Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣植入术时镇静与全身麻醉对脑氧饱和度和神经认知结局的比较†。

Comparison of sedation and general anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cerebral oxygen saturation and neurocognitive outcome†.

机构信息

Institut für Anästhesiologie, Deutsches Herzzentrum München des Freistaates Bayern, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstr. 36, D-80636 Munich, Germany

Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jan;116(1):90-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev294. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Although general anaesthesia (TAVI-GA) and sedation (TAVI-S) have previously been described for TAVI, the difference in safety and efficacy of both methods has not been studied in a randomized trial.

METHODS

The INSERT trial was a single centre, controlled parallel-group trial with balanced randomization. Sixty-six patients (68-94 yr) with acquired aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral CoreValve™ were assigned to TAVI-GA or TAVI-S. Comparable operative risk was determined from risk-scores (EUROscore, STS-Score). Monitoring and anaesthetic drugs were standardized. Near-Infrared-Spectroscopy was used to monitor cerebral-oxymetry blinded. Primary outcome was the perioperative cumulative cerebral desaturation. As secondary outcomes, changes in neurocognitive function and respiratory and haemodynamic adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 66 included patients, 62 (TAVI-GA: n=31, TAVI-S: n=31) were finally analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable. In 24 patients (39%) cerebral desaturation was observed. Cumulative cerebral desaturation was comparable (TAVI-GA:(median [IQR]) (0[0/1308] s%) vs. TAVI-S:(0[0/276] s%); P=0.505) between the groups. Neurocognitive function did not change within and between groups. Adverse events were more frequently observed in TAVI-S patients (P<0.001). Bradypnoea (n=16, 52%) and the need for airway manoeuvres (n=11, 36%) or bag-mask-ventilation (n=6, 19%) were the most common respiratory adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebral desaturation occurred in both patient groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. Based on primary outcome, both methods were shown to be comparable. Neurocognitive outcome was similar. The higher incidence of adverse events in the sedation group suggests a potential advantage of general anaesthesia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT 01251328.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的一种治疗策略。虽然全身麻醉(TAVI-GA)和镇静(TAVI-S)以前曾用于 TAVI,但这两种方法的安全性和疗效差异尚未在随机试验中进行研究。

方法

INSERT 试验是一项单中心、对照平行组试验,采用平衡随机分组。66 名(68-94 岁)接受经股动脉 CoreValve™ 的获得性主动脉瓣狭窄患者被分配至 TAVI-GA 或 TAVI-S 组。从风险评分(EUROscore、STS-Score)确定了相似的手术风险。监测和麻醉药物均标准化。近红外光谱用于监测脑氧合,结果设盲。主要结局是围手术期累积脑缺氧。次要结局为神经认知功能变化以及呼吸和血液动力学不良事件。

结果

在纳入的 66 名患者中,最终分析了 62 名(TAVI-GA:n=31,TAVI-S:n=31)患者。基线特征具有可比性。在 24 名患者(39%)中观察到脑缺氧。两组之间累积脑缺氧无差异(TAVI-GA:(中位数[IQR])(0[0/1308] s%)vs. TAVI-S:(0[0/276] s%);P=0.505)。神经认知功能在组内和组间均无变化。镇静组患者更常发生不良事件(P<0.001)。呼吸不良事件(16 例,52%)和需要气道操作(11 例,36%)或球囊面罩通气(6 例,19%)最常见。

结论

两组患者均发生脑缺氧,但两组之间无显著差异。基于主要结局,两种方法均显示出可比性。神经认知结局相似。镇静组不良事件发生率较高提示全身麻醉可能具有优势。

临床试验注册

NCT 01251328。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验