a Division of General Internal Medicine , University Hospitals of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
b Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM) , Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
Med Teach. 2017 Apr;39(4):360-367. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1286309. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Clinical reasoning has been studied in residents or nurses, using interviews or patient-provider encounters. Despite a growing interest in interprofessional collaboration, the notion of collaborative reasoning has not been well studied in clinical settings. Our study aims at exploring resident-nurse collaborative reasoning in a simulation setting. We enrolled 14 resident-nurse teams from a general internal medicine division in a mixed methods study. Teams each managed one of four acute case scenarios, followed by a stimulated-recall session. A qualitative, inductive analysis of the transcripts identified five dimensions of collaborative reasoning: diagnostic reasoning, patient management, patient monitoring, communication with the patient, and team communication. Three investigators (two senior physicians, one nurse) assessed individual and team performances using a five-point Likert scale, and further extracted elements supporting the collaborative reasoning process. Global assessment of the resident-nurse team was not simply an average of individual performances. Qualitative results underlined the need to improve situational awareness, particularly for task overload. Team communication helped team members stay abreast of each other's thoughts and improve their efficiency. Residents and nurses differed in their reasoning processes, and awareness of this difference may contribute to improving interprofessional collaboration. Understanding collaborative reasoning can provide an additional dimension to interprofessional education.
临床推理已经在住院医师或护士中进行了研究,使用访谈或医患互动的方式。尽管人们对跨专业合作越来越感兴趣,但协作推理的概念在临床环境中还没有得到很好的研究。我们的研究旨在探索模拟环境中的住院医师-护士协作推理。我们从一个普通内科部门招募了 14 个住院医师-护士团队,进行了一项混合方法研究。每个团队管理四个急性病例情景之一,然后进行模拟回忆。对转录本的定性、归纳分析确定了协作推理的五个维度:诊断推理、患者管理、患者监测、与患者沟通和团队沟通。三位研究人员(两名高级医生,一名护士)使用五点李克特量表评估个人和团队的表现,并进一步提取支持协作推理过程的要素。住院医师-护士团队的整体评估不仅仅是个人表现的平均值。定性结果强调需要提高情境意识,特别是对于任务过载的情况。团队沟通有助于团队成员了解彼此的想法并提高效率。住院医师和护士的推理过程存在差异,了解这种差异可能有助于改善跨专业合作。理解协作推理可以为跨专业教育提供一个额外的维度。