• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The negative pressure wound therapy may salvage the infected mesh following open incisional hernia repair.负压伤口治疗可能挽救开放性切口疝修补术后感染的补片。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec 23;61:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.013. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
The salvage of mesh infection after hernia repair with the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), a systematic review.疝修补术后使用负压伤口治疗(NPWT)治疗网片感染的挽救:系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2448-2456. doi: 10.1111/ans.18040. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Is Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair an Available Option for Incisional Hernia Repair? A Retrospective Cohort Study.补片聚丙烯网片修补术是切口疝修补的可行选择吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Am Surg. 2019 Feb 1;85(2):183-187.
4
Early Outcome after Sublay versus Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair for Ventral Midline Incisional Hernia - A Single Center Retrospective Analysis.经腹腔腹膜前修补术与网片上修补术治疗腹正中线切口疝的早期疗效 - 单中心回顾性分析。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2023 Dec;118(6):673-679. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.673.
5
Use of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of infected abdominal wounds containing mesh: an analysis of outcomes.使用负压伤口治疗技术管理含网片的感染性腹部伤口:结果分析。
Int Wound J. 2011 Apr;8(2):118-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00756.x. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
6
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.切口疝的开放手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.
7
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究(PRIMA)
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Combined approach with negative pressure wound therapy and biological mesh for treatment of enterocutaneous fistula after synthetic mesh repair of incisional hernia. A case report.负压伤口治疗联合生物补片在合成补片修补切口疝术后肠皮肤瘘中的应用。病例报告。
Ann Ital Chir. 2021 Apr 12;10:S2239253X21035039.
10
Robotic-assisted repair of incisional hernia-early experiences of a university robotic hernia program and comparison with open and minimally invasive sublay technique (eMILOS).机器人辅助切口疝修补术-大学机器人疝项目的早期经验及与开放和微创经腹腔入路腹膜前修补术(eMILOS)的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 12;408(1):396. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03129-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study Describing Postoperative Wound Care Practice in Northeast Ethiopia.描述埃塞俄比亚东北部术后伤口护理实践的多中心横断面研究。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Dec 20;9:23779608231219134. doi: 10.1177/23779608231219134. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
A Ventral Hernia-repair-related Mesh Infection Treated with NPWT without Mesh Removal.经负压伤口治疗(NPWT)处理且未移除补片的腹疝修补相关补片感染
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Sep 7;9(9):e3799. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003799. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Letter to editor concerning article titled "The negative pressure wound therapy may salvage the infected mesh following open incisional hernia repair".致编辑的信:关于题为《负压伤口治疗可能挽救开放性切口疝修补术后感染的补片》的文章
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar 6;64:102191. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102191. eCollection 2021 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors affecting salvage rate of infected prosthetic mesh.影响感染性假体网片再利用率的因素。
Am J Surg. 2020 Sep;220(3):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery.STROCSS 2019 指南:加强外科学队列研究报告。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Prevention and Treatment Strategies for Mesh Infection in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.腹壁重建中补片感染的预防和治疗策略。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep;142(3 Suppl):149S-155S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004871.
4
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Treatment of Mesh Infection After Abdominal Surgery: Long-Term Results and Patient-Reported Outcome.负压伤口疗法治疗腹部手术后网片感染:长期结果及患者报告结局
Scand J Surg. 2017 Dec;106(4):285-293. doi: 10.1177/1457496917690966. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
5
Partial versus complete removal of the infected mesh after abdominal wall hernia repair.腹壁疝修补术后感染补片的部分切除与完整切除
Am J Surg. 2017 Jul;214(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
VAC-instillation therapy in abdominal mesh exposure: a novel indication.腹腔补片暴露的负压封闭引流灌洗治疗:一种新的适应证
J Surg Res. 2016 Dec;206(2):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
7
A retrospective analysis of surgical treatment of mesh infection after repair of ventral hernia or defect.腹疝修补或缺损修复术后补片感染手术治疗的回顾性分析
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Nov 19;14(4):14387-95. doi: 10.4238/2015.November.18.2.
8
Mesh Location in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.开放式腹疝修补术中补片的位置:系统评价与网状Meta分析
World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9.
9
Multiple bowel perforation and necrotising fasciitis secondary to abdominal liposuction in a patient with bilateral lumbar hernia.一名患有双侧腰椎疝的患者在腹部抽脂术后出现多处肠穿孔和坏死性筋膜炎。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2014 Sep-Dec;47(3):436-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.146650.
10
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part 2.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝的指南(国际内镜疝学会[IEHS])——第2部分。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):353-79. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3171-5.

