Levi Amos, Landes Uri, Assali Abid R, Orvin Katia, Sharony Ram, Vaknin-Assa Hanna, Hamdan Ashraf, Shapira Yaron, Schwartzenberg Shmuel, Codner Pablo, Shaul Aviv A, Vaturi Mordechai, Gutstein Ariel, Sagie Alexander, Kornowski Ran
Cardiology Department, "Rabin Medical Center," Petah Tikva, Israel; "Sackler" School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
"Sackler" School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, "Rabin Medical Center," Petah Tikva, Israel.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.041. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis in patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk. Nevertheless, long-term clinical and echocardiographic data are still lacking. We carried out an analysis of 560 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at our institution from 2008 to 2016 to evaluate temporal changes in TAVI characteristics, predictors of 1-year and long-term outcomes, and to compare the performance of the early- and new-generation valve systems. With time, we have adopted lower risk threshold for patient selection and have been using conscious sedation and transfemoral access preferentially (p <0.001 for all). The incidence of greater than mild PVL decreased from 16% to 7.6%, p = 0.029. Within 5 years, 47% of the patients died, the majority (78%) due to noncardiac causes. Independent predictors of 1-year death included periprocedural aspects (i.e., vascular complications, stroke, and PVL), whereas death occurring later than 1 year was solely related to baseline co-morbidities. Transvalvular gradients and residual regurgitation remained nonclinically significant for up to 5 years of follow-up. New-generation valves were associated with less PVL compared with propensity score-matched early-generation valves (p <0.001). In conclusion, TAVI utilization at our institution has progressed to include lower risk patients with transfemoral access becoming applicable in the great majority. Poor long-term survival is attributable to population factors rather than to procedural factors. Intermediate- and long-term hemodynamics are excellent. PVL has diminished significantly with the new-generation valves. Efforts to improve long- and short-term outcomes remain a therapeutic challenge.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是治疗手术风险高或手术禁忌的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的既定疗法。然而,长期的临床和超声心动图数据仍然缺乏。我们对2008年至2016年在我院连续接受TAVI治疗的560例患者进行了分析,以评估TAVI特征的时间变化、1年和长期预后的预测因素,并比较早期和新一代瓣膜系统的性能。随着时间的推移,我们对患者选择采用了更低的风险阈值,并优先使用清醒镇静和经股动脉入路(所有p<0.001)。中重度瓣周漏(PVL)的发生率从16%降至7.6%,p = 0.029。5年内,47%的患者死亡,大多数(78%)死于非心脏原因。1年死亡的独立预测因素包括围手术期因素(即血管并发症、中风和PVL),而1年后发生的死亡仅与基线合并症有关。在长达5年的随访中,跨瓣压差和残余反流在临床上仍无显著意义。与倾向评分匹配的早期瓣膜相比,新一代瓣膜的PVL较少(p<0.001)。总之,我院TAVI的应用已取得进展,纳入了风险较低的患者,绝大多数患者可采用经股动脉入路。长期生存率低归因于人群因素而非手术因素。中长期血流动力学良好。新一代瓣膜使PVL显著减少。改善长期和短期预后的努力仍然是一个治疗挑战。