wang Jian-An, Yan Min

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.

Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.

出版信息

J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017;18(4):353-359. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600522.

DOI:10.1631/jzus.B1600522
PMID:28378573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5394100/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive therapy for elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who were refused surgical aortic valve replacement because of the high perioperative risk. Traditionally, this procedure has been done under general anesthesia, but more recently local anesthesia and sedation have become popular. This research assessed the effectiveness of transfemoral TAVI under bispectral index (BIS)-guided sedation.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective control analysis, clinical data, including demographic characteristics, echocardiography, periprocedural data, and main complications, were collected and assessed in 113 patients undergoing TAVI through the femoral artery under general anesthesia (GA group, n=36) and under BIS-guided sedation (SED group, n=77).

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics and echocardiographic parameters between the two groups were similar (P>0.05). Two (2.6%) of patients were moved from BIS-guided sedation to general anesthesia for surgical reasons. Procedures were significantly shorter in the SED group than in the GA group ((127.10±44.43) min vs. (165.90±71.62) min, P=0.004). Patients in the SED group lost less blood and received significantly fewer red blood cells and catecholamines than those in the GA group (5.19% vs. 22.22%, P=0.017 and 67.53% vs. 97.22%, P<0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter and there were fewer pulmonary complications in the SED group than in the GA group. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BIS-guided sedation is a feasible and safe approach for transfemoral TAVI. The anesthesiologist should choose the best anesthetic method according to the team's experience.

摘要

目的

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是一种针对因围手术期风险高而拒绝接受外科主动脉瓣置换术的老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的微创治疗方法。传统上,该手术在全身麻醉下进行,但最近局部麻醉和镇静变得流行起来。本研究评估了在脑电双频指数(BIS)引导下镇静的经股动脉TAVI的有效性。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性对照分析中,收集并评估了113例经股动脉接受TAVI的患者的临床数据,包括人口统计学特征、超声心动图、围手术期数据和主要并发症,这些患者分别接受全身麻醉(GA组,n = 36)和BIS引导下的镇静(SED组,n = 77)。

结果

两组之间的人口统计学特征和超声心动图参数相似(P>0.05)。有2例(2.6%)患者因手术原因从BIS引导下的镇静转为全身麻醉。SED组的手术时间明显短于GA组((127.10±44.43)分钟对(165.90±71.62)分钟,P = 0.004)。与GA组相比,SED组患者失血量更少,接受的红细胞和儿茶酚胺明显更少(5.19%对22.22%,P = 0.017;67.53%对97.22%,P<0.001)。SED组的住院时间明显更短,肺部并发症比GA组更少。两组的30天死亡率相似。

结论

BIS引导下的镇静是经股动脉TAVI的一种可行且安全的方法。麻醉医生应根据团队经验选择最佳麻醉方法。