负压伤口治疗可能挽救开放性切口疝修补术后感染的补片。

The negative pressure wound therapy may salvage the infected mesh following open incisional hernia repair.

作者信息

Boettge K, Azarhoush S, Fiebelkorn J, De Santo G, Aljedani N, Ortiz P, Anders S, Hünerbein M, Paasch C

机构信息

Franciscan Health General Surgery, Olympia Fields, IL, USA.

Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec 23;61:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.013. eCollection 2021 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.013
PMID:33408855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7773670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

s: Incisional hernias may occur in 10-25% of patients undergoing laparotomy. In cases of a surgical site infection (SSI) after incisional hernia repair (IHR) secondary operative intervention with mesh removal are often needed. There is only minimal data available in the literature regarding the treatment of a wound infection with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Conducting the study at hand, we aimed to provide more evidence on this topic.

METHODS

From April to June 2020 a monocentric retrospective study has been performed. Patients who underwent NPWT due to a SSI with mesh involvement following open IHR from 2007 to 2020 were included. The primary endpoint was the mesh removal rate in the end of NPWT. Main secondary endpoints were the duration of NPWT and the amount of NPWT procedures.

RESULTS

The data of 30 patients were extracted. The average age was 65.9 years (9.9). A total of 13 individuals were male and 17 females. The BMI was on average 31.1 kg/m (4.9). All patients received a polypropylene mesh. The average duration of NPWT was 31.3 days (22.1). The first wound revision with initiation of a NPWT was conducted on average 31.1 days (34.0) after IHR. The average amount of NPWT procedures was 8.3 (7.2). In 5 of 30 patients (16.6%) the mesh was removed (Open sublay group n = 4 (36.34%) vs. open onlay group n = 1 (5.26%), p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

In cases of SSI following IHR the NPWT may facilitate mesh selvage. Further trials with a larger sample size are mandatory to confirm our hypothesis.

摘要

背景

剖腹手术患者中,10%-25%可能发生切口疝。切口疝修补术(IHR)后若发生手术部位感染(SSI),往往需要二次手术取出补片。关于负压伤口治疗(NPWT)用于治疗伤口感染的文献资料极少。开展本研究旨在提供更多关于该主题的证据。

方法

2020年4月至6月进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。纳入2007年至2020年因开放IHR术后SSI且补片受累而接受NPWT治疗的患者。主要终点是NPWT结束时的补片取出率。主要次要终点是NPWT的持续时间和NPWT治疗次数。

结果

提取了30例患者的数据。平均年龄为65.9岁(9.9岁)。男性13例,女性17例。平均体重指数为31.1kg/m²(4.9)。所有患者均接受聚丙烯补片。NPWT的平均持续时间为31.3天(22.1天)。首次伤口清创并开始NPWT平均在IHR术后31.1天(34.0天)进行。NPWT治疗的平均次数为8.3次(7.2次)。30例患者中有5例(16.6%)取出了补片(开放下层组n = 4例(36.34%),开放上层组n = 1例(5.26%),p = 0.047)。

结论

IHR术后发生SSI时,NPWT可能有助于补片保留。需要进一步开展更大样本量的试验来证实我们的假设。