Suppr超能文献

动态计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像:检测血管特异性缺血的临床分析方法比较

Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Comparison of Clinical Analysis Methods for the Detection of Vessel-Specific Ischemia.

作者信息

Rossi Alexia, Wragg Andrew, Klotz Ernst, Pirro Federica, Moon James C, Nieman Koen, Pugliese Francesca

机构信息

From the Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom and Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.R., A.W., F. Pirro, F. Pugliese); Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany (E.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (J.C.M.); and Departments of Cardiology and Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands (K.N.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005505.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical analysis of myocardial dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging lacks standardization. The objective of this prospective study was to compare different analysis approaches to diagnose ischemia in patients with stable angina referred for invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients referred for evaluation of stable angina symptoms underwent adenosine-stress dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with a second-generation dual-source scanner. Quantitative perfusion parameters, such as blood flow, were calculated by parametric deconvolution for each myocardial voxel. Initially, perfusion parameters were extracted according to standard 17-segment model of the left ventricle (fully automatic analysis). These were then manually sampled by an operator (semiautomatic analysis). Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of the 2 different approaches were compared. Invasive fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 or diameter stenosis ≥80% on quantitative coronary angiography was used as reference standard to define ischemia. We enrolled 115 patients (88 men; age 57±9 years). There were 72 of 286 (25%) vessels causing ischemia in 52 of 115 (45%) patients. The semiautomatic analysis method was better than the fully automatic method at predicting ischemia (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves, 0.87 versus 0.69; <0.001) with readings obtained in the endocardial myocardium performing better than those in the epicardial myocardium (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves, 0.87 versus 0.72; <0.001). The difference in performance between blood flow, expressed as relative to remote myocardium, and absolute blood flow was not statistically significant (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves, 0.90 versus 0.87; =ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Endocardial perfusion parameters obtained by semiautomatic analysis of dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging may permit robust discrimination between coronary vessels causing ischemia versus not causing ischemia.

摘要

背景

心肌动态计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像的临床分析缺乏标准化。这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较不同的分析方法,以诊断因行有创冠状动脉造影而转诊的稳定型心绞痛患者的心肌缺血情况。

方法与结果

因评估稳定型心绞痛症状而转诊的患者,使用第二代双源扫描仪接受腺苷负荷动态计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像检查。通过参数反卷积为每个心肌体素计算血流量等定量灌注参数。最初,根据左心室标准17节段模型提取灌注参数(全自动分析)。然后由一名操作人员进行手动采样(半自动分析)。比较两种不同方法的受试者操作特征曲线下面积。将定量冠状动脉造影时的有创血流储备分数≤0.80或直径狭窄≥80%用作定义心肌缺血的参考标准。我们纳入了115例患者(88例男性;年龄57±9岁)。115例患者中有52例(45%)存在心肌缺血,286支血管中有72支(25%)导致心肌缺血。在预测心肌缺血方面,半自动分析方法优于全自动分析方法(受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.87和0.69;P<0.001),心内膜心肌层的读数比心外膜心肌层的表现更好(受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.87和0.72;P<0.001)。相对于远隔心肌层的血流量与绝对血流量之间的性能差异无统计学意义(受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.90和0.87;P=无显著性差异)。

结论

通过动态计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像的半自动分析获得的心内膜灌注参数,可能有助于对导致心肌缺血和未导致心肌缺血的冠状动脉血管进行可靠鉴别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验