Sinsurin Komsak, Srisangboriboon Sarun, Vachalathiti Roongtiwa
a Biomechanics and Sports Research Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy , Mahidol University , Nakhon Pathom , Thailand.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Jul;17(6):699-709. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1308560. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
Side-to-side differences of lower extremities may influence the likelihood of injury. Moreover, adding the complexity of jump-landing direction would help to explain lower extremity control during sport activities. The aim was to determine the effects of limb dominance and jump-landing direction on lower extremity biomechanics. Nineteen female volleyball athletes participated. Both dominant limbs (DLs) and non-dominant limbs (NLs) were examined in single-leg jump-landing tests in four directions, including forward (0°), diagonal (30° and 60°), and lateral (90°) directions. Kinematic marker trajectories and ground reaction forces were collected using a 10 camera Vicon system and an AMTI force plate. Repeated measures ANOVA (2 × 4, limb × direction) was used to analyse. The finding showed that, at peak vertical GRF, a significant interaction of limb dominance and direction effects was found in the hip flexion angle and lower extremity joint kinetics (p < .05). NLs and DLs exhibited significantly different strategies while landing in various directions. Significantly higher increase of ankle dorsiflexion angle was observed in lateral direction compared to other directions for both DLs and NLs (p < .05). Increasingly using ankle dorsiflexion was observed from the forward to the lateral direction for both DLs and NLs. However, NLs and DLs preferentially used different strategies of joint moment organization to respond to similar VGRFs in various directions. The response pattern of DLs might not be effective and may expose DLs to a higher injury risk, especially with regard to landing with awkward posture compared with NLs.
下肢的左右差异可能会影响受伤的可能性。此外,增加跳落方向的复杂性将有助于解释体育活动中的下肢控制情况。目的是确定肢体优势和跳落方向对下肢生物力学的影响。19名女排运动员参与其中。在包括向前(0°)、对角(30°和60°)和侧向(90°)四个方向的单腿跳落测试中,对优势肢体(DLs)和非优势肢体(NLs)都进行了检查。使用10台摄像机的Vicon系统和AMTI测力台收集运动学标记轨迹和地面反作用力。采用重复测量方差分析(2×4,肢体×方向)进行分析。结果表明,在垂直地面反作用力峰值时,在髋关节屈曲角度和下肢关节动力学方面发现了肢体优势和方向效应的显著交互作用(p<0.05)。NLs和DLs在不同方向落地时表现出显著不同的策略。对于DLs和NLs,在侧向方向观察到的踝关节背屈角度增加显著高于其他方向(p<0.05)。对于DLs和NLs,从向前到侧向方向都观察到越来越多地使用踝关节背屈。然而,NLs和DLs优先使用不同的关节力矩组织策略来应对不同方向上类似的垂直地面反作用力。DLs的反应模式可能无效,并且可能使DLs面临更高的受伤风险,特别是与NLs相比,以笨拙姿势落地时。