Hosaka Tetsuro, Sugimoto Koun, Numata Shinya
Department of Tourism Science, Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 7;12(4):e0175243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175243. eCollection 2017.
Urban biodiversity conservation often aims to promote the quality of life for urban residents by providing ecosystem services as well as habitats for diverse wildlife. However, biodiversity inevitably brings some disadvantages, including problems and nuisances caused by wildlife. Although some studies have reported that enhancement of nature interaction among urban children promotes their affective attitude toward of favorable animals, its effect on tolerance toward problem-causing wildlife is unknown. In this study, we assessed the tolerance of 1,030 urban residents in Japan toward hornets and wild boar, and analyzed the effects of childhood experience with nature on tolerance using a structural equation model. The model used sociodemographic factors and childhood nature experience as explanatory variables, affective attitude toward these animals as a mediator, and tolerance as a response variable. The public tolerance toward hornets and boars was low; over 60% of the respondents would request the removal of hornets and wild boar from nearby green spaces by government services, even when the animals had not caused any damage. Tolerance was lower in females and elderly respondents. Childhood experience with nature had a greater influence on tolerance than did sociodemographic factors in the scenario where animals have not caused any problems; however, its effect was only indirect via promoting positive affective attitude toward wildlife when the animals have caused problems. Our results suggest that increasing people's direct experience with nature is important to raise public tolerance, but its effect is limited to cases where wildlife does not cause any problems. To obtain wider support for conservation in urban areas, conservationists, working together with municipal officials, educators and the media, should provide relevant information on the ecological functions performed by problem-causing wildlife and strategies for avoiding the problems that wildlife can cause.
城市生物多样性保护通常旨在通过提供生态系统服务以及为多样的野生动物提供栖息地来提升城市居民的生活质量。然而,生物多样性不可避免地带来一些不利之处,包括野生动物引发的问题和麻烦。尽管一些研究报告称,增强城市儿童与自然的互动能促进他们对有益动物的积极态度,但其对容忍造成问题的野生动物的影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们评估了日本1030名城市居民对黄蜂和野猪的容忍度,并使用结构方程模型分析了童年自然体验对容忍度的影响。该模型将社会人口统计学因素和童年自然体验作为解释变量,对这些动物的情感态度作为中介变量,容忍度作为响应变量。公众对黄蜂和野猪的容忍度较低;超过60%的受访者会要求政府部门将附近绿地中的黄蜂和野猪清除,即使这些动物并未造成任何损害。女性和老年受访者的容忍度更低。在动物未造成任何问题的情况下,童年自然体验对容忍度的影响比社会人口统计学因素更大;然而,当动物造成问题时,其影响仅通过促进对野生动物的积极情感态度而间接产生。我们的研究结果表明,增加人们与自然的直接体验对于提高公众容忍度很重要,但其效果仅限于野生动物未造成任何问题的情况。为了在城市地区获得对保护工作更广泛的支持,保护主义者应与市政官员、教育工作者和媒体合作,提供有关造成问题的野生动物所执行的生态功能以及避免野生动物可能造成问题的策略的相关信息。