Huang Yueng-Hsiang, Lee Jin, Chen Zhuo, Perry MacKenna, Cheung Janelle H, Wang Mo
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA.
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA; Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jun;103:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Zohar and Luria's (2005) safety climate (SC) scale, measuring organization- and group- level SC each with 16 items, is widely used in research and practice. To improve the utility of the SC scale, we shortened the original full-length SC scales. Item response theory (IRT) analysis was conducted using a sample of 29,179 frontline workers from various industries. Based on graded response models, we shortened the original scales in two ways: (1) selecting items with above-average discriminating ability (i.e. offering more than 6.25% of the original total scale information), resulting in 8-item organization-level and 11-item group-level SC scales; and (2) selecting the most informative items that together retain at least 30% of original scale information, resulting in 4-item organization-level and 4-item group-level SC scales. All four shortened scales had acceptable reliability (≥0.89) and high correlations (≥0.95) with the original scale scores. The shortened scales will be valuable for academic research and practical survey implementation in improving occupational safety.
佐哈尔和卢里亚(2005年)的安全氛围(SC)量表,分别用16个项目来衡量组织层面和群体层面的安全氛围,在研究和实践中被广泛使用。为提高安全氛围量表的实用性,我们缩短了原始的全长安全氛围量表。使用来自不同行业的29179名一线工人样本进行了项目反应理论(IRT)分析。基于等级反应模型,我们通过两种方式缩短了原始量表:(1)选择区分能力高于平均水平的项目(即提供超过原始总量表信息6.25%的项目),得出8个项目的组织层面安全氛围量表和11个项目的群体层面安全氛围量表;(2)选择共同保留至少30%原始量表信息的信息量最大的项目,得出4个项目的组织层面安全氛围量表和4个项目的群体层面安全氛围量表。所有四个缩短后的量表都具有可接受的信度(≥0.89),并且与原始量表得分具有高度相关性(≥0.95)。这些缩短后的量表对于改善职业安全的学术研究和实际调查实施将具有重要价值。