University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Aug;75(2):225-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a0aaf.
Major pancreaticoduodenal injury can be devastating even if identified and controlled early. To date, both morbidity and mortality have resisted the improvements achieved with many other life-threatening injuries, with reported mortalities of 31% to 50%. We sought to elucidate the impact of the initial operation in the management of severe pancreaticoduodenal injury.
A retrospective review of all patients presenting to a single Level I trauma center who required pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma from 1996 to 2010 was performed. We collected demographic and in-hospital data and compared subjects based on their initial operation.
Fifteen patients (median age, 29 years; 93% male; median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 35) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy following blunt (n = 5) or penetrating trauma (n = 10). Twelve patients (80%) underwent damage-control surgery (DCS) with or without the initial stage of Whipple resection as their first operation. Three patients (20%) underwent a complete Whipple procedure, including reconstruction, as their first operation. Overall, 87% of patients (13 of 15) were acidotic, hypothermic, and coagulopathic during their first operation. Average operative time was longer for the completion pancreaticoduodenectomy versus DCS (460 [98] minutes vs. 243 [112] minutes). There were no overall differences in complication rates, although the two patients who did not experience a complication had DCS. In-hospital mortality was 13% (n = 2).
We present both the largest series of patients to date who underwent a DCS or staged Whipple procedure for complex pancreaticoduodenal trauma and the largest series with blunt trauma. Using a staged approach, we report the lowest mortality rate for such injuries in the literature, less than half of that reported in the most recent series (33%). Given the frequent occurrence and recognized detrimental impact of acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy in patients with severe pancreaticoduodenal trauma as well as the proven benefits of DCS, we propose that these patients should undergo initial DCS and staged reconstruction.
即使早期发现并控制,主要的胰十二指肠损伤也可能是毁灭性的。迄今为止,尽管许多其他危及生命的创伤已经取得了进展,但发病率和死亡率仍未得到改善,死亡率报告为 31%至 50%。我们试图阐明初始手术在严重胰十二指肠损伤治疗中的作用。
对 1996 年至 2010 年间因创伤在一家一级创伤中心接受胰十二指肠切除术的所有患者进行了回顾性分析。我们收集了人口统计学和住院数据,并根据他们的初始手术进行了比较。
15 名患者(中位年龄 29 岁;93%为男性;中位损伤严重程度评分[ISS]为 35)因钝性(n=5)或穿透性创伤(n=10)接受胰十二指肠切除术。12 名患者(80%)接受了损伤控制性手术(DCS),或在初次手术时进行了 Whipple 切除术的初步阶段。3 名患者(20%)进行了完整的 Whipple 手术,包括重建术。总体而言,15 名患者中有 87%(13/15)在初次手术时存在酸中毒、低体温和凝血功能障碍。完成胰十二指肠切除术与 DCS 的平均手术时间较长(460[98]分钟与 243[112]分钟)。尽管没有并发症的两名患者接受了 DCS,但并发症发生率没有总体差异。院内死亡率为 13%(n=2)。
我们报告了迄今为止接受 DCS 或分期 Whipple 手术治疗复杂胰十二指肠创伤的最大系列患者,也是接受钝性创伤的最大系列患者。采用分期方法,我们报告的此类损伤的死亡率是文献中最低的,不到最近一系列报告的一半(33%)。鉴于严重胰十二指肠创伤患者酸中毒、低体温和凝血功能障碍的频繁发生和公认的不良影响,以及 DCS 的已证实益处,我们建议这些患者应接受初始 DCS 和分期重建。