Sartori Sergio, Di Vece Francesca, Ermili Francesca, Tombesi Paola
Sergio Sartori, Francesca Di Vece, Francesca Ermili, Paola Tombesi, Section of Interventional Ultrasound, St Anna Hospital, 44100 Ferrara, Italy.
World J Radiol. 2017 Mar 28;9(3):91-96. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i3.91.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is currently the most popular and used ablation modality for the treatment of non surgical patients with primary and secondary liver tumors, but in the last years microwave ablation (MWA) is being technically improved and widely rediscovered for clinical use. Laser thermal ablation (LTA) is by far less investigated and used than RFA and MWA, but the available data on its effectiveness and safety are quite good and comparable to those of RFA and MWA. All the three hyperthermia-based ablative techniques, when performed by skilled operators, can successfully treat all liver tumors eligible for thermal ablation, and to date in most centers of interventional oncology or interventional radiology the choice of the technique usually depends on the physician's preference and experience, or technical availability. However, RFA, MWA, and LTA have peculiar advantages and limitations that can make each of them more suitable than the other ones to treat patients and tumors with different characteristics. When all the three thermal ablation techniques are available, the choice among RFA, MWA, and LTA should be guided by their advantages and disadvantages, number, size, and location of the liver nodules, and cost-saving considerations, in order to give patients the best treatment option.
射频消融(RFA)是目前治疗原发性和继发性肝肿瘤非手术患者最常用的消融方式,但近年来,微波消融(MWA)在技术上不断改进,并被广泛重新用于临床。与RFA和MWA相比,激光热消融(LTA)的研究和应用要少得多,但关于其有效性和安全性的现有数据相当不错,与RFA和MWA的数据相当。当由熟练的操作人员进行操作时,所有这三种基于热疗的消融技术都可以成功治疗所有适合热消融的肝肿瘤,迄今为止,在大多数介入肿瘤学或介入放射学中心,技术的选择通常取决于医生的偏好和经验,或技术可用性。然而,RFA、MWA和LTA具有独特的优点和局限性,这使得它们中的每一种都可能比其他技术更适合治疗具有不同特征的患者和肿瘤。当所有三种热消融技术都可用时,在RFA、MWA和LTA之间的选择应根据它们的优缺点、肝结节的数量、大小和位置以及成本节约考虑因素来指导,以便为患者提供最佳治疗选择。