• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错失的机会:产前护理中的未识别遗传风险因素。

Missed opportunities: unidentified genetic risk factors in prenatal care.

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine, School of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2018 Jan;38(1):75-79. doi: 10.1002/pd.5048. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1002/pd.5048
PMID:28384392
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal and preconception care guidelines recommend obtaining family history to screen for reproductive genetic risk. The effectiveness of this screening and subsequent referral for genetic counseling is not well established. This study describes how often pregnant women with reproductive genetic risks were not referred for prenatal genetic counseling and the indications frequently missed.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed genetic consultation medical records for first-trimester screen pretest counseling. These women had no documented indications for genetic counseling. We used the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics referral guidelines for genetic counseling to identify missed indications within the parents' personal and family histories. Patients with advanced maternal age were excluded.

RESULTS

We reviewed 416 consultation notes. The counselor elicited a genetic risk for which a referral had not been made in 27% of the pregnant women. Of these, 70% were genetic risks in the family history, 23% in the couple's history, and 7% in the prenatal history. The most common missed indications were personal or family history of birth defects (38%), intellectual disability or autism (19%), and a prior positive genetic carrier screening test (14%).

CONCLUSION

Genetic risk factors are not consistently identified as a referral indication for reproductive genetic counseling. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

目的

产前和孕前保健指南建议获取家族史以筛查生殖遗传风险。这种筛查的有效性及其随后的遗传咨询转介尚未得到充分证实。本研究描述了有生殖遗传风险的孕妇未被转介进行产前遗传咨询的频率以及经常遗漏的指征。

方法

我们回顾性地审查了早孕筛查预测试验咨询的遗传咨询病历。这些女性没有遗传咨询的书面指征。我们使用美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院的遗传咨询转介指南,在父母的个人和家族史中确定遗漏的指征。排除了高龄产妇。

结果

我们审查了 416 份咨询记录。顾问在 27%的孕妇中发现了遗传风险,但没有进行转介。其中,70%为家族史中的遗传风险,23%为夫妻史中的遗传风险,7%为产前史中的遗传风险。最常见的遗漏指征是个人或家族史中有出生缺陷(38%)、智力障碍或自闭症(19%)和先前的阳性遗传携带者筛查试验(14%)。

结论

遗传风险因素并未被一致确定为生殖遗传咨询的转介指征。© 2017 约翰威立父子公司。

相似文献

1
Missed opportunities: unidentified genetic risk factors in prenatal care.错失的机会:产前护理中的未识别遗传风险因素。
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Jan;38(1):75-79. doi: 10.1002/pd.5048. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
3
Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.加拿大妇产科医师学会(SOGC)和加拿大医学遗传学会(CCMG)关于生殖遗传携带者筛查的联合意见:面向直接面向消费者检测时代所有加拿大孕产妇和生殖健康护理提供者的最新信息。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Aug;38(8):742-762.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.06.008.
4
The uptake of pan-ethnic expanded carrier screening is higher when offered during preconception or early prenatal genetic counseling.泛种族扩展携带者筛查的吸收率在孕前或早期产前遗传咨询时更高。
Prenat Diagn. 2019 Mar;39(4):319-323. doi: 10.1002/pd.5434. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Adherence Patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Referral of Women With Breast Cancer to Genetics Professionals.乳腺癌女性转诊至遗传学专业人员的国家综合癌症网络指南的遵循模式。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;39(4):363-7. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000073.
6
The impact of first-trimester screening on AMA patients' uptake of invasive testing.孕早期筛查对高龄产妇接受侵入性检查的影响。
Prenat Diagn. 2005 May;25(5):350-3. doi: 10.1002/pd.1144.
7
Accuracy of Routine Prenatal Genetic Screening in Patients Referred for Genetic Counseling.常规产前遗传筛查在遗传咨询患者中的准确性。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Feb;37(3):271-276. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678533. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Counseling for personal health implications identified during reproductive genetic carrier screening.针对生殖遗传携带者筛查中发现的个人健康影响进行咨询。
Prenat Diagn. 2021 Oct;41(11):1460-1466. doi: 10.1002/pd.6033. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
9
Use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis during the preconception, antepartum and postpartum periods at two United States medical centers.美国两家医疗中心在孕前、产前和产后期间使用艾滋病毒暴露前预防药物的情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):632.e1-632.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Prenatal genetic counseling referrals for advanced maternal age: still room for improvement.高龄孕产妇的产前遗传咨询转诊:仍有改进空间。
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jan;34(1):71-4. doi: 10.1002/pd.4257.

引用本文的文献

1
The design, implementation, and effectiveness of intervention strategies aimed at improving genetic referral practices: a systematic review of the literature.旨在改善遗传转介实践的干预策略的设计、实施和效果:文献系统评价。
Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2239-2249. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01272-0. Epub 2021 Aug 24.