Muller-Juge Virginie, Cullati Stéphane, Blondon Katherine S, Hudelson Patricia, Maître Fabienne, Vu Nu V, Savoldelli Georges L, Nendaz Mathieu R
Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Quality of Care Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Demographic and Life Course Studies, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 25;9(4):e96160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096160. eCollection 2014.
Effective teamwork is necessary for optimal patient care. There is insufficient understanding of interactions between physicians and nurses on internal medicine wards.
To describe resident physicians' and nurses' actual behaviours contributing to teamwork quality in the setting of a simulated internal medicine ward.
A volunteer sample of 14 pairs of residents and nurses in internal medicine was asked to manage one non-urgent and one urgent clinical case in a simulated ward, using a high-fidelity manikin. After the simulation, participants attended a stimulated-recall session during which they viewed the videotape of the simulation and explained their actions and perceptions. All simulations were transcribed, coded, and analyzed, using a qualitative method (template analysis). Quality of teamwork was assessed, based on patient management efficiency and presence of shared management goals and of team spirit.
Most resident-nurse pairs tended to interact in a traditional way, with residents taking the leadership and nurses executing medical prescriptions and assuming their own specific role. They also demonstrated different types of interactions involving shared responsibilities and decision making, constructive suggestions, active communication and listening, and manifestations of positive team building. The presence of a leader in the pair or a truly shared leadership between resident and nurse contributed to teamwork quality only if both members of the pair demonstrated sufficient autonomy. In case of a lack of autonomy of one member, the other member could compensate for it, if his/her own autonomy was sufficiently strong and if there were demonstrations of mutual listening, information sharing, and positive team building.
Although they often relied on traditional types of interaction, residents and nurses also demonstrated readiness for increased sharing of responsibilities. Interprofessional education should insist on better redefinition of respective roles and reinforce behaviours shown to enhance teamwork quality.
有效的团队合作对于提供最佳患者护理至关重要。目前对于内科病房中医师与护士之间的互动了解不足。
描述住院医师和护士在模拟内科病房环境中有助于团队合作质量的实际行为。
邀请14对内科住院医师和护士志愿者,使用高仿真人体模型在模拟病房中处理一个非紧急和一个紧急临床病例。模拟结束后,参与者参加一个刺激回忆环节,在此期间他们观看模拟录像并解释自己的行为和看法。所有模拟内容都进行了转录、编码和分析,采用定性方法(模板分析)。基于患者管理效率、共同管理目标的存在以及团队精神来评估团队合作质量。
大多数住院医师-护士对倾向于以传统方式互动,住院医师发挥领导作用,护士执行医疗处方并承担各自特定角色。他们还展示了不同类型的互动,包括共同承担责任和决策、建设性建议、积极沟通和倾听以及积极团队建设的表现。当一对中的一方有领导者或住院医师与护士之间存在真正的共同领导时,只有当这对中的双方都表现出足够的自主性时,才有助于团队合作质量。如果一方缺乏自主性,另一方如果自身自主性足够强,并且有相互倾听、信息共享和积极团队建设的表现,就可以弥补这一点。
尽管住院医师和护士经常依赖传统的互动方式,但他们也表现出愿意增加责任分担。跨专业教育应坚持更好地重新定义各自的角色,并强化那些显示能提高团队合作质量的行为。