• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于信使的夫妻智能手机沟通中移情准确性评估

Messenger-based assessment of empathic accuracy in couples' smartphone communication.

作者信息

Steinebach Philipp, Stein Miriam, Schnell Knut

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 21;13(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02483-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02483-9
PMID:39980071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11844058/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

How accurate are empathic judgments of couples in smartphone messenger communication? Are judgments influenced by the level of experience with messengers and communication frequency?.

OBJECTIVES

The current preregistered study introduced a novel ecological assessment method and a privacy by design approach to study couples' empathic accuracy in a messenger context.

METHODS

Data from N = 102 participants (51 couples) was used to investigate how accurate judgments of partners' affect map their partners' actual affect.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrate tracking accuracy and assumed similarity bias in reciprocal empathic judgments of affective valence and arousal during social messenger texting. A small moderation effect for experience with text messengers was found, indicating that partners with higher experience have a higher bias of assumed similarity when rating their partner's valence. A small moderation effect for communication frequency confirms that higher messenger communication frequency is associated with more accurate judgments of arousal.

CONCLUSION

These results point to the reciprocal action of accuracy and bias in couples' messenger communication and the distinct influences of experience and usage. The feasibility and further application of the ecological messenger-based assessment of couples' empathic accuracy in interpersonal research are discussed.

摘要

背景

在智能手机即时通讯应用的交流中,伴侣间的共情判断有多准确?这些判断会受到即时通讯应用使用经验水平和交流频率的影响吗?

目的

当前这项预先注册的研究引入了一种新颖的生态评估方法和一种设计隐私的方法,以研究伴侣在即时通讯应用情境中的共情准确性。

方法

来自N = 102名参与者(51对伴侣)的数据被用于调查对伴侣情感的判断与伴侣实际情感的匹配程度。

结果

我们的结果表明,在社交即时通讯应用短信交流过程中,情感效价和唤醒度的相互共情判断存在追踪准确性和假定相似性偏差。发现短信应用使用经验有一个小的调节效应,表明经验更丰富的伴侣在评价伴侣的效价时,假定相似性的偏差更大。交流频率有一个小的调节效应,证实更高的即时通讯应用交流频率与对唤醒度更准确的判断相关。

结论

这些结果表明,伴侣即时通讯应用交流中准确性和偏差的相互作用,以及经验和使用的不同影响。讨论了基于即时通讯应用的伴侣共情准确性生态评估在人际研究中的可行性和进一步应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/11844058/c36b7d9a4de3/40359_2025_2483_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/11844058/c36b7d9a4de3/40359_2025_2483_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ad/11844058/c36b7d9a4de3/40359_2025_2483_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Messenger-based assessment of empathic accuracy in couples' smartphone communication.基于信使的夫妻智能手机沟通中移情准确性评估
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 21;13(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02483-9.
2
Couples' Perceptions of Each Other's Daily Affect: Empathic Accuracy, Assumed Similarity, and Indirect Accuracy.夫妻双方对彼此日常情绪的感知:共情准确性、假设相似性和间接准确性。
Fam Process. 2019 Mar;58(1):179-196. doi: 10.1111/famp.12344. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Empathic accuracy for a partner's negative affect is associated with couples' daily sexual well-being.对伴侣负面情绪的共情准确性与夫妻的日常性幸福感相关。
J Fam Psychol. 2025 Apr;39(3):359-370. doi: 10.1037/fam0001317. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Empathic accuracy of romantic partner negative affect is influenced by borderline personality symptoms.浪漫伴侣的负面情绪的共情准确性受到边缘型人格症状的影响。
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):74-83. doi: 10.1037/per0000642. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
5
Everyday empathic accuracy in younger and older couples: do you need to see your partner to know his or her feelings?年轻夫妻和老年夫妻日常共情准确性:是否需要看到伴侣才能了解其感受?
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2210-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490747. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
6
The effect of stress on empathic accuracy in romantic couples.压力对浪漫伴侣共情准确性的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):327-337. doi: 10.1037/fam0000508. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
7
When bias and insecurity promote accuracy: mean-level bias and tracking accuracy in couples' conflict discussions.当偏见和不安全感促进准确性时:夫妻冲突讨论中的平均水平偏差和跟踪准确性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):642-55. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432764. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
8
Childhood maltreatment and context dependent empathic accuracy in adult romantic relationships.儿童期虐待与成人浪漫关系中情境依赖的共情准确性。
Psychol Trauma. 2018 May;10(3):309-318. doi: 10.1037/tra0000296. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
Eye of the beholder: the individual and dyadic contributions of empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort to relationship satisfaction.旁观者之眼:共情准确性和感知共情努力对关系满意度的个体和对偶贡献。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Apr;26(2):236-45. doi: 10.1037/a0027488. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
10
Overcoming Barriers to Physical Activity in People with Osteoarthritis: the Role of Empathic Accuracy in Couples' Planning Discussions.克服骨关节炎患者身体活动障碍:夫妻计划讨论中同理心准确性的作用。
Int J Behav Med. 2020 Apr;27(2):235-246. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09856-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Bringing behavioral observation of couples into the 21st century.将夫妻行为观察带入 21 世纪。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Feb;37(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/fam0001036. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
2
Fast and Slow Empathic Perceptions in Couples' Daily Lives Use Different Cues.夫妻日常生活中快速与慢速共情感知使用不同线索。
Affect Sci. 2020 Apr 17;1(2):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00006-w. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Measuring motivational relationship processes in experience sampling: A reliability model for moments, days, and persons nested in couples.
在经验抽样中测量动机关系过程:嵌套于伴侣关系中的时刻、天数和个体的可靠性模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1869-1888. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01701-7. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
4
Do New Romantic Couples Use More Similar Language Over Time? Evidence from Intensive Longitudinal Text Messages.随着时间的推移,新的浪漫情侣会使用更相似的语言吗?来自密集纵向短信的证据。
J Commun. 2021 Mar 29;71(3):454-477. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqab012. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Expressing thoughts and feelings leads to greater empathic accuracy during relationship conflict.表达想法和感受会导致在关系冲突中更准确地共情。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Dec;35(8):1199-1205. doi: 10.1037/fam0000871. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
: A Framework to Capture and Analyze Personal Life Experiences and the Ways that Technology Shapes Them.一个捕捉和分析个人生活经历以及技术塑造这些经历方式的框架。
Hum Comput Interact. 2021;36(2):150-201. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2019.1578652. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
Cultural Differences in Emotion Suppression in Belgian and Japanese Couples: A Social Functional Model.比利时和日本夫妇情绪抑制的文化差异:一种社会功能模型
Front Psychol. 2020 May 27;11:1048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01048. eCollection 2020.
8
Emoji can facilitate recognition of conveyed indirect meaning.表情符号可以促进对所传达的间接意义的识别。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232361. eCollection 2020.
9
Change in Objective Measure of Empathic Accuracy Following Social Cognitive Training.社会认知训练后共情准确性客观测量的变化。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 10;10:894. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00894. eCollection 2019.
10
Accuracy and Bias in Perceptions of Conflict Style Among Same-Sex and Heterosexual Couples.同性伴侣和异性伴侣对冲突风格认知的准确性与偏差
J Res Pers. 2016 Dec;65:109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 8.