Sened Haran, Lavidor Michal, Lazarus Gal, Bar-Kalifa Eran, Rafaeli Eshkol, Ickes William
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington.
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Sep;31(6):742-752. doi: 10.1037/fam0000320. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
Empathic accuracy (EA; Ickes & Hodges, 2013) is the extent to which people accurately perceive their peers' thoughts, feelings, and other inner mental states. EA has particularly interested researchers in the context of romantic couples. Reviews of the literature suggest a possible link between romantic partners' EA and their relationship satisfaction (Ickes & Simpson, 2001; Sillars & Scott, 1983). To assess the magnitude of this association and examine possible moderators, we performed a meta-analytic review of 21 studies (total N = 2,739 participants) that examined the association between EA and satisfaction. We limited our review to studies measuring EA using the dyadic interaction paradigm (Ickes, Stinson, Bissonnette, & Garcia, 1990). We found a small but significant association between the two (r = .134, p < .05). Subsequent moderation analyses demonstrated that EA for negative emotions (one's accuracy when assessing a partner's negative emotions) was more closely related to satisfaction (r = .171, p < .05) than EA for positive ones (r = .068, p > .1). The association was also stronger in relationships of moderate length, suggesting that EA may be more meaningful when relationships are consolidating but before they become stable. Gender and procedural variations on the dyadic interaction paradigm did not moderate the association, and there was no difference depending on whether the association was between EA and perceivers' or targets' satisfaction (i.e., actor or partner effects). We discuss the implications of these findings and offer recommendations for future EA studies. (PsycINFO Database Record
共情准确性(EA;伊克斯和霍奇斯,2013)是指人们准确感知同伴的想法、感受和其他内心心理状态的程度。在浪漫情侣的情境中,EA尤其引起了研究人员的兴趣。对文献的综述表明,浪漫伴侣的EA与他们的关系满意度之间可能存在联系(伊克斯和辛普森,2001;西拉斯和斯科特,1983)。为了评估这种关联的程度并检验可能的调节因素,我们对21项研究(总样本量N = 2739名参与者)进行了元分析综述,这些研究考察了EA与满意度之间的关联。我们将综述限制在使用二元互动范式测量EA的研究上(伊克斯、斯汀森、比索内特和加西亚,1990)。我们发现两者之间存在小但显著的关联(r = 0.134,p < 0.05)。随后的调节分析表明,对负面情绪的EA(评估伴侣负面情绪时的准确性)与满意度的关系比正面情绪的EA更密切(r = 0.171,p < 0.05;r = 0.068,p > 0.1)。这种关联在中等长度的关系中也更强,这表明EA在关系巩固但尚未稳定时可能更有意义。二元互动范式中的性别和程序差异并未调节这种关联,并且无论这种关联是在EA与感知者的满意度还是目标的满意度之间(即行动者或伴侣效应),都没有差异。我们讨论了这些发现的意义,并为未来的EA研究提供了建议。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )