Grøn Lone
KORA, Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Center for Cultural Epidemics, EPICENTER, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;41(2):267-283. doi: 10.1007/s11013-017-9535-x.
Why is "everything I know is the right thing to do a million miles removed from what I do in reality?" This question posed by Rita, my main interlocutor and friend in a fieldwork that started in 2001-2003 and was taken up again in 2014-2015, opens up an exploration of moral work and moral selves in the context of the obesity epidemic and weight loss processes. I address these questions through the notion of "moral laboratories" taking up Mattingly's argument that moral cultivation over time cannot be disconnected from a notion of self. Mattingly has consistently argued for a biographical and narrative self, which is processual and created in community. Along these lines, and by recourse to the German philosopher Bernhard Waldenfels' phenomenology, I will propose the notion of a responsive self. The responsive self highlights the eventness of ongoing experimentation against the odds and captures equally pathic and agentive dimensions of a self that both persists and is transformed over time.
为什么“我所知道的一切都是正确的事情,却与我在现实中所做的事情相差十万八千里呢?”丽塔提出的这个问题开启了在肥胖症流行和减肥过程的背景下对道德工作和道德自我的探索。丽塔是我在2001年至2003年开始的一项田野调查中的主要对话者和朋友,2014年至2015年我们又重新进行了这项调查。我通过“道德实验室”的概念来探讨这些问题,采用了马丁利的观点,即随着时间的推移,道德培养与自我概念是无法分开的。马丁利一直主张一种传记式和叙事式的自我,这种自我是过程性的,是在社群中形成的。沿着这些思路,并借助德国哲学家伯恩哈德·瓦尔登费尔斯的现象学,我将提出一种反应性自我的概念。反应性自我突出了在逆境中持续进行实验的事件性,并捕捉到了一个自我的情感和能动维度,这个自我既持续存在又随着时间的推移而发生转变。