Rattanaumpawan Pinyo, Nachamkin Irving, Bilker Warren B, Roy Jason A, Metlay Joshua P, Zaoutis Theoklis E, Lautenbach Ebbing
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017 Apr 8;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0202-4.
Suboptimal clinical response to fluoroquinolone (FQ) therapy has been clearly documented in patients with Salmonella typhi infection with reduced FQ susceptibility. However, the clinical impact of reduced FQ susceptibility on other infections including E. coli urinary tract infections (UTIs) has never been evaluated.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of female patients with fluoroquinolone susceptible E. coli (FQSEC) UTIs who received FQ therapy at outpatient services within University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia. Exposed patients were those with high MIC-FQSEC UTIs (the levofloxacin MIC > 0.12 but ≤ 2 mg/L) while unexposed patients were those with low MIC-FQSEC UTIs (the levofloxacin MIC ≤ 0.12 mg/L). The primary treatment outcome was treatment failure within 10 weeks after initiation of FQ therapy.
From May 2008 to April 2011, we enrolled 29 exposed patients and 246 unexposed patients. Two patients in each group experienced treatment failure; exposed vs. unexposed (6.9 vs. 0.8%; p = 0.06). Risk difference and risk ratio (RR) for treatment failure were 0.06 [95% CI -0.03-0.15; exact-p = 0.06] and 8.48 [95% CI 1.24-57.97; exact-p = 0.06], respectively. After adjusting for underlying cerebrovascular disease, the RR was 7.12 (95% CI 1.20-42.10; MH-p = 0.04).
Our study demonstrated the negative impact of reduced FQ susceptibility on the treatment response to FQ therapy in FQSEC UTIs. This negative impact may be more intensified in other serious infections. Future studies in other clinical situations should be conducted to fill the gap of knowledge.
在对氟喹诺酮(FQ)敏感性降低的伤寒沙门菌感染患者中,已明确记录到对FQ治疗的临床反应欠佳。然而,FQ敏感性降低对包括大肠杆菌尿路感染(UTIs)在内的其他感染的临床影响从未得到评估。
我们对在费城宾夕法尼亚大学医疗系统门诊接受FQ治疗的对氟喹诺酮敏感的大肠杆菌(FQSEC)UTIs女性患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。暴露组患者为高FQSEC UTIs(左氧氟沙星最低抑菌浓度[MIC]>0.12但≤2mg/L),未暴露组患者为低FQSEC UTIs(左氧氟沙星MIC≤0.12mg/L)。主要治疗结局是FQ治疗开始后10周内的治疗失败。
从2008年5月至2011年4月,我们纳入了29例暴露组患者和246例未暴露组患者。每组各有2例患者出现治疗失败;暴露组与未暴露组(6.9%对0.8%;p = 0.06)。治疗失败的风险差异和风险比(RR)分别为0.06[95%置信区间 -0.03 - 0.15;确切p值 = 0.06]和8.48[95%置信区间1.24 - 57.97;确切p值 = 0.06]。在调整潜在脑血管疾病后,RR为7.12(95%置信区间1.20 - 42.10;Mantel-Haenszel p值 = 0.04)。
我们的研究证明了FQ敏感性降低对FQSEC UTIs中FQ治疗反应的负面影响。这种负面影响在其他严重感染中可能更明显。应在其他临床情况下开展进一步研究以填补知识空白。