Nobaek S, Rogmark P, Petersson U
1 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Scand J Surg. 2017 Dec;106(4):285-293. doi: 10.1177/1457496917690966. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Treatment of synthetic mesh infections has previously often resulted in mesh explantation. Negative pressure wound therapy has been used in these situations with encouraging results. The aims of this study were to evaluate wound healing, mesh preservation, and patient-reported outcome after negative pressure wound therapy of mesh infections.
Medical records of patients treated with negative pressure wound therapy for mesh infection and age-matched mesh-operated controls without postoperative complications were scrutinized in a retrospective study. An abdominal wall complaints questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-reported outcome.
Of 722 mesh operations performed 2005-2012, negative pressure wound therapy was used for treating postoperative mesh infections in 48 patients. A total of 48 age-matched controls were recruited from patients without wound complications. No differences were found between groups regarding preoperative characteristics. The following peroperative characteristics were significantly more frequent in the negative pressure wound therapy group: emergency operation, dirty/infected surgical field, surgical techniques other than laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair, implantation of more than one mesh, larger mesh size, longer duration of surgery, and mesh not completely covered with anterior rectus fascia. The entire mesh was salvaged in 92%, while four meshes were partly excised. Wounds healed in 88% after a median of 110 (range 3-649) days. In total, 85% in the negative pressure wound therapy group and 75% in the control group answered the questionnaire. There were no significant differences regarding pain, other abdominal wall symptoms, and satisfaction with the final result in favor of the controls.
No mesh had to be explanted and wound healing was achieved in the majority of patients when negative pressure wound therapy was used for treatment of mesh infections. However, time to healing was long, and numerous procedures were sometimes needed. Positive long-term outcome was more frequently reported among controls.
以往合成补片感染的治疗常常导致补片取出。负压伤口治疗已用于这些情况,结果令人鼓舞。本研究的目的是评估负压伤口治疗补片感染后的伤口愈合、补片保留情况以及患者报告的结局。
在一项回顾性研究中,仔细审查了接受负压伤口治疗补片感染患者的病历以及年龄匹配的无术后并发症的补片手术对照患者的病历。使用腹壁症状调查问卷评估患者报告的结局。
在2005年至2012年进行的722例补片手术中,48例患者使用负压伤口治疗术后补片感染。从无伤口并发症的患者中招募了48例年龄匹配的对照。两组术前特征无差异。以下手术特征在负压伤口治疗组中明显更常见:急诊手术、手术野脏污/感染、非腹腔镜腹腔内植入补片修复的手术技术、植入多个补片、补片尺寸较大、手术时间较长以及补片未完全被腹直肌前鞘覆盖。92%的补片得以保留,4块补片部分切除。伤口在中位时间110天(范围3 - 649天)后88%愈合。负压伤口治疗组85%、对照组75%的患者回答了问卷。在疼痛、其他腹壁症状以及对最终结果的满意度方面,对照组无显著差异。
使用负压伤口治疗补片感染时,大多数患者无需取出补片且伤口愈合。然而,愈合时间长,有时需要进行多次手术。对照组更常报告长期结局良好。