• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

560例接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的长期预后及早期与新一代瓣膜的倾向评分匹配分析

Long-Term Outcomes of 560 Consecutive Patients Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early- Versus New-Generation Valves.

作者信息

Levi Amos, Landes Uri, Assali Abid R, Orvin Katia, Sharony Ram, Vaknin-Assa Hanna, Hamdan Ashraf, Shapira Yaron, Schwartzenberg Shmuel, Codner Pablo, Shaul Aviv A, Vaturi Mordechai, Gutstein Ariel, Sagie Alexander, Kornowski Ran

机构信息

Cardiology Department, "Rabin Medical Center," Petah Tikva, Israel; "Sackler" School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

"Sackler" School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, "Rabin Medical Center," Petah Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.041. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.041
PMID:28388992
Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis in patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk. Nevertheless, long-term clinical and echocardiographic data are still lacking. We carried out an analysis of 560 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at our institution from 2008 to 2016 to evaluate temporal changes in TAVI characteristics, predictors of 1-year and long-term outcomes, and to compare the performance of the early- and new-generation valve systems. With time, we have adopted lower risk threshold for patient selection and have been using conscious sedation and transfemoral access preferentially (p <0.001 for all). The incidence of greater than mild PVL decreased from 16% to 7.6%, p = 0.029. Within 5 years, 47% of the patients died, the majority (78%) due to noncardiac causes. Independent predictors of 1-year death included periprocedural aspects (i.e., vascular complications, stroke, and PVL), whereas death occurring later than 1 year was solely related to baseline co-morbidities. Transvalvular gradients and residual regurgitation remained nonclinically significant for up to 5 years of follow-up. New-generation valves were associated with less PVL compared with propensity score-matched early-generation valves (p <0.001). In conclusion, TAVI utilization at our institution has progressed to include lower risk patients with transfemoral access becoming applicable in the great majority. Poor long-term survival is attributable to population factors rather than to procedural factors. Intermediate- and long-term hemodynamics are excellent. PVL has diminished significantly with the new-generation valves. Efforts to improve long- and short-term outcomes remain a therapeutic challenge.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是治疗手术风险高或手术禁忌的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的既定疗法。然而,长期的临床和超声心动图数据仍然缺乏。我们对2008年至2016年在我院连续接受TAVI治疗的560例患者进行了分析,以评估TAVI特征的时间变化、1年和长期预后的预测因素,并比较早期和新一代瓣膜系统的性能。随着时间的推移,我们对患者选择采用了更低的风险阈值,并优先使用清醒镇静和经股动脉入路(所有p<0.001)。中重度瓣周漏(PVL)的发生率从16%降至7.6%,p = 0.029。5年内,47%的患者死亡,大多数(78%)死于非心脏原因。1年死亡的独立预测因素包括围手术期因素(即血管并发症、中风和PVL),而1年后发生的死亡仅与基线合并症有关。在长达5年的随访中,跨瓣压差和残余反流在临床上仍无显著意义。与倾向评分匹配的早期瓣膜相比,新一代瓣膜的PVL较少(p<0.001)。总之,我院TAVI的应用已取得进展,纳入了风险较低的患者,绝大多数患者可采用经股动脉入路。长期生存率低归因于人群因素而非手术因素。中长期血流动力学良好。新一代瓣膜使PVL显著减少。改善长期和短期预后的努力仍然是一个治疗挑战。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes of 560 Consecutive Patients Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early- Versus New-Generation Valves.560例接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的长期预后及早期与新一代瓣膜的倾向评分匹配分析
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.041. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Comparative Matched Outcome of Evolut-R vs CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Evolut-R与CoreValve经导管主动脉瓣植入术的比较匹配结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Feb;29(2):69-74.
3
Safety and efficacy of the percutaneous transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation using various transcatheter heart valves in 100 consecutive patients.100例连续患者使用各种经导管心脏瓣膜经皮经腋动脉途径进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的安全性和有效性。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;232:247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
4
Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the newest-generation Sapien 3 vs. Direct Flow Medical valve in a single center cohort.单中心队列中经导管主动脉瓣植入术采用最新一代Sapien 3瓣膜与Direct Flow Medical瓣膜的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;232:186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.032. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
5
Comparison of balloon-expandable vs. self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from the CENTER-collaboration.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中球囊扩张瓣与自膨式瓣的比较:来自 CENTER 合作研究。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Feb 1;40(5):456-465. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy805.
6
Improving outcomes: case-matched comparison of novel second-generation versus first-generation self-expandable transcatheter heart valves.改善治疗效果:新型第二代与第一代自膨胀经导管心脏瓣膜的病例匹配比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug;50(2):368-73. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw021. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
Sutureless aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of comparative matched studies using propensity score matching.无缝合主动脉瓣置换术与经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项使用倾向评分匹配的比较配对研究的荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Feb 1;26(2):202-209. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx294.
8
Propensity score matched comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus conventional surgery in intermediate and low risk aortic stenosis patients: A hint of real-world.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与传统手术治疗中低危主动脉瓣狭窄患者的倾向性评分匹配比较:真实世界的提示。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(5):541-551. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0051. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
Trends over the past 4 years in population characteristics, 30-day outcomes and 1-year survival in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.过去4年中接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗的患者的人口统计学特征、30天预后及1年生存率趋势。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Aug-Sep;109(8-9):457-64. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
10
Comparison of Valve Durability and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Less-Than-High-Risk for Surgery.严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险较低的患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的瓣膜耐久性和结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;125(8):1202-1208. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association between Blood Pressure and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的血压与临床结局之间的关联
Pulse (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;12(1):85-94. doi: 10.1159/000540209. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Impact of multiple comorbidities on long-term mortality in older patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.多种合并症对老年患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后长期死亡率的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36724. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36724. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
3
Long-Term Outcome with New Generation Prostheses in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者使用新一代假体的长期预后
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 14;10(14):3102. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143102.
4
A comparative profitability analysis of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in a high-volume French hospital.法国一家大型医院经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的盈利能力比较分析
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0223-0.