• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全氛围何时能发挥作用?一项关于商业重新开放背景下新冠疫情风险决策与安全绩效的多层次研究。

When Does Safety Climate Help? A Multilevel Study of COVID-19 Risky Decision Making and Safety Performance in the Context of Business Reopening.

作者信息

Wang Yi, He Yimin, Sheng Zitong, Yao Xiang

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA 16802 USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182 USA.

出版信息

J Bus Psychol. 2022;37(6):1313-1327. doi: 10.1007/s10869-022-09805-3. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10869-022-09805-3
PMID:35310340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8922079/
Abstract

Businesses are gradually reopening as lockdown measures for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are being relieved in many places across the globe. It is challenging but imperative for businesses to manage the risk of infection in the workplace and reopen safely. Drawing on risky decision-making theory and the job demands-resource model of workplace safety, we examined the influences of employees' COVID-19 risk perception on their safety performance at work. On the one hand, COVID-19 risk perception motivates employees to perform safely; on the other hand, COVID-19 risk perception could also undermine safety performance through triggering anxiety. In an effort to find ways that alleviate the negative implications of risk perception, we also tested a cross-level interaction model where the risk perception-anxiety relation is weakened with a favorable team safety climate as well as low abusive supervision. Our data were collected from car dealership employees located in China in March 2020, when businesses just started to reopen in locations where these data were collected. Results showed that COVID-19 risk perception was positively related to anxiety, which in turn undermined safety performance. This negative effect canceled out the direct positive effects of COVID-19 risk perception on safety performance. In addition, cross-level interaction results showed that the buffering effect of team safety climate on the risk perception-anxiety relation was diminished with an abusive supervisor. Our findings provide valuable and timely implications on risk management and workplace safety during a public health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

随着全球许多地方针对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的封锁措施逐渐解除,企业正在逐步重新开业。对企业来说,管理工作场所的感染风险并安全重新开业具有挑战性,但势在必行。借鉴风险决策理论和工作场所安全的工作需求-资源模型,我们研究了员工对COVID-19的风险认知对其工作安全绩效的影响。一方面,对COVID-19的风险认知促使员工安全行事;另一方面,对COVID-19的风险认知也可能通过引发焦虑而损害安全绩效。为了找到减轻风险认知负面影响的方法,我们还测试了一个跨层次交互模型,在该模型中,风险认知与焦虑之间的关系会因良好的团队安全氛围以及低程度的辱骂性监督而减弱。我们的数据于2020年3月从中国的汽车经销商员工中收集,当时在收集数据的地点企业刚刚开始重新开业。结果表明,对COVID-19的风险认知与焦虑呈正相关,而焦虑反过来又损害了安全绩效。这种负面影响抵消了对COVID-19的风险认知对安全绩效的直接积极影响。此外,跨层次交互结果表明,在存在辱骂性上司的情况下,团队安全氛围对风险认知与焦虑关系的缓冲作用会减弱。我们的研究结果为COVID-19大流行等公共卫生危机期间的风险管理和工作场所安全提供了宝贵且及时的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/3abea3bc0da8/10869_2022_9805_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/cb951f3ca994/10869_2022_9805_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/70cb3c86194e/10869_2022_9805_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/3cf922c7c506/10869_2022_9805_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/3abea3bc0da8/10869_2022_9805_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/cb951f3ca994/10869_2022_9805_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/70cb3c86194e/10869_2022_9805_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/3cf922c7c506/10869_2022_9805_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6edd/8922079/3abea3bc0da8/10869_2022_9805_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
When Does Safety Climate Help? A Multilevel Study of COVID-19 Risky Decision Making and Safety Performance in the Context of Business Reopening.安全氛围何时能发挥作用?一项关于商业重新开放背景下新冠疫情风险决策与安全绩效的多层次研究。
J Bus Psychol. 2022;37(6):1313-1327. doi: 10.1007/s10869-022-09805-3. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
2
COVID-19 moral disengagement and prevention behaviors: The impact of perceived workplace COVID-19 safety climate and employee job insecurity.新冠疫情下的道德脱离与预防行为:感知到的工作场所新冠疫情安全氛围及员工工作不安全感的影响
Saf Sci. 2022 Jun;150:105703. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105703. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
Total Worker Health and Small Business Employee Perceptions of Health Climate, Safety Climate, and Well-Being during COVID-19.工人整体健康与小企业员工对新冠疫情期间健康氛围、安全氛围和幸福感的认知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189702.
4
The effectiveness of supervisor support in lessening perceived uncertainties and emotional exhaustion of university employees during the COVID-19 crisis: the constraining role of organizational intransigence.新冠疫情期间,主管支持对减轻高校员工感知不确定性和情绪耗竭的有效性:组织刻板的制约作用。
J Gen Psychol. 2021 Oct-Dec;148(4):431-450. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2020.1795613. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Investigating the serial psychological processes of workplace COVID-19 infection risk and employees' performance.探究职场新冠病毒感染风险与员工绩效的系列心理过程。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Mar 28:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04583-4.
6
A model of reopening businesses to decrease the heath and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from Iran.一个重新开放企业以减少新冠疫情对健康和经济影响的模型:来自伊朗的经验教训。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Aug 12;34:97. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.97. eCollection 2020.
7
Behaving safely under pressure: The effects of job demands, resources, and safety climate on employee physical and psychosocial safety behavior.在压力下安全行事:工作要求、资源及安全氛围对员工身体和心理社会安全行为的影响。
J Safety Res. 2015 Dec;55:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.道德领导力通过提高风险感知和减少伦理模糊性来支持安全发声:来自 COVID-19 大流行的证据。
Risk Anal. 2023 Sep;43(9):1902-1916. doi: 10.1111/risa.14053. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
9
Effects of abusive supervision on employees' innovative behavior: The role of job insecurity and locus of control.辱虐管理对员工创新行为的影响:工作不安全感与控制点的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2019 Apr;60(2):152-159. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12510. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: A moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor's and coworkers' safety climate.从双重角度看待风险感知及其对安全行为的影响:安全动机、主管和同事的安全氛围的中介调节模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jan;134:105350. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105350. Epub 2019 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a methodological tool for exploring sense of safety in religious spaces.开发一种用于探索宗教场所安全感的方法工具。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 22;16:1448951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1448951. eCollection 2025.
2
The relationship between risk perceptions and negative emotions in the COVID-19: a meta-analysis.新冠疫情中风险认知与负面情绪之间的关系:一项元分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 26;15:1453111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1453111. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploration of COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention Behaviors among Healthcare Workers.

