Suppr超能文献

S-1 对比卡培他滨用于转移性结直肠癌一线治疗的随机 III 期临床试验:荷兰结直肠癌研究组 SALTO 研究。

Randomized phase III trial of S-1 versus capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: SALTO study by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

Department of Medical Oncology, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1288-1293. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx122.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common side-effect of capecitabine. S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine with comparable efficacy to capecitabine in gastrointestinal cancers but associated with a lower incidence of HFS in Asian patients. This study compares the incidence of HFS between S-1 and capecitabine as first-line treatment in Western metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated mCRC and planned treatment with fluoropyrimidine monochemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 orally for patients <70 years; 1000 mg/m2 for patients ≥70 years, twice daily on days 1-14) or S-1 (30 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14) in 3-weekly cycles, with bevacizumab optional in both groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of any grade HFS, as assessed by both physicians and patients (diaries). Secondary endpoints included grade 3 HFS, other toxicities, relative dose intensity, progression-free survival, response rate and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients were randomized in 27 centres. The incidence of any grade HFS as assessed by physicians was 73% in the capecitabine group (n = 80) and 45% in the S-1 group (n = 80) [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.31 (0.16-0.60), P = 0.0005]. The incidence of grade 3 HFS was 21% and 4% (P = 0.003), respectively. Patient-assessed any grade HFS was 84% and 58%, respectively (P = 0.004). Grade 3 anorexia was more common in the S-1 group (3% versus 13%, P = 0.03). Median relative dose intensity was 88% in the capecitabine group and 95% in the S-1 group (P = 0.026). There were no statistically significant differences in median progression-free survival, response rate and overall survival rates.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with S-1 in Western mCRC patients is associated with a significantly lower incidence of HFS compared with capecitabine, with comparable efficacy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01918852.

摘要

背景

手足综合征(HFS)是卡培他滨的常见副作用。S-1 是一种口服氟嘧啶,在胃肠道癌症中的疗效与卡培他滨相当,但在亚洲患者中 HFS 的发生率较低。本研究比较了 S-1 与卡培他滨作为一线治疗在西方转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中的 HFS 发生率。

患者和方法

既往未接受治疗的 mCRC 患者,计划接受氟嘧啶单药化疗,随机分为 1:1 接受卡培他滨(<70 岁患者 1250mg/m2 口服;≥70 岁患者 1000mg/m2 口服,每日 2 次,第 1-14 天)或 S-1(30mg/m2 口服,每日 2 次,第 1-14 天)治疗,两组均可选贝伐珠单抗。主要终点是由医生和患者(日记)评估的任何级别 HFS 的发生率。次要终点包括 3 级 HFS、其他毒性、相对剂量强度、无进展生存期、缓解率和总生存期。

结果

共 161 例患者在 27 个中心随机分组。医生评估的任何级别 HFS 的发生率在卡培他滨组为 73%(n=80),S-1 组为 45%(n=80)[比值比(95%置信区间)0.31(0.16-0.60),P=0.0005]。3 级 HFS 的发生率分别为 21%和 4%(P=0.003)。患者评估的任何级别 HFS 分别为 84%和 58%(P=0.004)。S-1 组更常见 3 级厌食(3%比 13%,P=0.03)。卡培他滨组的中位相对剂量强度为 88%,S-1 组为 95%(P=0.026)。中位无进展生存期、缓解率和总生存率无统计学差异。

结论

与卡培他滨相比,S-1 治疗西方 mCRC 患者的 HFS 发生率显著降低,疗效相当。

临床试验注册

NCT01918852。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验