Suppr超能文献

复杂胰腺损伤的切除术:使用手风琴分类法对术后并发症进行基准评估。

Resection of complex pancreatic injuries: Benchmarking postoperative complications using the Accordion classification.

作者信息

Krige Jake E, Jonas Eduard, Thomson Sandie R, Kotze Urda K, Setshedi Mashiko, Navsaria Pradeep H, Nicol Andrew J

机构信息

Jake E Krige, Eduard Jonas, Urda K Kotze, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Mar 27;9(3):82-91. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i3.82.

Abstract

AIM

To benchmark severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System (ASGS) in patients undergoing operation for severe pancreatic injuries.

METHODS

A prospective institutional database of 461 patients with pancreatic injuries treated from 1990 to 2015 was reviewed. One hundred and thirty patients with AAST grade 3, 4 or 5 pancreatic injuries underwent resection (pancreatoduodenectomy, = 20, distal pancreatectomy, = 110), including 30 who had an initial damage control laparotomy (DCL) and later definitive surgery. AAST injury grades, type of pancreatic resection, need for DCL and incidence and ASGS severity of complications were assessed. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied.

RESULTS

Overall 238 complications occurred in 95 (73%) patients of which 73% were ASGS grades 3-6. Nineteen patients (14.6%) died. Patients more likely to have complications after pancreatic resection were older, had a revised trauma score (RTS) < 7.8, were shocked on admission, had grade 5 injuries of the head and neck of the pancreas with associated vascular and duodenal injuries, required a DCL, received a larger blood transfusion, had a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and repeat laparotomies. Applying univariate logistic regression analysis, mechanism of injury, RTS < 7.8, shock on admission, DCL, increasing AAST grade and type of pancreatic resection were significant variables for complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis however showed that only age and type of pancreatic resection (PD) were significant.

CONCLUSION

This ASGS-based study benchmarked postoperative morbidity after pancreatic resection for trauma. The detailed outcome analysis provided may serve as a reference for future institutional comparisons.

摘要

目的

使用手风琴严重程度分级系统(ASGS)对严重胰腺损伤手术患者的并发症严重程度进行评估。

方法

回顾了1990年至2015年治疗的461例胰腺损伤患者的前瞻性机构数据库。130例美国创伤外科学会(AAST)3、4或5级胰腺损伤患者接受了切除术(胰十二指肠切除术,n = 20;胰腺远端切除术,n = 110),其中30例最初接受了损伤控制剖腹术(DCL),随后进行了确定性手术。评估AAST损伤分级、胰腺切除类型、是否需要DCL以及并发症的发生率和ASGS严重程度。应用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析。

结果

95例(73%)患者共发生238例并发症,其中73%为ASGS 3 - 6级。19例(14.6%)患者死亡。胰腺切除术后更易发生并发症的患者年龄较大,修正创伤评分(RTS)< 7.8,入院时休克,胰腺头颈部5级损伤并伴有血管和十二指肠损伤,需要DCL,输血量大,接受了胰十二指肠切除术(PD)且进行了多次剖腹手术。单因素逻辑回归分析显示,损伤机制、RTS < 7.8、入院时休克、DCL、AAST分级增加和胰腺切除类型是并发症的显著变量。然而,多因素逻辑回归分析表明,只有年龄和胰腺切除类型(PD)具有显著性。

结论

这项基于ASGS的研究评估了创伤性胰腺切除术后的发病率。所提供的详细结果分析可为未来机构间的比较提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0918/5366930/02a8088b30b0/WJGS-9-82-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
3
An analysis of predictors of morbidity after stab wounds of the pancreas in 78 consecutive injuries.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Sep;96(6):427-33. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184901849.
7
Caring for critically injured children: An analysis of 56 pediatric damage control laparotomies.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 May;82(5):901-909. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001412.
8
Surgical management and outcome of civilian gunshot injuries to the pancreas.
Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99 Suppl 1:140-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7761.
9
Management of penetrating pancreatic trauma: an 11-year experience of a level-1 trauma center.
Injury. 2001 Dec;32(10):753-9. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00099-7.
10
Management of pancreatic trauma.
J Visc Surg. 2016 Aug;153(4):259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Delayed presentation of isolated grade III pancreatic injury-a case report.
J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Oct 17;2023(10):rjad573. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjad573. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes following pancreatic injury - An international multicenter cohort study.
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 21;9(6):e17436. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17436. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Applying refined pancreaticogastrostomy techniques in pancreatic trauma.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 May 27;14(5):521-524. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.521.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Management and Outcomes of Combined Pancreaticoduodenal Injuries: Analysis of 75 Consecutive Cases.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):737-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.005.
6
Defining the post-operative morbidity index for distal pancreatectomy.
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Oct;16(10):915-23. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12293. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
8
Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy for complex injuries of the pancreas and duodenum.
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Nov;16(11):1043-9. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12244. Epub 2014 May 19.
10
Revisiting the pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma: a single institution's experience.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Aug;75(2):225-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a0aaf.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验