本文引用的文献

1
Occupational Health Science in the Time of COVID-19: Now more than Ever.新冠疫情时代的职业健康科学:比以往任何时候都更重要。
Occup Health Sci. 2020;4(1-2):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s41542-020-00064-3. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Global shortage of personal protective equipment.全球个人防护装备短缺。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):785-786. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30501-6.
3
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
医护人员新冠疫情防控行为的探索
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 4;11(2):153. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020153.
4
How Fear of External Threats Plays Roles: An Examination of Supervisors' Trait Anger, Abusive Supervision, Subordinate Burnout and CCB.外部威胁恐惧的作用:主管特质愤怒、辱骂式监管、下属倦怠与 CCB 的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;19(24):16810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416810.
5
Improving Patient Safety Culture During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan.在 COVID-19 大流行期间改善台湾的患者安全文化。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:889870. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.889870. eCollection 2022.
6
The influence of pandemic-related workplace safety practices on frontline service employee wellbeing outcomes.与疫情相关的工作场所安全措施对一线服务员工福祉结果的影响。
J Bus Res. 2022 Oct;149:363-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.040. Epub 2022 May 25.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
4
Abusive supervision, thwarted belongingness, and workplace safety: A group engagement perspective.辱骂型监管、归属感受挫与工作场所安全:群体参与视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Mar;105(3):230-244. doi: 10.1037/apl0000436. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Do we see how they perceive risk? An integrated analysis of risk perception and its effect on workplace safety behavior.我们是否了解他们如何看待风险?风险认知及其对工作场所安全行为影响的综合分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
An item-response theory approach to safety climate measurement: The Liberty Mutual Safety Climate Short Scales.一种用于安全氛围测量的项目反应理论方法:利宝互助安全氛围短量表。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jun;103:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Relationship between organizational justice and organizational safety climate: do fairness perceptions influence employee safety behaviour?组织公正与组织安全氛围的关系:公平感是否影响员工的安全行为?
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(2):199-211. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077045.
8
Fired up or burned out? How developmental challenge differentially impacts leader behavior.干劲十足还是疲惫不堪?发展挑战如何对领导行为产生不同影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jul;99(4):681-96. doi: 10.1037/a0035790. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
9
Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.提高风险评估是否会改变人们的意图和行为?实验研究的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;140(2):511-43. doi: 10.1037/a0033065. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
10
Associations between risk perceptions and worry about common diseases: a between- and within-subjects examination.风险认知与常见疾病担忧之间的关联:在个体间和个体内的考察。
Psychol Health. 2013;28(4):434-49. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.737464. Epub 2012 Nov 5.