Suppr超能文献

超声检查与临床检查用于估计足月胎儿体重的比较。

Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term.

作者信息

Lanowski Jan-Simon, Lanowski Gabriele, Schippert Cordula, Drinkut Kristina, Hillemanns Peter, Staboulidou Ismini

机构信息

Hanover Medical School, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hanover, Germany.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Mar;77(3):276-283. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102406.

Abstract

At term, fetal weight estimation is an important factor for decisions about the delivery mode and the timing of labor induction. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of abdominal palpation with that of ultrasound performed by different examiners to estimate fetal weight. The study investigated whether differences in the examiners' training affected fetal weight estimates. The accuracy of the weight estimates made for fetuses with extreme birth weights was also evaluated. Finally, the accuracy of Johnson's method and of Insler and Bernstein's formula for estimating fetal weight were compared with the other two methods. This prospective study included singleton pregnancies between 37 weeks of gestation and 12 days post-term planned for vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Ultrasound and abdominal palpation using Leopold's maneuvers were performed by examiners with different levels of professional experience. Fetal weight was additionally estimated using Insler and Bernstein's formula and Johnson's method. Statistical analysis calculated the accuracy of fetal weight estimates for the different examiners and the four methods. A total of 204 women were included in the analysis. Trained ultrasound examiners were most accurate when estimating fetal weight compared with all other examiners. The comparison of all four methods showed that fetal weight was assessed most accurately with ultrasound. No learning curve could be established. BMI and advanced gestational age affected the accuracy of the estimated weight. The analysis showed that a greater deviation between estimated weight and actual weight occurred with all four methods for fetuses at either end of the extremes of fetal weight, i.e., with very low or very high birth weights. Fetal weight should be estimated using ultrasound. A good ultrasound training is essential.

摘要

足月时,胎儿体重估计是决定分娩方式和引产时机的重要因素。本研究旨在比较不同检查者进行腹部触诊与超声检查估计胎儿体重的准确性。该研究调查了检查者培训方面的差异是否会影响胎儿体重估计。还评估了对极低或极高出生体重胎儿体重估计的准确性。最后,将约翰逊法以及因斯勒和伯恩斯坦公式估计胎儿体重的准确性与其他两种方法进行了比较。这项前瞻性研究纳入了妊娠37周及过期12天内计划经阴道分娩或剖宫产的单胎妊娠。由具有不同专业经验水平的检查者进行超声检查和使用利奥波德手法进行腹部触诊。另外,使用因斯勒和伯恩斯坦公式以及约翰逊法估计胎儿体重。统计分析计算了不同检查者和四种方法估计胎儿体重的准确性。共有204名女性纳入分析。与所有其他检查者相比,经过培训的超声检查者在估计胎儿体重时最为准确。对所有四种方法的比较表明,超声评估胎儿体重最为准确。无法确定学习曲线。体重指数(BMI)和孕周增加会影响估计体重的准确性。分析表明,对于胎儿体重极低或极高两端的胎儿,即出生体重非常低或非常高的胎儿,所有四种方法在估计体重与实际体重之间均出现了更大的偏差。应使用超声估计胎儿体重。良好的超声培训至关重要。

相似文献

1
Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Mar;77(3):276-283. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102406.
5
Estimated Fetal Weight: Comparison of Clinical Versus Ultrasound Estimate.
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017 Jan;15(1):51-55. doi: 10.3126/jnhrc.v15i1.18014.
6
Investigating the accuracy of Johnson's rule in estimating fetal weight.
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Feb 7;13:9. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1354_22. eCollection 2024.
7
Peripartum Prediction of Fetal Weight in Gravidas With Obesity.
J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Oct;43(10):1903-1910. doi: 10.1002/jum.16523. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
8
Estimation of fetal weight: a comparison of clinical and sonographic methods.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jul;39(5):639-646. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1571567. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
9
Estimation of fetal weight near term: comparison between ultrasound and symphysis-fundus evaluation by Johnson's rule.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;34(7):1070-1074. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1623874. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

3
Comparison of Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st Growth Charts for Estimating Fetal Weight in the Third Trimester via Ultrasound.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81333. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Machine learning approach for the prediction of macrosomia.
Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2024 Aug 27;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s42492-024-00172-9.
6
Fetal femur length and risk of diabetes in adolescence: a prospective cohort study.
Trop Med Health. 2024 Jul 1;52(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41182-024-00611-6.
8
Accuracy of Estimated Fetal Weight by Ultrasound Versus Leopold Maneuver.
Ultrasound Q. 2024 Mar 1;40(1):87-92. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000670.
9
Factors Affecting Clinical over and Underestimation of Fetal Weight-A Retrospective Cohort.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):6760. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226760.
10
Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03645-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Women with Diet Controlled Gestational Diabetes.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012 Feb;72(2):144-148. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298278.
2
Estimation of fetal weight before delivery in low-resource setting of North-west Nigeria: can we rely on our clinical skills?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(8):949-53. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.938627. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
3
Multivariable evaluation of term birth weight: a comparison between ultrasound biometry and symphysis-fundal height.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Sep;27(13):1328-32. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.858241. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
4
Specific formulas improve the estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound scan.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 May;27(7):737-42. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.837877. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
6
Clinical accuracy of estimated fetal weight in term pregnancies in a teaching hospital.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Jan;27(1):89-93. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.806474. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Clinical estimation of fetal weight: is accuracy acquired with professional experience?
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(4):321-4. doi: 10.1159/000323149. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验