Nolden Alissa A, Hayes John E
Sensory Evaluation Center, Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Food Qual Prefer. 2017 Jan;55:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
The present study was conducted to a) generate suprathresold dose-response functions for multiple qualities evoked by capsaicin across a wide range of concentrations, and b) revisit how intensity ratings and liking may differ as a function of self reported intake. Individuals rated eight samples of capsaicin for perceived burn and bitterness, as well as disliking/liking. Measures of reported preference for chili peppers, chili intake frequency, prior experience and personality measures were also assessed. Here, we confirm prior findings showing that burn in the laboratory differs with reported chili intake, with infrequent consumers reporting more burn. We extend these findings by exploring how capsaicin perception varies by reported liking, and measures of variety seeking. We also address the question of whether differences in burn ratings may potentially be an artifact of differential scale usage across groups due to prior experience, and not chronic desensitization, as is typically assumed. By using generalized scaling methods and recalled sensations, we conclude the differences observed here and elsewhere are not likely due to differences in how participants use rating scales.
a)针对辣椒素在广泛浓度范围内引发的多种特性生成阈上剂量反应函数,以及b)重新审视强度评级和喜好如何因自我报告的摄入量而有所不同。参与者对八个辣椒素样本的灼痛、苦味以及不喜欢/喜欢程度进行了评级。还评估了对辣椒的报告偏好、辣椒摄入频率、既往经验和个性指标。在此,我们证实了先前的研究结果,即实验室中的灼痛感觉因报告的辣椒摄入量而异,不常食用者报告的灼痛程度更高。我们通过探究辣椒素感知如何因报告的喜好和寻求多样性的指标而变化来扩展这些发现。我们还解决了一个问题,即灼痛评级的差异是否可能是由于既往经验导致不同群体使用量表方式不同的假象,而不是如通常所认为的慢性脱敏。通过使用广义标度方法和回忆的感觉,我们得出结论,此处及其他地方观察到的差异不太可能是由于参与者使用评级量表方式的不同。