Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Neuroscience Sector, Trieste, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 6;7:45967. doi: 10.1038/srep45967.
Mature moral judgments rely on the consideration of a perpetrator's mental state as well as harmfulness of the outcomes produced. Prior work has focused primarily on the functional correlates of how intent information is neurally represented for moral judgments, but few studies have investigated whether individual differences in neuroanatomy can also explain variation in moral judgments. In the current study, we conducted voxel-based morphometry analyses to address this question. We found that local grey matter volume in the left anterior superior temporal sulcus, a region in the functionally defined theory of mind or mentalizing network, was associated with the degree to which participants relied on information about innocent intentions to forgive accidental harms. Our findings provide further support for the key role of mentalizing in the forgiveness of accidental harms and contribute preliminary evidence for the neuroanatomical basis of individual differences in moral judgments.
成熟的道德判断不仅依赖于对行为人的心理状态的考虑,还依赖于所产生结果的危害性。先前的研究主要集中在意图信息如何在神经上被表示以用于道德判断的功能相关性上,但很少有研究调查神经解剖学的个体差异是否也可以解释道德判断的变化。在本研究中,我们进行了基于体素的形态测量分析来解决这个问题。我们发现,左侧前上颞叶回(功能定义的心理理论或心理化网络中的一个区域)的局部灰质体积与参与者依赖于关于无辜意图的信息来原谅意外伤害的程度有关。我们的研究结果为心理化在原谅意外伤害中的关键作用提供了进一步的支持,并为道德判断个体差异的神经解剖学基础提供了初步证据。