von Oetinger Astrid, Sadarangani Kabir P, Salas Sofía P
Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile,
Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Chile.
Rev Med Chil. 2016 Nov;144(11):1473-1478. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016001100014.
The frequency of conflicts about authorship of publications has increased along with the increase in the number of people involved in scientific work. Some of the factors that strongly influence the generation of conflicts and malpractices in authorship definition of scientific publications are the pressure of academia, economic incentives from the pharmaceutical industry in the field of biomedicine and authors wishes and expectations of recognition, among other factors. The article analyzes this problem, increasingly common in the field of medicine and related areas. Special attention is devoted to the prevailing laws in our country and international guidelines related to intellectual property and authorship of scientific publications, respectively. However, the ethical commitment, intellectual honesty and truthfulness of each of the authors about what is reported seems to be the decisive factor for the solution to these authorship conflicts.
随着参与科学工作的人数增加，关于出版物作者身份的冲突频率也在上升。在科学出版物作者身份定义中，强烈影响冲突产生和不当行为的一些因素包括学术界的压力、生物医药领域制药行业的经济激励以及作者对认可的愿望和期望等。本文分析了这一在医学及相关领域日益普遍的问题。分别特别关注了我国现行法律以及与科学出版物知识产权和作者身份相关的国际准则。然而，每位作者对于所报道内容的道德承诺、学术诚信和真实性似乎才是解决这些作者身份冲突的决定性因素。
