Jarlenski Marian, Hutcheon Jennifer A, Bodnar Lisa M, Simhan Hyagriv N
Departments of Health Policy and Management and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):786-794. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001982.
To estimate the association between state Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion and severe maternal morbidity and in-hospital maternal mortality in the United States.
We used data on pregnancy-related hospitalizations from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2011 (weighted n=38,016,845). State-level Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion for each year was determined from Guttmacher Institute reports. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between state Medicaid coverage of abortion and severe maternal morbidity and in-hospital maternal mortality, overall and stratified by payer.
The unadjusted rate of severe maternal morbidity was lower among Medicaid-paid hospitalizations in states with Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion relative to those in states without such coverage (62.4 compared with 69.3 per 10,000). Among Medicaid-paid hospitalizations in states with Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion, there were 8.5 per 10,000 fewer cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-16.5) of severe maternal morbidity in adjusted analyses relative to those in states without such Medicaid coverage. Similarly, there were 10.3 per 10,000 fewer cases (95% CI 3.5-17.2) of severe maternal morbidity in adjusted analyses among private insurance-paid hospitalizations in states with Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion relative to those in states without such Medicaid coverage. The adjusted rate of in-hospital maternal mortality was not different for Medicaid-paid hospitalizations in states with and without Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion (9.2 and 9.0 per 100,000, respectively) nor for private insurance-paid hospitalizations (5.6 and 6.1 per 100,000, respectively).
State Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion was associated with an average 16% decreased risk of severe maternal morbidity. An association between state Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion and a reduced risk of severe maternal morbidity was observed in women covered by both Medicaid and private insurance. Results suggest that Medicaid coverage of medically necessary abortion is not harmful to maternal health.
评估美国医疗必需堕胎的州医疗补助覆盖范围与严重孕产妇发病率及住院孕产妇死亡率之间的关联。
我们使用了2000年至2011年全国住院患者样本中与妊娠相关的住院数据(加权n = 38,016,845)。每年各州医疗必需堕胎的医疗补助覆盖范围由古特马赫研究所的报告确定。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来检验各州堕胎医疗补助覆盖范围与严重孕产妇发病率及住院孕产妇死亡率之间的关联,总体分析以及按付款人分层分析。
在有医疗必需堕胎医疗补助覆盖的州,医疗补助支付的住院病例中,严重孕产妇发病率的未调整率低于没有此类覆盖的州(每10,000例中分别为62.4例和69.3例)。在有医疗必需堕胎医疗补助覆盖的州,经调整分析,医疗补助支付的住院病例中,严重孕产妇发病率每10,000例比没有此类医疗补助覆盖的州少8.5例(95%置信区间[CI] 4.0 - 16.5)。同样,在有医疗必需堕胎医疗补助覆盖的州,经调整分析,私人保险支付的住院病例中,严重孕产妇发病率每10,000例比没有此类医疗补助覆盖的州少10.3例(95% CI 3.5 - 17.2)。有和没有医疗必需堕胎医疗补助覆盖的州,医疗补助支付的住院病例的调整后住院孕产妇死亡率没有差异(分别为每100,000例中9.2例和9.0例),私人保险支付的住院病例也没有差异(分别为每100,000例中5.6例和6.1例)。
州医疗补助对医疗必需堕胎的覆盖与严重孕产妇发病率风险平均降低16%相关。在医疗补助和私人保险覆盖的女性中,均观察到州医疗补助对医疗必需堕胎的覆盖与严重孕产妇发病率风险降低之间存在关联。结果表明,医疗补助对医疗必需堕胎的覆盖对孕产妇健康无害。