Laskin Benjamin L, Huang Guixia, King Eileen, Geary Denis F, Licht Christoph, Metlay Joshua P, Furth Susan L, Kimball Tom, Mitsnefes Mark
Division of Nephrology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2017 Aug;32(8):1423-1432. doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3656-x. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
No controlled trials in children with end-stage kidney disease have assessed the benefits of more frequently administered hemodialysis (HD).
We conducted a multicenter, crossover pilot trial to determine if short, more frequent (5 days per week) in-center HD was feasible and associated with improvements in blood pressure compared with three conventional HD treatments per week. Because adult studies have not controlled for the weekly duration of dialysis, we fixed the total treatment time at 12 h a week of dialysis during two 3-month study periods; only frequency varied from 5 to 3 days per week between study periods.
Eight children (median age 16.7 years) consented at three children's hospitals. The prespecified primary composite outcome was a sustained 10% decrease in systolic blood pressure and/or a decrease in antihypertensive medications relative to each study period's baseline. Among the six patients completing both study periods, five (83.3%) experienced the primary outcome during HD performed 5 days per week but not 3 days per week; one of the six (16.7%) achieved that outcome during 3-day but not 5-day (p = 0.22) per week HD. During 5-day HD, all patients had significantly more treatments during which their pre-HD systolic (p = 0.01) or diastolic (p = 0.01) blood pressure was 10% lower than baseline.
We observed that more frequent HD sessions per week was feasible and associated with improved blood pressure control, but barriers to changing thrice-weekly standard of care include financial reimbursement and the time demands associated with more frequent treatments.
尚无针对终末期肾病患儿的对照试验评估更频繁进行血液透析(HD)的益处。
我们开展了一项多中心交叉试点试验,以确定每周5天进行短时间、更频繁的中心血液透析是否可行,以及与每周3次常规血液透析治疗相比,是否能改善血压。由于成人研究未对每周透析时长进行控制,我们在两个为期3个月的研究阶段将每周总治疗时间固定为12小时透析;仅每周透析频率在研究阶段之间从5天变为3天。
8名儿童(中位年龄16.7岁)在3家儿童医院同意参与。预先设定的主要复合结局是收缩压持续下降10%和/或相对于每个研究阶段的基线,降压药物用量减少。在完成两个研究阶段的6名患者中,5名(83.3%)在每周进行5天血液透析时达到主要结局,而每周进行3天血液透析时未达到;6名患者中的1名(16.7%)在每周3天血液透析时达到该结局,而每周5天血液透析时未达到(p = 0.22)。在每周5天血液透析期间,所有患者在更多的治疗过程中,透析前收缩压(p = 0.01)或舒张压(p = 0.01)比基线低10%。
我们观察到每周更频繁进行血液透析是可行的,且与改善血压控制相关,但改变每周3次的标准治疗存在障碍,包括费用报销以及更频繁治疗带来的时间需求。