Suppr超能文献

短期、频繁、每周5天的中心血液透析与每周3天治疗的对比:一项通过中西部儿科肾脏病学联盟开展的随机交叉试点试验。

Short, frequent, 5-days-per-week, in-center hemodialysis versus 3-days-per week treatment: a randomized crossover pilot trial through the Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium.

作者信息

Laskin Benjamin L, Huang Guixia, King Eileen, Geary Denis F, Licht Christoph, Metlay Joshua P, Furth Susan L, Kimball Tom, Mitsnefes Mark

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 2017 Aug;32(8):1423-1432. doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3656-x. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No controlled trials in children with end-stage kidney disease have assessed the benefits of more frequently administered hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, crossover pilot trial to determine if short, more frequent (5 days per week) in-center HD was feasible and associated with improvements in blood pressure compared with three conventional HD treatments per week. Because adult studies have not controlled for the weekly duration of dialysis, we fixed the total treatment time at 12 h a week of dialysis during two 3-month study periods; only frequency varied from 5 to 3 days per week between study periods.

RESULTS

Eight children (median age 16.7 years) consented at three children's hospitals. The prespecified primary composite outcome was a sustained 10% decrease in systolic blood pressure and/or a decrease in antihypertensive medications relative to each study period's baseline. Among the six patients completing both study periods, five (83.3%) experienced the primary outcome during HD performed 5 days per week but not 3 days per week; one of the six (16.7%) achieved that outcome during 3-day but not 5-day (p = 0.22) per week HD. During 5-day HD, all patients had significantly more treatments during which their pre-HD systolic (p = 0.01) or diastolic (p = 0.01) blood pressure was 10% lower than baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that more frequent HD sessions per week was feasible and associated with improved blood pressure control, but barriers to changing thrice-weekly standard of care include financial reimbursement and the time demands associated with more frequent treatments.

摘要

背景

尚无针对终末期肾病患儿的对照试验评估更频繁进行血液透析(HD)的益处。

方法

我们开展了一项多中心交叉试点试验,以确定每周5天进行短时间、更频繁的中心血液透析是否可行,以及与每周3次常规血液透析治疗相比,是否能改善血压。由于成人研究未对每周透析时长进行控制,我们在两个为期3个月的研究阶段将每周总治疗时间固定为12小时透析;仅每周透析频率在研究阶段之间从5天变为3天。

结果

8名儿童(中位年龄16.7岁)在3家儿童医院同意参与。预先设定的主要复合结局是收缩压持续下降10%和/或相对于每个研究阶段的基线,降压药物用量减少。在完成两个研究阶段的6名患者中,5名(83.3%)在每周进行5天血液透析时达到主要结局,而每周进行3天血液透析时未达到;6名患者中的1名(16.7%)在每周3天血液透析时达到该结局,而每周5天血液透析时未达到(p = 0.22)。在每周5天血液透析期间,所有患者在更多的治疗过程中,透析前收缩压(p = 0.01)或舒张压(p = 0.01)比基线低10%。

结论

我们观察到每周更频繁进行血液透析是可行的,且与改善血压控制相关,但改变每周3次的标准治疗存在障碍,包括费用报销以及更频繁治疗带来的时间需求。

相似文献

5
[REIN Report 2011--summary].[2011年肾脏疾病改善全球结果(KDIGO)报告——摘要]
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Sep;9 Suppl 1:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/S1769-7255(13)70036-1.
8
Frequent hemodialysis: history of the modality and assessment of outcomes.频繁血液透析:模式历史和结局评估。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2017 Aug;32(8):1293-1300. doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3659-7. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

4
Oh! What a tangled web we weave.哦!我们编织的网多么错综复杂。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jul;8(7):1066-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05420513. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
8
Cardiovascular disease in children with chronic kidney disease.儿童慢性肾脏病中的心血管疾病。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Apr;23(4):578-85. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011111115. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
9
Change in mortality risk over time in young kidney transplant recipients.随时间变化的年轻肾移植受者的死亡风险。
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2432-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03691.x. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
10
Frequent versus standard hemodialysis.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 10;364(10):974-5; author reply 976. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1100105.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验